GOOD AFTERNOON. I WANT TO WELCOME EVERYBODY TO THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE LANDMARK COMMISSION.
[ Landmark Commission on November 6, 2023.]
[00:00:05]
TODAY IS MONDAY, NOVEMBER 6TH, AND THE TIME IS 4:00.AND WE'LL START WITH A ROLL CALL.
PRESENT. COMMISSIONER BOURGEOIS.
PRESENT. VICE CHAIRPERSON CLICK.
PRESENT. COMMISSIONER FLINT-BUDDE.
PRESENT. COMMISSIONER JOHNSON.
PRESENT. CHAIRPERSON PATTERSON.
PRESENT. COMMISSIONER STETZEL-THOMPSON.
PRESENT. COUNCIL MEMBER COLLINS IS ABSENT.
OKAY. DOES ANYBODY HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST WITH ANY OF THE CASES WE'RE HEARING TODAY? NO. OKAY.
NOW WE HAVE TWO SEPARATE SETS OF MINUTES TO APPROVE.
THE FIRST ONE, I WAS NOT HERE, SO I CANNOT COMMENT FOR THAT.
BUT THIS IS THE MEETING FROM OCTOBER 2ND.
DOES ANYBODY SEE ANY CHANGES OR CORRECTIONS THAT NEED TO BE MADE TO THE MINUTES OF OCTOBER 2ND? OKAY. THE MINUTES ARE APPROVED AS PRESENTED.
NEXT, WE'RE GOING TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE OCTOBER 16TH MEETING.
DOES ANYBODY SEE ANY CHANGES OR CORRECTIONS THAT NEED TO BE MADE? OKAY. OKAY.
MINUTES ARE APPROVED AS PRESENTED.
CATHERINE DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT? NO PUBLIC COMMENT WAS RECEIVED.
GREAT. OKAY, SO WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ON TO OLD BUSINESS AND ASSOCIATED PUBLIC HEARINGS.
THIS IS CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS.
THIS IS CASE 23LC-044 1723 AVENUE M ½.
I BELIEVE THIS IS NEW CONSTRUCTION.
THIS WAS THE DEFERRED CASE FROM.
YES. THIS IS A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION.
THE SITE DETAILS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY VACANT.
THE FOLLOWING LIST OF MATERIALS IS TO BE USED THAT'S LISTED FOR YOU IN YOUR STAFF REPORT.
PLEASE NOTE THE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR HISTORIC PROPERTIES.
CONFORMANCE WITH THE DESIGN STANDARDS.
STAFF INITIALLY HAD CONCERNS ABOUT THE MASSING AND SCALE OF THE PROPOSED NEW CONSTRUCTION.
WHILE THE NEW CONSTRUCTION IS SIGNIFICANTLY TALLER THAN THE STRUCTURES TO THE IMMEDIATE EAST AND WEST, THOSE HOUSES ARE CLASSIFIED AS NONCONTRIBUTING TO THE DISTRICT WITH RESPECT TO CONSTRUCTION DATES OF 1931 AND 1975.
STAFF CONCERNS ARE THE FOLLOWING ONE SKIRTING THE DESIGN STANDARDS.
STAFF RECOMMENDS BOARD AND BATTEN SKIRTING ON ALL ELEVATIONS AND TWO THE RAILINGS.
STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.
SPECIFIC CONDITION ONE THE APPLICANT SHALL CONFORM TO THE DESIGN, MATERIALS AND PLACEMENT INDICATED ON EXHIBIT A OF THE STAFF REPORT WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS A THE SKIRTING BELOW THE FIRST LEVEL SHALL BE BOARD AND BATTEN ON ALL ELEVATIONS, AND B THE RAILING SHALL MATCH THE STANDARD RAILING DETAIL IN EXHIBIT B, ITEMS TWO THROUGH SIX ARE STANDARD AND WE HAVE SOME PICTURES.
THIS IS THE PROPOSED NEW CONSTRUCTION, THE FRONT AND REAR ELEVATIONS, SIDE ELEVATIONS, AND THE SITE PLAN. THIS IS THE BUILDING HEIGHT STUDY THAT WAS SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT, SHOWING THE BUILDING HEIGHTS OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND THE PROPOSED NEW CONSTRUCTION, AND THEN ANOTHER STUDY SHOWING THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS, NOT THE SETBACKS ON THE BLOCK BASE.
AND THEN THAT'S THE PROPERTY TO THE EAST, PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH AND THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST.
AND THAT CONCLUDES STAFF'S REPORT.
OKAY. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF.
I HAVE A QUESTION, A COUPLE QUESTIONS.
I DON'T SEE THE WINDOWS ON THE SCHEDULE.
THEY'RE ON THE DRAWING, BUT THEY'RE NOT IN THE SCHEDULE.
IT SHOWS US EXACTLY WHAT KIND OF WINDOW THEY ARE.
[00:05:02]
THAT'S ONE. TWO, ON THE FRONT OF IT, I'M SEEING WHAT APPEARS TO LOOK LIKE A TRANSOM ABOVE THE WINDOW, AND I'M WONDERING IF THAT IS SOMETHING THAT IS KIND OF SUGGESTING, LIKE AN HISTORIC STRUCTURE WHICH WOULD HAVE TRANSOMS ABOVE.IS THAT SOMETHING WE NEED TO LOOK A LITTLE CLOSER AT? SURE. THAT'S SOMETHING THE COMMISSION CAN LOOK AT THE MATERIALS LIST THAT WAS SUPPLIED BY THE APPLICANT NOTES THAT THE WINDOWS ARE VINYL, BUT WE DON'T HAVE ANY MORE INFORMATION THAN THAT.
OKAY, SO IT DOESN'T SHOW THAT IT'S AN ANDERSEN OR A PELLA OR ONE OVER ONE.
WELL, IT'S ONE OVER ONE IS WHAT'S SHOWN ON THE DRAWING.
AND WE DON'T REQUIRE MANUFACTURER INFORMATION.
DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? OKAY. I AM GOING TO OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ASK IF THE APPLICANT, MICHAEL BRYER, MR. BRYER IS HERE, OR THE OWNER, MR. BISHOP, WOULD LIKE TO COME FORWARD AND TALK ABOUT THIS PROJECT.
IF WE CAN GET YOU TO SIGN IN AND STATE YOUR NAME, PLEASE.
TELL US A LITTLE BIT ABOUT YOUR PROJECT.
CAN YOU STATE YOUR NAME? MY NAME IS MICHAEL BRYER AND I'M THE OWNER AND BUILDER OF THE STRUCTURE.
AND AS FAR AS THE WINDOWS ARE CONCERNED, THEY'RE VINYL.
THEY'LL BE ORDERED FROM MY SUPPLIER, WHICH IS? IT WILL BE LIKE A HOME DEPOT WINDOWS.
THEY'RE A ONE PIECE WINDOW WITH A LIGHT OVER THE TOP.
OKAY. SO IT'S THEY'RE ALL ONE ONE PIECE.
OKAY. SO AND YOU'RE AWARE OF STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE RAILING.
YES, MA'AM. YEAH I'M OKAY WITH THAT.
THAT'S GREAT. [LAUGHTER] I THOUGHT IT'D BE A LOT MORE THAN THAT.
THIS IS LIGHT FOR US, ACTUALLY.
OKAY. DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? NO. OKAY.
MA'AM. IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WOULD LIKE TO TALK ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT? NO, THIS CASE, NO.
I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 23LC-044.
OKAY, MOVING ON TO NEW BUSINESS AND ASSOCIATED PUBLIC HEARINGS IS A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS.
THIS IS CASE 23LC-048 511 17TH STREET.
THIS IS A REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR ADDITIONS TO AN EXISTING GARAGE.
EIGHT NOTICES WERE SENT, ONE RETURNED THAT ONE IN FAVOR.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING GARAGE.
PLEASE NOTE THE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN YOUR STAFF REPORT.
THE EXISTING GARAGE, WHICH IS PROPOSED TO HAVE THE ADDITION, IS NOT OF HISTORIC AGE.
THE PROPOSED MATERIALS ARE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE DESIGN STANDARDS AS PERMITTED FOR NON HISTORIC ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN THE PROPOSED GARAGE, AND WALKOUT DOORS ARE RELATIVELY SIMPLE AND WITHOUT ORNAMENTATION.
STAFF HAS THE FOLLOWING CONCERNS ABOUT THE DESIGN.
ONE, WINDOW DESIGN SHOWN ON ELEVATION E ONE.
THE SASH WINDOWS SHOWN ARE IN A THREE OVER ONE CONFIGURATION.
TYPICALLY ONE OVER ONE WINDOWS ARE MORE APPROPRIATE FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION.
THE APPLICANT HAS PROPOSED HORIZONTAL LAP SIDING.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.
[00:10:01]
ONE CONFIGURATION.AND ITEMS TWO THROUGH SIX ARE STANDARD AND WE HAVE SOME PHOTOS.
THIS IS THE MAIN STRUCTURE ON THE SITE.
YOU CAN BARELY SEE THE GARAGE ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE OF THE SCREEN.
SO THIS IS A PHOTOGRAPH OF THE GARAGE FROM 17TH STREET.
THIS IS A PICTURE OF THE GARAGE FROM THE ALLEY.
AND THEN THIS IS THE PROPOSED DESIGN OF THE ADDITION.
SITE PLAN, SHOWING THE LOCATION AND THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH AND TO THE SOUTH.
AND THAT CONCLUDES STAFF'S REPORT.
OKAY. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? I JUST HAVE ONE COMMENT.
THEY REALLY DIDN'T NEED TO REMODEL THIS GARAGE.
THEY COULD HAVE BUILT A WHOLE NEW ONE STRUCTURE IF THEY WANTED TO.
IT IS NOT HISTORIC. CORRECT? CORRECT. BUT THERE WILL BE NO PARKING IN THE NEW STRUCTURE.
CORRECT. THERE'S NO PARKING GARAGE SHOWN IN THIS STRUCTURE.
DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF.
I'M GOING TO OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ASK IF MR. HOLDER OR MR. LORFING WOULD LIKE TO COME FORWARD AND TALK ABOUT THIS PROJECT.
GO AHEAD AND [INAUDIBLE] NAME.
HI, HOW ARE YOU ALL? HI. IF YOU COULD JUST SIGN IN AND STATE YOUR NAME, PLEASE.
I'M THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY.
IT'S A BEAUTIFUL PROPERTY, BY THE WAY.
YOU'VE DONE A FANTASTIC JOB WITH IT.
I'M TIRED OF SPENDING MONEY ON IT [INAUDIBLE] . THIS IS YOUR OPPORTUNITY TO TALK TO US.
OKAY. I NOTICED IN THE DRAWING THERE'S A TREE IN FRONT OF IT.
I'M ASSUMING THAT'S GOING TO HAVE TO BE REMOVED.
IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ABOUT REPLACING IT WITH ANOTHER TREE? SORRY, IT'S IN THE POWER LINES. IT'S GOING TO HAVE TO BE REMOVED ANYWAY.
OKAY. AND SHE TOLD ME WHAT WE NEED TO DO.
OKAY. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. LORFING OR FOR MR. HOLDER? NO.
I JUST NOTICED THAT IN THE DRAWING, IT'S THREE OVER ONE WINDOWS, WHICH.
AND THEN YOU ALSO HAVE THE ONE OVER ONE.
YEAH. WE'RE GOING TO CHANGE IT AND.
WILL THE APRON BE REMOVED IN THIS CONSTRUCTION? WE'RE GOING TO REDO AND WE'LL DO THE BOARD AND BATTEN LIKE SHE RECOMMENDED ON THE LOWER SECTION.
I MEAN, THE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY.
ON THE OUTSIDE. NO, I DON'T THINK BECAUSE IT'S NOT WE'RE NOT ENCROACHING ON IT.
BUT WILL BE A SOLID WALL ACROSS.
KIND OF LIKE THE DRAWING THERE.
OKAY. DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? NO. OKAY.
THANK YOU SO MUCH. IS THERE COMMISSIONER FITS I'M A COUGAR ALUM, SO GO COUGS.
IS THERE. THAT HAS NO BEARING ON THE DECISION.
IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WOULD LIKE TO TALK ABOUT THIS CASE? SEEING NONE. OKAY, I'M GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK TO THIS COMMISSION AND ASK IF ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION ON CASE 23LC-048 511 17TH STREET.
CASE 23LC-048 WITH STAFF'S CONDITIONS FOR THEIR RECOMMENDATION.
OKAY. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND SHARON SECONDED IT.
OKAY. ALL IN FAVOR? THANK YOU SO MUCH.
NEXT IS A LANDMARK DESIGNATION.
OF COURSE, THIS IS OUR RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL FOR A LOCAL LANDMARK DESIGNATION.
AS STATED 1918 31ST LANDMARK DESIGNATION REQUESTS.
THERE ARE 28 PUBLIC NOTICES SENT.
ONE OF THOSE RETURNED. THAT ONE WAS IN FAVOR.
ORIGINALLY WE'RE CALLING THIS HOUSE THE CHARLES AND PAULINE EISENFELDER TENANT HOUSE.
IN JANUARY OF 1887, HE MARRIED PAULINA ELIZABETH FRIEDRICH.
SHE WAS ALSO FROM GERMANY, HAVING ARRIVED IN GALVESTON IN 1883.
[00:15:04]
HE FIRST WORKED AS A CLERK AT CHARLES ROBERTS CORNER STORE AT 22ND AND CHURCH, BEFORE WORKING FOR A WHOLESALE GRAIN AND FEED BUSINESS, EVENTUALLY STARTING HIS OWN COMPANY OF THE SAME NATURE, WHICH WAS C.W.EISENFELDER AND COMPANY AT 2115 STRAND.
AMONG OTHER VENTURES AND AMONG THOSE VENTURES WAS CONSTRUCTION OWNERSHIP OF TENANT HOUSING.
EISENFELDER'S HOME WAS AT 3102 AVENUE P AND A HALF.
THEY LIVED IN THE EISENFELDER HOME AS WELL, AND CONTINUED TO RENT THE 310 HOUSES UNTIL 1967.
THE CHARLES AND PAULINE EISENFELDER TIN HOUSE RETAINS A GOOD DEAL OF ARCHITECTURAL INTEGRITY.
THE SANNES ASSOCIATION WITH GALVESTON'S HISTORY OF IMMIGRATION, LOCAL BUSINESS OWNERS AND TRADITION OF TENANT RENTAL PROPERTIES, ESPECIALLY IN GALVESTON'S LARGER GROWTH PHASE, JUSTIFY INCLUSION AS A LANDMARK.
PLANNING COMMISSION WILL HEAR THIS REQUEST AT THE NOVEMBER 7TH MEETING.
AND OF COURSE, CITY COUNCIL HAS THE FINAL DECISION.
THEY WILL CONSIDER THE REQUEST AT DECEMBER 14TH, 2023 MEETING.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST AND WE HAVE SOME PHOTOS.
SO WE HAVE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HERE ON EITHER SIDE.
YOU CAN JUST BARELY SEE THE TWO OTHER TENANT HOUSES THAT WERE BUILT PREVIOUSLY BY THE SAME FAMILY.
NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. HERE WE HAVE THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH, TO THE SOUTH, TO THE WEST.
AND I BELIEVE THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST IS THE EISENFELDER'S HOUSE.
AND THIS CONCLUDES STAFF'S REPORT.
OKAY. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? NO. OKAY.
I'M GOING TO OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ASK IF MRS. GRAVES IS PRESENT.
I DON'T APPEAR TO SEE MRS. GRAVES. SO WOULD ANYBODY ELSE LIKE TO TALK ABOUT THIS CASE? NO. OKAY.
I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING, BRING IT BACK TO THE COMMISSION AND ASK FOR A MOTION ON 23LC-047 IF WE MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL.
SHARON. I RECOMMEND THAT WE MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS TO GO TO COUNCIL ON CASE 23LC-047 FOR APPROVAL.
FOR APPROVAL. OKAY. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND. SHE'S GOT IT.
OKAY. ALL IN FAVOR? THERE WE GO. OKAY.
DISCUSSION ITEMS. THERE ARE A COUPLE OF TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES THAT I'VE SENT OUT TO THE COMMISSION, BUT I JUST WANTED TO TALK ABOUT THEM WHILE WE'RE ALL HERE TOGETHER.
THE FIRST ONE IS THE PRESERVATION TEXAS SOUTHEAST TEXAS REGIONAL PRESERVATION SUMMIT.
THEY HOLD THESE AROUND THE STATE IN THE DIFFERENT SECTORS SECTIONS.
IT'S BEING HELD IN BEAUMONT AT THE MCFADDIN WARD HOUSE, WHICH IS THEIR BIG HOUSE MUSEUM.
SO THE TOPICS ARE SOUTHEAST TEXAS HERITAGE, DISASTER PREPAREDNESS, AND RECOVERY.
TAX CREDITS AND THE PRESERVATION TEXAS AWARDS.
IN THE EVENING THERE IS A STEVEN FOX LECTURE ON ARCHITECTURE OF THE GOLDEN TRIANGLE.
JANE'S SAID THAT SHE'S INTERESTED.
SO WE'RE GOING TO GET JANE SIGNED UP FOR IT.
THE DEADLINE IS NOVEMBER 10TH.
THIS YEAR IT'S GOING TO BE IT'S IN THE SUMMER.
SO JULY 31ST THROUGH AUGUST 4TH, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA.
THIS IS JUST THEIR GENERAL CONFERENCE.
SO IT'S VERY TAILORED TO WHAT WE DO.
I HAVE GONE THE LAST FEW FORUMS. THERE IS A TRAVEL STIPEND AVAILABLE THROUGH THE TEXAS HISTORIC COMMISSION, WHICH WILL PAY FOR TRAVEL AND LODGING EXPENSES OF UP TO $1,200 PER PERSON.
THE APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR THAT IS DECEMBER 8TH, SO THAT'S MUCH MORE OF A COMMITMENT.
AND CHRISTIAN HAS SAID THAT HE'S INTERESTED IN GOING.
I'M INTERESTED IN THAT ONE TOO.
[00:20:01]
OKAY, I AM OUT OF I'M IN SAVANNAH NEXT WEEK.NICE, I KNOW, BUT I'M ALSO GOING TO MISS THAT ONE AT THE CHURCH BY DWAYNE JONES.
OH YEAH. THE HISTORY OF DICKENS.
DICKENS. I WOULD HAVE LIKED TO HAVE SEEN THAT.
OKAY, SO JUST LET ME KNOW IF YOU'RE INTERESTED IN EITHER OF THESE.
ACTUALLY LET KARINA KNOW IF YOU'RE INTERESTED IN PRESERVATION TEXAS BECAUSE I'LL BE OUT.
I'M GOING TO THE NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONFERENCE TOMORROW.
SO SINCE I'M DOING THAT, I'M GOING TO SKIP NAPC, AND PROBABLY DANIEL WILL GO AS THE STAFF MEMBER.
[LAUGHTER] GROUP WAS HERE WITH NO ONE CRAZY.
DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANYTHING THEY'D LIKE TO PUT ONTO THE AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION NEXT TIME? NO. AND JUST TO NOTE, THIS IS OUR ONLY MEETING IN NOVEMBER BECAUSE OF THE HOLIDAY.
OKAY, I'VE JUST SAID IT AND THEN INSTANTLY DOUBTED MYSELF.
SO I HAVE SOMETHING I WOULD LIKE TO ADD ON THE AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION.
AND I KNOW WE'RE GOING TO NEED LEGAL PRESENT FOR IT.
WHAT I'D LIKE TO TALK ABOUT IS WAYS THAT WE CAN PERHAPS HEAD OFF APPLICANTS THAT COME TO US, GET A PROJECT APPROVED, AND THEN GO OFF AND GROSSLY VEER OFF OF WHAT WE'VE APPROVED BY ADDING MORE WINDOWS, BY ADDING DIFFERENT WINDOWS, BY ADDING CHANGES OF SIDING.
IS THERE SOME WAY OR FORM WITHIN THE PLANNING THAT WE COULD PERHAPS LET THEM KNOW THAT THIS IS YOU NEED TO COME BACK.
THAT'S WHAT I'D LIKE TO PUT ON THE FOR DISCUSSION ON THE FIRST WEEK IN DECEMBER.
COULD THAT BE TIED INTO THAT'S KIND OF WHAT MY EARLIER CONCERNS WERE WITH OTHER ISSUES.
IT'S LIKE ALMOST A CODE ENFORCEMENT CHECK UP ON PEOPLE THAT WE SAY WE'VE RED TAGGED YOU FIXED THIS.
AND WELL, WHAT I'M CURIOUS TO KNOW FROM LEGAL AND OF COURSE, WE'LL TALK ABOUT THIS AT THAT MEETING IS IF THERE'S SOME KIND OF DOCUMENT THAT THEY SIGN, ACKNOWLEDGING THAT IF YOU'RE GOING TO MAKE CHANGES TO WHAT WE'VE ALREADY APPROVED AS A COMMISSION, YOU NEED TO ALERT CATHERINE, NOT JUST GO FORWARD WITH THESE CHANGES, BECAUSE THAT COULD IMPEDE YOUR CONSTRUCTION.
IT COULD SLOW DOWN CONSTRUCTION.
I'M NOT GOING TO SAY HOW, BUT I DON'T KNOW.
DONNA, IF WE HAVE ANY WAY, ANY DOCUMENT FORMATION THAT WE CAN COME UP WITH THAT JUST SAYS, HEY, WHEN YOU'VE BEEN APPROVED, THIS IS WHAT YOU'VE BEEN APPROVED FOR, AND IF YOU'RE GOING TO CHANGE IT, YOU THINK THAT WOULD BE OBVIOUS.
BUT WE'RE SEEING IT MORE AND MORE.
BUT I THINK I'LL GET WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO SEE WHAT THEY AND I DON'T KNOW IF THE VERBIAGE IN WHAT THEY'RE GIVEN SAYS, HEY, IF YOU DON'T.
IT DOES. YEAH, YEAH, I KNOW, BUT I MEAN, IT NEEDS TO BE PRETTY CUT AND DRY, CLEAR.
I KNOW, BUT AT LEAST WE CAN SAY YOU DIDN'T.
YOU KNEW IF YOU VEERED OFF THAT THERE COULD BE CONSTRUCTION DELAYS.
NOW, WHAT HAPPENS AFTER THAT IS ALL WITH CODE ENFORCEMENT, BUT WE'RE JUST LETTING THEM KNOW THERE COULD BE, WELL, OF COURSE, BUT THAT'S NOT THAT'S NOT IN OUR HOUSE.
DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANYTHING THEY'D LIKE TO ADD? NO. OKAY. THIS MEETING IS ADJOURNED.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.