>> GOOD AFTERNOON. I'D LIKE TO WELCOME EVERYBODY TO
[Landmark Commission on March 21, 2022.]
[00:00:02]
THE LANDMARK COMMISSION'S REGULAR SCHEDULED MEETING.TODAY IS MONDAY, MARCH 21ST, 2022 AND THE TIME IS FOUR O'CLOCK.
WE'LL START WITH THE ATTENDANCE.
>> WE'VE TAKEN THE ATTENDANCE VIA SIGN-IN SHEET.
>> [LAUGHTER] WE DID THE ATTENDANCE VIA SIGN-IN SHEET, SO WE'RE ALL SET WITH THAT.
>> THAT'S NEW. OKAY. WE'RE MOVING RIGHT ALONG.
>> DOES ANYONE HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST? SEEING NONE. WE WILL GO TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES.
HAS EVERYBODY HAD A CHANCE TO READ THE MINUTES? ARE THERE ANY [NOISE] CORRECTIONS OR CHANGES? NO. OKAY. THE MINUTES ARE APPROVED AND ADOPTED AS PRESENTED.
KATHERINE, DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS TODAY?
>> NO WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT WAS RECEIVED.
>> OKAY. BEFORE WE GO ON TO NEW BUSINESS AND ASSOCIATED PUBLIC HEARINGS, OUR FIRST CASE IS STUCK IN TRAFFIC.
WE'RE GOING TO ROTATE HER TO THE LAST NUMBER 1 WILL BE NUMBER 3.
SO THAT MEANS WE'RE [NOISE] GOING TO START WITH NUMBER 2, WHICH IS CASE 22 LC-0041602 WINNING.
>> HOLD UP, SIR. WE'LL CALL YOU UP TO SAY, THANK YOU.
>> ALREADY, SO 1602, WINNING LUG HAS REQUESTS FOR US TO BE APPROPRIATENESS FOR ALTERATIONS TO THE STRUCTURE, INCLUDING A RECONSTRUCTED CANOPY AND WINDOWS AND WINDOW OPENINGS.
THERE WERE EIGHT PUBLIC NOTICES SENT, ONE RETURN THAT ONE IN OPPOSITION.
OCTOBER 2021 RECONSTRUCTION AMMONIFICATION WAS DONE TO THE STRUCTURE WITHOUT PERMANENTLY LANDMARK COMMISSIONER REVIEWS HAS INCLUDED CHANGE MATERIALS ON THE EXISTING OWNING AND THE ADDITION OF TWO NEW WINDOW OPENINGS FACING 16TH STREET.
THE APPLICANT THEN SUBMITTED A BUILDING PERMIT FOR MODIFICATIONS AND THE APPLICANT NOW REQUESTS A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS TO RETAIN THESE CHANGES.
PLEASE NOTE THE DESIGN STANDARDS IN THE STAFF REPORT.
STAFF LINES, THE CANOPY PARTIALLY CONFORMS WITH THE DESIGN STANDARDS THAT GAUSSIAN ARCHITECTURAL GUIDEBOOK NAMES A PROPERTY OF SALE.
WE FINISH OUR GROCERY BILL CIRCA 1901,1912 SANBORN INSURANCE MAP SHOW A CANOPY ON THE BUILDING AT THAT TIME.
THE CANOPY BE USED WITH THIS QUITE COMMON ON HISTORIC COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS, INCLUDING CORNER STORES AND TEND TO BE FAIRLY SIMPLE IN DESIGN.
1985, SANBORN MAPS INDICATE THE CANOPY WAS REMOVED SOMETIME AFTER 1947, BUT THEN REBUILT.
THE REBUILT CANOPY WE'RE LOOKING AT TODAY IS EXTREMELY FLAT, THE ROOFING IS NOT EASILY VISIBLE FROM THE STREET.
HOWEVER, TEXTURED HARDY BOARD PHASE SHIFT APPEARS TO BE INSTALLED ON THE EDGES OF THE CANOPY, WHICH IS A VIOLATION OF THAT DESIGN STANDARDS.
STAFF HAS CONCERNS ABOUT THE NEW WINDOWS ADDED FACING 16TH STREET WHICH LOCATED AND LOCATION BE HIGHLY VISIBLE SECONDARY WALL.
PRESERVATION, REPAIRING THE PLACES A PRIORITY, SANBORN MASS INDICATE THAT THE ADDITION WAS PRESENT AS RECENTLY AS 1947, MEANING THAT THE ADDITION OF THOSE SMALL IN SIZE HAS SOME HISTORIC PROVENANCE.
THE WINDOWS WHICH WERE INSTALLED DID NOT APPEAR TO MATCH THE STANDARD FOR NEW WINDOWS ON HIGHLY VISIBLE FACADES.
A PRAYER TO BE VINYL WITH SIMILARLY AT BUTTONS AND DIVIDED LIGHTS.
LANDMARK COMMISSION DETERMINES ADDITION OF NEW WINDOW OPENINGS IS APPROPRIATE.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE WINDOWS BE WOOD AND IT WENT OVER ONE CONFIGURATION INSTEAD.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THE REQUEST BE APPROVED ON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.
A SPECIFIC CONDITION 1 THEY STARE MODIFICATION [INAUDIBLE] DESIGN MATERIAL AND PLACEMENT PRESENT ATTACHMENT OF THE STAFF REPORT WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS.
THE WINDOWS ADDED IN THE REAR ADDITION FACING 16TH STREET BILL BE OMITTED AND REMOVED AND COMPATIBLE CITING RESTORED.
ALL FACIAL TREATMENT OTHER EXPOSED PARTS OF THE CANOPY BE OF WOOD OR SMOOTH AND TEXTURED HARDY BOARD.
PRIOR TO ISSUES OF BUILDING PERMIT, THE APPLICANT SHALL APPLY FOR AND RECEIVE A LICENSE TO USE A PUBLIC RIGHT AWAY FOR THE CANOPY, PLUS STANDARD CONDITIONS THREE THROUGH SIX. CAN WE HAVE SOME PHOTOS? THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. HERE WE GO.
WE HAVE SOME PHOTOS OF THE RECONSTRUCTED CANOPY.
YOU'LL SEE THAT A LITTLE BIT CLOSER THERE AND YOU CAN SEE THAT IT DOES APPEAR THAT THE APHASIA BOARD AS NOT WOOD BUT IN TEXTS OF TEXTURED HARDY INSTEAD.
YOU CAN ALSO SEE THERE THE TWO LITTLE WINDOWS THAT WERE ADDED ON THE REAR ADDITION FACING THE HEAD NUMBERED STREET.
WE HAVE ANOTHER PICTURE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, THE PROPERTY OF THE EAST, TO THE WEST AND TO THE SOUTH, AND THIS CONCLUDES STAFF'S REPORT.
>> OKAY. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
[00:05:02]
IT SAYS IN THIS CASE THAT THEY ALSO NEED TO APPLY TO THE CITY FOR LICENSE TO USE.BUT THIS CANOPY WAS ON THERE BEFORE SO AS THIS CANOPY, IS IT WIDER THAN WHAT WAS THERE BEFORE?
>> WE'RE NOT SURE ABOUT THAT, BUT EVEN WITH EXISTING CANOPIES, LOT OF TIMES THESE ARE BILLIONS DON'T HAVE A LICENSE TO USE WHEN WE DO THAT, JUST AS A MATTER, OF COURSE.
>> OKAY. SO IT'S NOT GRANDFATHER DONE, THEY HAVE TO BE RE-INSTITUTED.
>> YEAH. THE [INAUDIBLE] IS TYPICALLY, AS WE CATCH THESE THINGS.
>> OKAY. I JUST NEED A CLARIFICATION.
DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? SEEING NONE, I'M GOING TO OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ASK MR. TREND TO COME ON UP AND SIGN-IN AND STATE YOUR NAME AND TELL US A LITTLE BIT ABOUT YOUR PROJECT.
THERE'S A COOL OLD STORY YOU HAVE THERE.
>> CAN YOU SIGN IN THE SHEET, PLEASE? THERE SHOULD BE A SIGN-IN SHEET UP THERE.
THANK YOU. TELL US A LITTLE BIT ABOUT YOUR PROJECT.
>> [INAUDIBLE] SAID, I DON'T KNOW [INAUDIBLE]
>> OKAY. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. TREND? NO. OKAY. THANK YOU SO MUCH. YOU CAN SIT DOWN.
IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON THIS CASE? TO MY LEFT, YOUR RIGHT? NO. ANYBODY TO MY RIGHT, YOUR LEFT THAT WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON THIS CASE? YES. OKAY. PLEASE, STEP ON UP AND SIGN IN AND STATE YOUR NAME.
>> [INAUDIBLE] IT'S BEEN ENGINEERED AND IT'S BUILT BY CONTRACTOR AND DONE RIGHT.
THE WINDOWS, I'M FULLY AGAINST I SUSPECT THE REASON THE WINDOWS WERE ADDED WAS BECAUSE IN JANUARY, FEBRUARY, AND MARCH OF LAST YEAR, AFTER HE CLOSED THE STORE, HE WITHOUT PERMITS, CONVERTED IT TO AN AIRBNB, OF WHICH IS NOW LONG-TERM MONTH-TO-MONTH RENTAL AND YOU HAD TO PUT SOME WINDOWS IN THERE.
BUT IT WAS STILL BUILT OUT ILLEGALLY, AND YOU CAN'T HAVE SLEEPING QUARTERS BELOW THE TEN-SIXTHS IS MY UNDERSTANDING.
THAT'S A BIG ISSUE WITH ME, AND I'D CALLED PLANNING IN JANUARY OF LAST YEAR AND THEY TOLD ME THEY'D LOOK INTO IT, BUT I SAW THEY WERE CONTINUED ON AND IT'S BEEN A RENTAL NOW FOR A YEAR WITH INTERESTING ACTIVITY GOING ON OVER THERE.
BUT IT'S ALSO STILL LISTED ON THE TAX ROLLS AS COMMERCIAL.
HE'S GETTING OFF RUNNING IT AND PAYING ABOUT A THIRD OF THE TAXES THAT WERE PAYING, WHICH IS ANOTHER ISSUE.
THANK YOU. WE APPRECIATE YOUR COMING FORWARD.
IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON THIS CASE? NO. I'M GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK TO
[00:10:02]
MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS AND SEE IF ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION OR IS READY TO MAKE A MOTION ON THIS CASE? SURE. I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE CASE 22 LC-004 WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS.ANY DISCUSSION? NO, OKAY? I THINK WE'RE READY FOR A VOTE.
I DON'T WANT THE AUDIENCE TO HEAR, [INAUDIBLE] I THINK THAT'S OKAY.
SURE. JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION INCLUDED THE RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THEY CITED WHEN THEY WERE SHOWING EXAMPLES ON THERE, WHICH IS TO CHANGE THE HEARTY CITING FACIAL BACK TO A WOOD FACIA SHARE TO EMIT THE WINDOWS THAT ARE ALONG 16TH AND REPAIR THE SIGHTING AND TO GET PERMITS FROM THE CITY AND TO GET A PERMIT FOR RIGHT TO USE ON THE SIDEWALK.
THAT IS WHAT STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS.
THIS MOTION IS APPROVING STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS.
IN OTHER WORDS, WE'RE SAYING WE AGREE THAT THAT IS TRUE AND CORRECT AND IT'S REALLY NOT STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS.
IT IS DESIGNED GUIDELINES AND THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S GUIDELINES.
THESE AREN'T PERSONAL OPINIONS, THEY ARE WHAT FALLS WITHIN THE DITCHES OF THOSE RULES.
THAT IS THE MOTION THAT SHE HAS BROUGHT FORWARD.
THIS IS THE MOTION THAT SHE HAS SECONDED.
DO WE HAVE ANY DISCUSSION? NO. I THINK WE'RE READY FOR A VOTE.
POSSIBLE. WE'D LIKE TO DO A VOTE VIA RAISE OF HANDS.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR RAISE THEIR HAND.
OUR NEXT CASE IS ACTUALLY OUR THIRD CASE.
THAT WOULD BE CASE 21 LC-005, WHICH IS 1118 SEELY.
THIS IS A REQUEST FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR ALTERATIONS TO THE REAR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE.
THERE WERE SIX PUBLIC NOTICES SENT AND ONE OF THOSE RETURN THAT ONE WAS IN FAVOR.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS TO THE EXISTING RARE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE.
THE SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED WORK INCLUDES ERASING THE EXISTING GARAGE DEPARTMENT THREE-FOOT, IN ADDITION TO THE GROUND FLOOR OF THE APARTMENT OF THE EQUIPMENT DECK AT THE UPPER FLOOR FOR A GENERATOR AND EQUIPMENT, A NEW WINDOW OPENINGS IN THE REAR RELOCATED STAIRS.
PLEASE SEE ATTACHMENT. THE STAFF REPORT FOR MORE DETAILS AND ALSO NOTE THE DESIGN STANDARDS.
THE REQUESTED MODIFICATIONS GENERALLY CONFORMED THE DESIGN STANDARDS.
ACCESSORY STRUCTURE'S LOCATION D, NOT TYPICALLY VISIBLE REAR FACADE, MORE FLEXIBILITY AND TREATMENT MAY BE CONSIDERED ESPECIALLY FOR COMPATIBLE REPLACEMENT OR ALTERATION NOT VISIBLE FROM THE STREET.
IN THIS CASE, IT SAYS STRUCTURAL COURSES LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE ALLEY AND IS NOT VISIBLE FROM ANY MAIN STREET.
PROPOSED SITE ADDITION WILL BE CLEANED AND HORIZONTAL WOOD LAB SIGNING WHICH MATCHES THE EXISTING STRUCTURE TOP TO BOTTOM, SIMILARLY THE HANDRAILS AND STAIRS PROPOSED WE REBUILT MATCHING THE STYLE THAT EXISTING STAIRS AND HANDRAILS, WHICH APPEARS TO BE OF THE SIMPLE SQUARE DESIGN TYPICALLY FAVORED IN THE HISTORIC DISTRICTS FOR NEWER CONSTRUCTION.
FINALLY, PROPOSED RECLAIM WINDOWS WILL BE OF WOOD AND WILL MATCH THE EXISTING SIX OVER ONE WINDOWS ON THE BUILDING.
FINALLY, WHILE RAISING THE STRUCTURE THREE-FOOT IS A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT.
THE MAIN HISTORIC STRUCTURES IS FAR MORE PROMINENT AND TWO STORIES IN HEIGHT WITH A VERY STRIKING A COUPLE ON TOP.
I EVEN WENT RAISE A STRUCTURAL NOT BE NEARLY AS TALL AS THE MAIN HOUSE.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL REQUEST FOR THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.
A SPECIFIC CONDITION 1, THE APPLICANT SHOOK A FORM, DESIGN MATERIALS AND PLACEMENT INDICATOR AND EXHIBITOR OF THE STAFF REPORT PLUS TO ENTER CONDITIONS TWO THROUGH SIX, AND WE HAVE SOME PHOTOS.
WE HAVE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HERE, THAT'S THE MAIN HOUSE OF COURSE.
WE HAVE A EXISTING SITE PLAN ON THE LEFT AND THEN THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN ON THE RIGHT.
YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE'S NOT A LOT OF CHANGES GOING ON TO THE REAR CRASH APARTMENT, JUST RE CONFIGURING THE STAIRS AND ADDING THE LITTLE SITE ADDITION.
HERE WE HAVE EXISTING FLOOR PLANS FOR THE FIRST AND SECOND STORE, AS WELL AS THE PROPOSED ADDITIONS BEING SHOWN AS WELL.
WE HAVE THE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS OF THE NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, AND WEST SIDES OF THE STRUCTURE.
WE CAN SEE THAT LITTLE ADDITION AND LITTLE DECK ABOVE AND THE RECONFIGURES STAIRS A LITTLE BIT MORE CLEARLY.
WE HAVE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AGAIN, THE PROPERTY IS TO THE EAST, TO THE SOUTH AND TO THE WEST, AND THIS CONCLUDES DESKS REPORT.
[00:15:01]
YES, A BEAUTIFUL HOUSE.DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? JUST ONE QUESTION. HOW CLOSE IS THE STAIRCASE TO THE PROPERTY LINE? LET'S SEE. I'M NOT SURE.
MY EYES ARE GOOD ENOUGH TO POINT THAT OUT.
IT LOOKS LIKE IT'S PROBABLY RELATIVELY CLOSE WITHIN A COUPLE OF FEET, I WOULD GUESS MAYBE THE APPLICANT CAN CLARIFY THAT, BUT IT LOOKS LIKE IT'S FAIRLY CLOSE.
ALSO LOOKS LIKE IT'S WITHIN THE BUMP OUT OF THE SIDE.
DOUG ARE YOU LOOKING AT THAT TOP RIGHT PICTURE.
SEE WHERE THE WALLS KICKED OUT AND THEN THE STAIR LOOKS LIKE IT'S WITHIN THAT AREA.
IT'S GOBBLED UP THE STAIR CASE [OVERLAPPING].
I WONDER WHAT IT IS TO THE LEFT LINE.
IS THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? NO. WE'LL OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING.
BREX, SIGN-IN, STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD, LIKE WE ALL KNOW WHO YOU ARE.
GOOD AFTERNOON. THANK YOU TO STAFF AND COMMISSION.
APPRECIATE IT, YOUR HELP AS ALWAYS, THE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION ABOUT THE DISTANCE IS BETWEEN TWO AND THREE FEET, I DON'T REMEMBER EXACTLY.
BUT THERE IS A DIMENSION ON THAT.
IT'S HARD TO READ, BUT I WANT TO SAY THAT IT'S TWO-FOOT FOUR FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.
AS LONG AS IT'S NOT GOING TO COVER OVER THE TOP OF THAT STAIR, THAT SHOULD BE FINE WITH THE BUILDING CODE TOO.
ANYWAY, YOU GUYS HAVE SEEN THIS HOUSE A FEW TIMES ACTUALLY ALREADY.
THEY'RE DOING GREAT WORK THERE.
JUST A CONTINUATION OF THAT, THEY'VE GOT A REALLY NICE BACKYARD AND THE INTENT OF RAISING THIS GARAGE DEPARTMENT IS SO THAT THEY CAN HAVE A LITTLE BIT MORE USABLE SPACE ON THE GROUND FLOOR AND BUILD OUT A ROOM FOR ACCESS TO THE POOL AND THAT THING IS THE REASON FOR THE RAISING.
WE'VE HAD A APPROVALS ON THIS, EVEN ON THE GARAGE APARTMENT IN THE PAST, BUT SINCE WE ARE RAISING IT WITH WE SHOULD COME BACK AND JUST GET A NEW APPROVAL ON EVERYTHING.
BREX, THE STAIRWAY PLACEMENT IS THE SAME AS IT IS RIGHT NOW.
IT'S IN THE SAME FOOTPRINT AND ESSENTIALLY, YES.
NOTHING CHANGES WITH THE FOOTPRINT OF THE STAIRWAY OF THE BUILDING, IT JUST GOES UP? A LITTLE BIT.
THIS WILL SHOW YOU PRETTY EASILY.
RIGHT NOW THE STAIRCASE COME STRAIGHT DOWN BECAUSE WE'RE ADDING THREE FEET OF ELEVATION IT TURNS BACK UNDERNEATH OF THE EXISTING PORCH.
THE FOOTPRINT REALLY DOESN'T CHANGE, BUT THE STAIR HAS TO GET LONGER TO ACCOMMODATE THE THREE FEET.
OBVIOUSLY. JUMP OFF WITH FLUIDS OR SOMETHING.
[LAUGHTER] DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR BREX? NO. THANKS BREX.
IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON THIS CASE? MY LEFT, YOUR RIGHT? MY RIGHT, YOUR LEFT.
WOULD ANYBODY LIKE TO COME IN THIS CASE? I'M GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK TO MY COMMISSIONERS AND ASK IF SOMEONE WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION ON CASE 22 LC-005 1118 CEILING.
I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE CASE 22 LLC-005.
WAS THERE ANY COMMENTS? DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY COMMENTS? SEEING NONE, I GUESS WE'RE READY FOR A VOTE.
ALL IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. VOTE IS UNANIMOUS.
THANKS BREX. DO YOU KNOW IF OUR FIRST CASE HAS SHE BEEN ABLE TO MAKE IT HERE OR SOMEBODY FROM THE GLOVE OR FAMILY? WE ARE HERE.
GREAT. WELL, WE'RE GOING TO MOVE INTO OUR FINAL CASE, WHICH IS 22 LC-0031616 BROADWAY.
THIS IS A REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR ALTERATIONS TO THE STRUCTURE INCLUDING EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURES AND A WINDOW AWNING.
[00:20:04]
THERE WERE SIX PUBLIC NOTICES SENT, ONE RETURNED WITH NO COMMENT.THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO INSTALL THREE DECORATIVE EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURES AND A WINDOW AWNING.
SEE ATTACHMENT A FOR DETAILS ON STYLE AND PLACEMENT OF THESE ITEMS. WE ALSO HAVE SOME EXHIBITS HERE IN THE SLIDE SHOW, WE WILL BE SHOWING.
ALSO PLEASE NOTE THE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR HISTORIC PROPERTIES.
A PROPOSED MODIFICATION IS GENERALLY CONFORMED TO THE DESIGN STANDARDS.
THE PROPOSED AWNING IS LOCATED ABOVE AN EXISTING DOOR OPENING, WHICH IS SELF AND NOT BE MODIFIED UNDER THIS REQUEST.
THE DIMENSIONS OF THE AWNINGS ARE PROPORTIONATE TO THE OPENING, ABOUT 70 FOOT WIDE.
IT WILL NOT BLOCK ANY OF THE OTHER ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS, IS OF A SHED TYPE DESIGN SPECIFIED IN THE DESIGN STANDARDS AND IN KEEPING WITH THE OVERALL SPANISH COLONIAL REVIVAL MEDITERRANEAN STYLE OF THE HOUSE.
PROPOSED ROOF MATERIAL IS TILE TO MATCH THE EXISTING ROOF TILES.
PROPOSED LIGHTS ALSO CONFORM TO THE DESIGN STANDARDS, A RELATIVELY SIMPLE IN DESIGN, DO NOT DETRACT FROM THE HISTORIC FACADE AND WILL MOUNT ADJACENT TO DOOR OPENINGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH DESIGN STANDARDS.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUESTS WITH FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.
SPECIFIC CONDITION ONE, THE APPLICANT SHALL CONFORM THE DESIGN MATERIAL AND PLACEMENT [INAUDIBLE] EXHIBIT A OF THE STAFF REPORT PLUS STANDARD CONDITIONS TWO THROUGH SIX, AND WE HAVE SOME PHOTOS HERE.
WE HAVE THE APPLICANT SUBMITTAL.
YOU CAN SEE A SKETCH DRAWING OF THE AWNING AND A INSPIRATION PHOTO THAT WAS PROVIDED TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF HOW THAT WOULD BE ORIENTED.
WE ALSO HAVE SOME DRAWINGS AND PHOTO OF THE PROPOSED LIGHT FIXTURES TO BE USED.
HERE WE CAN SEE WHERE THE AWNING WOULD BE.
I BELIEVE, THAT IS A DOOR OPENING ONTO AN OUTSIDE BALCONY.
THE LIGHT FIXTURES WILL BE MOUNTED ON, I BELIEVE, ON EITHER SIDE OF THAT OPENING AND THEN THE OTHER OPENING ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE HOUSE.
YOU CAN SEE THOSE TWO BALCONIES THAT EXIST AND THE DOORS THAT OPEN ONTO THEM FOR THEY ARE IN THE UPPER LEFT-HAND PHOTO OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
WE ALSO HAVE PHOTOS OF THE PROPERTY TO THE EAST, TO THE WEST, TO THE SOUTH, AND THIS CONCLUDES STAFF'S REPORT.
>> OKAY. DID WE NEED TO MAKE NOTE THAT, THAT THIRD LIGHT IS GOING TO BE ON THAT PART OF THE HOUSE.
IT'S OVER THE PORTICO SHADE TO THE LEFT.
WE SEE IN THE DRAWINGS THE TWO, BUT I DIDN'T SEE THAT PHOTO COME UP.
>> HERE IT IS. THE TOP LEFT, SO THE LOCATION OF THE THIRD LIGHT IS UP THERE, YEAH.
GREAT. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? NONE, OKAY.
IS THE APPLICANT CHRISTOPHER OR MR. GLOVER HERE? I WILL TURN MY PAPER BACK OVER TO NUMBER ONE.
COULD YOU SIGN IN AND STATE YOUR NAME, PLEASE?
>> YES. MY NAME IS MIKE GLOVER.
I'M REPRESENTING MY WIFE CHRISTINE, WHO WAS THE APPLICANT.
I'VE BEEN HERE BEFORE FOR SOME OTHER THINGS AND THANK YOU FOR THAT.
THE BASIS FOR THIS IS THAT, WE'VE BEEN IN THE HOUSE FOR A YEAR-AND-A-HALF, UNDERGOING A FAIRLY EXTENSIVE INTERIOR REMODEL RIGHT NOW.
THE HOUSES, WE'VE LEARNED, HAS HAD SOME OTHER REMODELS OVER THE COURSE OF TIME, SO THAT'S WHY YOU SEE THE PLYWOOD THERE.
THAT'S JUST BASICALLY PROTECTING THE SCREENED-IN PORCH AND THEN THAT WOOD UP THERE IS JUST PROTECTING THE DOORS THAT ARE THERE.
AS WE LIVED IN THE HOUSE, WE'VE BEEN DOING SOME STORMS, WE FOUND THAT WATER WOULD ACTUALLY LEAK IN THAT DOOR, AND THEN LEAKS INTO THE SOUTH WALL OF THE DINING ROOM WHERE WE HAD PUT SOME VERY NICE WALLPAPER AND SO OUR CONTRACTOR HAD SEALED IT OFF FOR A WHILE, BUT WITH THE LAST STORM, IT STILL GOES IN THERE.
THERE'S A COPPER VESTIBULE THERE THAT HAS SOME LITTLE WATER CHANNELS AND THINGS.
AS WE ARE WORKING IN THAT ROOM, WHICH WE'RE CONVERTING INTO AN ON-SUITE BATHROOM, WE'VE LEARNED THERE'S SOME WOOD ROT RIGHT THERE, SO THE WHOLE VESTIBULE IS GOING TO HAVE TO BE FIXED A BIT AS WELL TO SOLVE THAT.
WE FELT THE AWNING WOULD BE A NICE FEATURE TO COMPLEMENT THE MEDITERRANEAN STYLE OF THE HOUSE, AT THE SAME TIME HOPEFULLY STOP SOME OF THE WATER AND STUFF FROM GETTING INTO THERE AND THEN THE LIGHTS ARE JUST EXTRA TO ADD TO IT.
WE THOUGHT THAT THAT WOULD BE A NICE TOUCH AND WE'VE TRIED TO PICK
[00:25:02]
A STYLE THAT WOULD COMPLEMENT THE HOUSE AS WELL.ANYWAY, THAT WAS THE BASIS BEHIND WHAT WE'RE DOING.
SURE, WE'LL BE BACK HERE AGAIN FOR OTHER THINGS TOO AS WE GET INTO THE NEXT PHASE.
>> WE LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING YOU THEN AND THEN [LAUGHTER].
>> ANYWAY, THAT'S THE RATIONALE BEHIND OUR DECISION.
>> I THINK, ONE OF THE LAST TIME YOU CAME BEFORE US WAS TO DO THE WALL IN THE FRONT AND IT TURNED OUT BEAUTIFUL.
>> I DON'T KNOW IF YOU CAN SEE THAT IN ONE OF THE PICTURES THERE.
>> WE WERE ABLE TO CREATE A VERY NICE COURTYARD LIKE SPACE AND THE CONTRACTOR PRETTY MUCH RECREATED THE PROPORTIONS OF THE WINDOWS ON THE SUN-ROOM, WHICH IS WHERE THE BALCONY IS AND IT CAME OUT VERY NICELY.
IT'S VERY SOLID. I DON'T THINK ANY 500 MILE PER HOUR WIND WILL KNOCK THAT DOWN THE WAY THEY CONSTRUCTED IT.
>> DOES HAVE ANY QUESTIONS [BACKGROUND] FOR MR. GLOVER?
>> IS THERE A PORCH ROOF OVER THE PORCH ON THE WEST SIDE, I CAN'T REALLY TELL?
>> THAT'S A JULIET BALCONY AND SO YES, IT DOES HAVE A ROOF OVER THAT.
>> IS IT A SECONDARY ROOF OR IS IT A SINGLE ROOF?
>> IT'S PART OF THE MAIN ROOF.
>> THE WOOD THAT WE WOULD USE WOULD BE VERY SIMILAR TO THE WOOD BEAMS THAT'S UNDERNEATH THAT BALCONY, AS WELL AS THOSE THAT ARE UNDERNEATH THE PORTICO SHADE.
IT'D BE PAINTED VERY SIMILAR TO MATCH IT.
>> THANK YOU, SO MUCH. OKAY. IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON THIS CASE TO MY LEFT, YOUR RIGHT? NONE. IS ANYBODY ON THE OTHER SIDE THAT WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON THIS CASE? SEEING NONE, I'M GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK TO THE COMMISSION AND ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR CASE 22 LC-0031616 BROADWAY.
ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION, SHARON?
>>I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE 22 LC-003 PER APPROVAL BY STAFF.
DISCUSSION, DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY? NO. OKAY. I THINK WE'RE READY FOR A VOTE.
WHEN HE'S THROUGH, WE NEED TO ALL BE INVITED TO INSPECT IT [LAUGHTER].
>> I DON'T KNOW IF WE START THAT AS A PRECEDENCE [LAUGHTER] WE ARE GOING TO BE TOURING A WHOLE LOT OF HOUSES.
THERE ARE SOME REALLY PRETTY HOUSES THAT HAVE COME THROUGH.
>> ALL IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND? THE VOTE IS UNANIMOUS.
>> GREAT. MOVING FORWARD, I KNOW THAT WE HAD A DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEM, BUT I ALSO KNOW THAT DOUG WAS REALLY FORTH COMING.
IT WAS REALLY WHAT HE WANTED TO TALK ABOUT, BUT HE'S ALSO BEEN OUT, AND HE'S BEEN ILL. DOUG, YOU WANT TO DEFER THIS FOR ANOTHER MONTH? OKAY. WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND DEFER THIS FOR ANOTHER MONTH.
YOU WANT TO DEFER IT TO TWO WEEKS, YOU WANT TO GO FOUR WEEKS OUT?
ARE THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION OR ACTION ITEMS AT ANY OF THE COMMISSIONERS? FIRST OF MAY, I'M SORRY. SHE'S RIGHT FIRST OF MAY.
FOUR WEEKS FROM NOW [LAUGHTER] IT'S CALLED ALLERGY SEASON, FOLKS.
I'M NOT ALL THERE. THE BENADRYL HAS TAKEN CARE OF ME.
ANYWAYS, ARE THERE ANYTHING THAT ANY OF MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS WOULD LIKE TO ADD ON THE AGENDA NEXT TIME THAT WE MEET FOR ANYTHING? NO. ARE THERE ANY COMMENTS THAT ANYONE HAS? NO. OKAY. THIS MEETING IS ADJOURNED. THANK YOU, EVERYBODY.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.