Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:00:05]

GOOD MORNING, EVERYONE.

[Call to Order]

IT IS NINE A.M.

I'D LIKE TO OFFICIALLY CALL THE WORKSHOP FOR THE GALVESTON CITY COUNCIL TO ORDER FOR JANUARY 27, 2022.

GOOD MORNING TO STAFF.

GOOD MORNING TO THOSE IN ATTENDANCE THIS MORNING.

AND FOR THOSE THAT MAY BE WATCHING IN THE COMMUNITY, GLAD TO HAVE YOU WITH US THIS MORNING. JENELLE, WE DO HAVE A QUORUM.

BUT IF YOU COULD DO A ROLL CALL, PLEASE.

MAYOR BROWN, PRESENT.

MAYOR PRO TEM COLLINS, PRESENT.

COUNCIL MEMBER LEWIS PRESENT.

COUNCIL MEMBER SCHUSTER, HERE.

COUNCIL MEMBER LISTOWSKI, HERE.

COUNCIL MEMBER ROBB, PRESENT.

BOARD COUNCIL MEMBER QUIROGA IS ABSENT THIS MORNING.

ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

WE DO HAVE A QUORUM.

WE'RE MOVING TO OUR DISCUSSION ITEMS. AND BEFORE WE READ THAT JENELLE, I WANT TO GIVE COUNCIL AN UPDATE ON OUR WORKSHOP AGENDA THIS MORNING SO THAT WE CAN BE AWARE OF THIS ON ITEM 3G.

WE WILL BE DEFERRING ITEM 3G.

THAT IS DISCUSSION OF CITY CODES AS THEY APPLY TO GREASE TRAPS, AND WE WILL BE DEFERRING ALSO ITEM 3E, DISCUSSION CONCERNING REQUESTING A PART BOARD PRESENTATION AS NOT THAT.

EXCUSE ME, I ASKED NOT TO DEFER THIS.

THAT'S THIS VISIT ON THAT.

AND THEN WE'LL SEE. DON HAD.

DID YOU SEE DAN'S EMAIL YESTERDAY? BUT I MEAN, I HAVE A CONSTITUENT THAT IS VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THIS.

SO DON COUNCILWOMAN ROBB IS TALKING ABOUT WANTING TO GET YOUR THOUGHTS ON THE DEFERRAL OF ITEM 3G, PLEASE.

YOU SAW THE NASTY GRAM THAT WAS SENT BY OPPOSING COUNCILMAN, CORRECT? YES, YES. I HAVE TO.

TRY TO PRESERVE EVERY ADVANTAGE THE CITY HAS IN LITIGATION.

AND I'M NOT SAYING WE CAN'T DISCUSS THIS, GIVEN THEIR PREDILECTION TO SEIZE UPON EVEN THE MOST SLIGHTEST SUGGESTION THAT THERE'S SOMETHING THEY CAN USE IN THEIR CASE, I SUGGEST WE DO IT IN AN EXECUTIVE FASHION.

CAN WE DO THAT THEN? I'M SORRY.

CAN WE DO IT TODAY IN THE EXECUTIVE SESSION? I KNOW. SO THEN WON'T THE PROJECT ALREADY START IF WE DON'T HAVE THE PRESENTATION NOW, OR ISN'T IT? WELL, THERE'S NOTHING IN THE AGENDA THAT WOULD ALLOW US TO DIRECT THEM TO STOP ANYWAY. ALL WE HAVE ON THE AGENDA IS THE REQUEST FOR PRESENTATION RIGHT TO ADDRESS THE CONCERNS OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS.

WELL. YOU KNOW, THERE WAS AN EXTENSIVE PERMITTING PROCESS THAT PROVIDED UNDER FEDERAL LAW NOTICE TO ERRING ON THEIR SIDE FROM THAT.

LET'S USE THE FEEDBACK.

SOMEBODY IS TALKING DOD COULD.

ARE WE PICKING UP DON FOR THE PUBLIC TO HEAR ALL THIS? PROBABLY NOT. DON, COULD YOU COME UP HERE, PLEASE? AND LET'S? YEAH, LET ME LET ME MAKE SURE COUNSEL, I WANT TO GIVE DIRECTION ON THIS OR FOR THE PUBLIC'S KNOWLEDGE HERE.

OUR CITY ATTORNEY, WE HAVE AN ITEM ON OUR AGENDA FOR WORKSHOP DISCUSSION CONCERNING REQUESTING A PART BOARD PRESENTATION TO COUNCIL ON PLANS FOR DRAINAGE CHANGES AND STEWART BEACH PARK. THIS IS NOT A PRESENTATION TODAY.

THIS IS TO DISCUSS IF COUNCIL WANTS PARK BOARD TO COME OVER FOR AND GIVE A PRESENTATION OR OUR CITY ATTORNEY YESTERDAY NOTIFIED COUNCIL THEY WOULD DO SOME LEGAL ISSUES.

WE'D LIKE TO HAVE THIS ITEM DEFERRED TODAY, DON GO RIGHT AHEAD.

WE PUT IT ON THE NEXT AGENDA FOR A PRESENTATION.

IN THE EXECUTIVE SESSION.

WELL, YEAH, IT COULD, BECAUSE I THINK THEY'RE PART AND PARCEL OF THE SAME THING.

I'D BE COMFORTABLE DOING THAT.

AND WHERE CO-DEFENDANTS AND OUR INTERESTS ARE ALIGNED ON THIS PARTICULAR CASE.

SO I'D BE VERY COMFORTABLE DOING THAT.

AND IN THE MEANTIME, THE PARK BOARD PROVIDE ME WITH A PROPER TREATMENT PLAN.

SURE. I DON'T KNOW THAT I'VE EVER SEEN.

[00:05:03]

I DON'T REMEMBER US DISCUSSING.

I THINK THAT WOULD BE VERY APPROPRIATE.

THANK YOU, MARIE. WHAT WE'LL DO.

WE'RE GOING TO DEFER ITEM 3E.

WE WILL SET THIS UP FOR THE EXECUTIVE SESSION TO ADDRESS THE STRANGE PLAN AND HAVE A PRESENTATION ON THIS AT OUR NEXT MEETING JENELLE, IF YOU WOULD.

AND ALSO IF WE COULD REQUEST FROM THE PARK BOARD IF THEY COULD SEND THE INFORMATION OVER CONCERNING THE THE DRAINAGE PLAN AND HOW THEY'RE PURSUING THAT TO COUNCILMAN.

IF YOU COULD DISTRIBUTE THAT TO THE COUNCIL, PLEASE.

OK. MARIE, IS THAT RIGHT? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I APPRECIATE IT.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT.

SO WE'RE ON THE REGULAR WORKSHOP AGENDA HERE.

[3.A. Clarification Of Consent And Regular City Council Agenda Items - This Is An Opportunity For City Council To Ask Questions Of Staff On Consent And Regular Agenda Items (20 Minutes)]

WE'RE DEFERRING ITEM 3G AND 3E, AND LET'S MOVE NOW TO ITEM 3A.

3A, PRESENT AND REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS, THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR CITY COUNCIL TO ASK QUESTIONS OF STAFF ON CONSENT AND REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS. TO GIVE YOU AN UPDATE ON OUR AGENDA.

COUNCIL ON THE REGULAR AGENDA THIS AFTERNOON ITEM 11 P, AS IN PAUL, WILL BE DEFERRED.

AND ON ITEM 10B AS IN BOY, THAT IS A RESOLUTION ADDRESSING THE EXTINCTION POSSIBILITY OF THAT OF OUR VIRTUAL MEETINGS FOR COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS, THAT HAS BEEN THE WORDING OF THAT HAS BEEN CHANGED.

AND YOU HAVE AT YOUR TABLE HERE A NEW VERSION OF THAT RESOLUTION FOR 10B.

SO PRIOR TO OUR MEETING THIS AFTERNOON, IF YOU WOULD LOOK THAT OVER, THERE ARE SOME CHANGES IN THAT.

AND I THINK THAT TAKES CARE OF THAT AND THE START WITH OUR CLARIFICATION OF ITEMS, I'M GOING TO OPEN THIS UP WITH COUNCILWOMAN LOUIS.

SHERRY, [INAUDIBLE] RIGHT NOW.

SURELY.

COUNCILMAN SCHUSTER, RON REAL QUICK 11Z WITH THE RENTAL OF A GARBAGE TRUCK FOR JUST THE LAST TWO MONTHS OF THE YEAR.

I'LL READ IT TO YOU AND EXPLAIN IT.

PLEASE READ THE GARBAGE TRUCKS, THE RENTAL, AND THIS STEMS JUST SOME BACKGROUND.

THIS STEMS FROM THE FACT THAT WE CAN'T GET OUR NEW TRUCKS.

THAT'S WHAT I'VE GOT TWO OR THREE ON ORDER RIGHT NOW.

AND OF COURSE, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TODAY FINANCING THE REST OF THE FLEET.

AND THE ONLY REASON WE NEED TO ACCELERATE THIS IS BECAUSE WE'RE WE'RE LOOKING AT EIGHT TO 12 MONTH TIMELINES ON THESE TRUCKS AS OPPOSED TO THAT WAS MY QUESTION.

I'M SORRY, I GET YOU MORE.

IS IT A SURPRISE TO GET IT OR IS IT A MECHANICAL ISSUE THAT WE'RE SEEING? OK, PUSH THE TRUCKS BACK.

WE'RE ACTUALLY NEGOTIATING WITH THE RENTAL COMPANY TO GIVE US A HEAVY DISCOUNT ON THESE RENTAL PAYMENTS TO ACTUALLY PURCHASE THE TRUCK.

BUT OF COURSE, WE'LL HAVE TO GET THE CEO APPROVED AND THE CASH IN THE BANK BEFORE WE COULD AUTHORIZE THAT KIND OF TRANSACTION.

YOU'VE HAD THE TRUCKS IN SERVICE IN WHAT, THREE MONTHS? YES, IT'S OCTOBER AND NOVEMBER.

A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO THERE ARE SOME OUT OF SERVICE? YEAH. I MEAN, WE TYPICALLY BUY TWO NEW GARBAGE TRUCKS A YEAR, BUT WITH THE HEAVY DEBRIS MOVE AND EVERYTHING WE HAD AFTER THE THREE STORM SAGA AND THEN THE FREEZE, WE ROASTED SEVERAL OF OUR BIG TRUCKS AND WE CAN'T NOW WE CAN'T GET THEM WE'VE FALLEN SO FAR BEHIND WHERE WE CAN'T EVEN GET THEM. I'M A YEAR BEHIND ON THE LAST TWO.

AND IT'S TIME FOR ANOTHER TWO.

SO WE JUST NEED TO GO AHEAD AND PROBABLY BY ABOUT SIX OR EIGHT ONLY GET CAUGHT UP BECAUSE WE'RE. WE CAN'T GET THEM IN THE WORST PART IS THEY CAN'T EVEN GET PARTS TO FIX THE ONES WE HAVE, RIGHT? I MEAN, YOU DRIVE A CAR LOT AND MOST OF THEM ARE ALL A GARBAGE TRUCK.

YEAH. SO IMAGINE THE GOOD NEWS IS THAT SOME OF THESE ONES WE'VE RENTED, THEY'RE SUPER BIG TRUCKS AND WE'RE ABLE TO RUN WHOLE ROUTES WITHOUT HAVING TO DIP AND GO TO THE TRANSFER STATION AND GO BACK OUT.

SO THOSE ARE THE ONES I SEE ZIPPING THROUGH THEIR DISTRICTS ON THE WESTERN.

YEAH, YEAH. HELP US ON THE WEST END BECAUSE WE'LL BE ABLE TO GET THE TRUCKS OUT FURTHER AND DO A BETTER JOB. WE'RE GETTING THE BIGGER TRUCKS WELL, ONCE WE HAVE RIGHT NOW, THE ONES WE'RE GOING TO BUY, SUPER BIG TRUCKS, THEY'RE BIG.

BUT THE PROBLEM IS YOU CAN'T USE THEM ON THE EAST END BECAUSE THEY GET WEDGED IN.

THAT'S THE ONES WITH THE LONGER LEAD TIMES AND ONE OF THE SMALLER TRUCKS.

WE WERE TALKING ABOUT ONE RIGHT NOW AND I SAID, WELL, IF WE ORDERED ONE A COUPLE OF MONTHS, WHEN COULD WE GET IT? SO I CAN GET IT TO YOU BY JUNE OF 2023, YOU KNOW.

[00:10:05]

SO THAT'S THE ONES WE'RE GETTING THOSE REHAB RIGHT NOW, JUST IN ANTICIPATION OF SPRING AND THE SUMMER MONTHS WHEN WE START SEEING OUR SERVICE LEVELS RISE TO THE HIGHEST LEVELS.

HE'S GETTING ALL OF THOSE REHAB AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE JUST BECAUSE WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO RIDE THOSE SMALLER TRUCKS FOR AT LEAST ANOTHER COUPLE OF SEASONS.

IT'S LOOKING LIKE AT THIS POINT.

YEAH, YEAH. BUT WE'RE IN THIS BOAT.

POLICE CARS, FIRE TRUCKS.

I'M WAITING RIGHT NOW ON EITHER 10 OR 11 POLICE CARS.

I'M WAITING ON TWO POPPERS AND WE'RE TRYING TO GET AN AERIAL TODAY.

WE'RE TRYING TO, YOU KNOW, WE'RE KIND OF ACCELERATING THE ACTUAL PURCHASE, BUT WE KNOW THE DELIVERY WILL BE ABOUT WHEN WE NEED IT BECAUSE WE JUST CAN'T GET THEM.

WE'RE POSITIONED TO BE IN.

SO JUST TO CLARIFY QUESTIONS THAT I'VE HAD IN MY DISTRICT, UM, IT'S A COMBINATION OF NOT HAVING TRUCKS IN COVID THAT ARE DELAYING HEAVY TRASH PICK UP.

A LOT OF IT IS. YES.

OKAY. THEY'RE RUNNING PARALLEL BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE A TRUCK, BUT IT'S KIND OF WORKING OUT BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE ANYBODY DRIVE ANYWAY BECAUSE YOU'RE SITTING RIGHT.

ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS? NO, THAT'S IT.

I'M SORRY. NO, I HAD ONE MORE ITEM.

I THINK IT'S A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM, SO WE'LL GET TO IT JUST MORE SO IT'S MORE FROM CATHERINE'S DEPARTMENT.

THAT'S WHAT THAT'S WHAT THEY SEE IN THE ABANDONMENT OF THAT ALLEY.

JUST, I KNOW IT'S COME TO COUNCIL BEFORE, NOW I'M SEEING IT AGAIN.

AND MY QUESTION IS KIND OF A I GUESS IT PREDATES OUR LDR'S IN TWENTY FIFTEEN.

SO I LOOK UP THAT PROPERTY ON THE CAD AND NORTHERN SECTION IS ZONED COMMERCIAL, BUT I TAKE IT IT'S ALL RESIDENTIAL ON OUR LDR'S.

BUT YOU KNOW, IS THAT JUST THE LAG THAT WE HAVE BETWEEN? AT ONE POINT IT WAS OWN COMMERCIAL AND THEN THE LDR'S COME OUT OF THE ZONE.

YOU KNOW, I THINK IT'S A CONSERVATION NEIGHBORHOOD.

MM HMM. SO IS THAT JUST A LAG BETWEEN THE CAD AND THE YARDS BEING UPDATED TO WHERE YOU SEE IT AS COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL? DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? I'M SORRY. I BELIEVE WHAT YOU MIGHT BE SEEING WITH THE CAD IS THEY HAD THAT USE ALLOCATION IN THERE.

WHEN YOU LOOK UP A PROPERTY DOESN'T NECESSARILY CORRESPOND TO ZONING, THOUGH.

OKAY. SO IN 2015, WHEN IT WAS ON BACK TO FROM COMMERCIAL TO RESIDENTIAL ON NORTH HALF THAT, THAT'S THAT'S THE, YOU KNOW, THE LEGAL, LEGITIMATE ZONING OF IT.

SO THAT'S WHAT IT IS RIGHT NOW.

YOU KNOW, YOU COULD ARGUE THAT IT PERHAPS SHOULD BE COMMERCIAL, BUT ANYHOW, THAT'S FOR A DIFFERENT FATE. OKAY.

SO THAT'S KIND OF THE PROCESS RIGHT NOW.

SO THE FIRST WOULD BE THE ABANDONMENT THAT I ASSUME IN A MONTH OR TWO THE REQUEST WILL COME FOR COMMERCIAL ZONING OR WE ACTUALLY HAVE A HUD REQUEST, RIGHT? SO YOU'LL BE SEEING THAT UNLESS THEY WITHDRAW THE PROJECT, YOU KNOW YOU SHOULD BE SEEING THAT NEXT MONTH. OKAY, THANK YOU.

I HAVEN'T I WAS JUST GOING TO FOR BILL'S EXPLANATION.

SO WHEN THE LDR'S HAPPENED, A LOT OF PROPERTIES THAT WERE IN COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL WHERE BLANKETLY CHANGED TO RESIDENTIAL ONE.

SO THAT'S ANOTHER REASON WHY IT WASN'T SO MUCH THAT THEY LOOKED AT WHAT THE PROPERTY ACTUALLY WAS.

THEY JUST WENT IN AND SAID, LIKE IN MY DISTRICT, ESPECIALLY, IT'S ALL RESIDENTIAL ONE.

EVEN THOUGH, LIKE SEVEN STATES, GROCERY STORE WAS ZONED RESIDENTIAL ONE AND BUILDING.

YEAH. SO IT'S SOMETHING WE ADDRESS OVER TIME AS IT COMES OUT BECAUSE YOU BRING A BUNCH OF POINTS OF INTEREST TO PROPERTY BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, AT ONE TIME IT WAS RESIDENTIAL ON IT WAS AN APARTMENT COMPLEX.

IT SEEMS LIKE I REMEMBER THERE BEING LIKE A THREE OR FOUR STORY BUILDING.

SO THEN I THINK IN THE FORTIES, SOME KIND OF SINGLE FAMILY SHOTGUN STYLE HOUSE HOUSES.

MAYBE I DON'T KNOW. THAT'S WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE ON GOOGLE HISTORY.

I DON'T KNOW. BUT YOU KNOW, THAT'S BECAUSE WHEN YOU ABANDONED, IT GOES TO COMMERCIALLY, YOU'RE STONE THROW AWAY FROM PEOPLE LIVE THAT, YOU KNOW, THAT'S THE DEBATE.

YOU KNOW, JUST HOW CLOSE IT IS TO THAT.

SO THAT'S MY QUESTION.

AND I THINK THAT WAS THE INTENTION OF THE HDDV TO PROVIDE THAT SORT OF TRANSITIONAL DEVELOPMENT PATTERN FOR LOW DENSITY UP TO IT.

AND IN THE LDRS IT WENT THE OTHER WAY, TOO, WE TOOK SOME OTHER PROPERTIES THAT WERE COMMERCIAL. WELL, THAT WERE RESIDENTIAL WENT INTO COMMERCIAL TOO.

WE KIND OF MOVE BACK AND FORTH ON THAT AND SOMETIMES A QUESTION ON THAT PARTICULAR ITEM, THOUGH THAT 8B, IT SAYS ONE OF THE CONDITIONS THAT THE APPLICANTS HAVE TO MOVE.

[00:15:08]

THE UTILITIES THAT ARE IN THAT ALLEYWAY BEFORE THIS ABANDONMENT IS COMPLETE ARE THE UTILITIES THERE. THAT'S A BIG PROJECT.

IS THAT YES, YES, THERE ARE.

THERE'S IT'S THERE'S SOME OVERHEAD UTILITIES AND I BELIEVE THERE'S SOME ALSO SOME UNDERGROUND THAT HAS TO BE MOVED.

THAT'S ALWAYS AT THE COST OF THE APPLICANT.

OKAY, AND THAT HAS TO BE DONE PRIOR TO THE COMPLETION OF THIS WOULD HAVE TO HAVE TO BE DONE PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION AND WOULD HAVE TO BE DONE TO OUR SATISFACTION.

ALL RIGHT, RIGHT. YOU CAN IMPROVE THE ABANDONMENT AS AS AN ACT, IF YOU WOULD SO DESIRE.

BUT WE WOULDN'T ACTUALLY RECORD THE DEEDS UNTIL WHATEVER FORMAT UNTIL THAT'S DONE, CORRECT? YES.

ARE WE CHARGING THEM FOR THIS? YES. [INAUDIBLE] ALL RIGHT.

VERY GOOD. YES, JOHN.

JIM, WE'VE SEEN THIS PROPERTY COME BEFORE US SEVERAL TIMES NOW.

WE APPROVED ABANDONMENT OF THE SAME PROPERTY A WHILE BACK.

OF COURSE, THE CONTRACT FELL THROUGH, AND SO THE ABANDONMENT DIDN'T GET FILED.

WHEN WE SEE PROJECTS LIKE THIS, ESPECIALLY WHEN THERE IS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, THAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN ON THE PROPERTY.

IS THERE ANY WAY WE COULD GET THESE TO COME THROUGH AT THE SAME TIME WITH THE PUD AND THE ABANDONMENT? I MEAN, BECAUSE BECAUSE AND THE REASON I ASK THIS IS BECAUSE I HATE TO GO AND ABANDONED AN ALLEYWAY LIKE THIS AND THEN THE PROJECT DOESN'T HAPPEN.

WE DON'T LIKE THE PUD, WE DON'T APPROVE THE PUD.

AND I UNDERSTAND THAT, YOU KNOW, WE CAN DO AN AMENDMENT WITHOUT A PROJECT AND JUST THE STREETS AREN'T USED ANYMORE, AND IT MAKES MORE SENSE TO ABANDON IT THAN KEEP IT.

MAYBE, MAYBE THAT PROCESS DOESN'T NEED IT.

FOLLOW MY TRAIN OF THOUGHT.

BUT IN A PROPERTY LIKE THIS WHERE WE'VE SEEN IT SEVERAL TIMES AND THE DEVELOPMENT HAS NOT COME TO FRUITION, IS THERE IS THERE SOME KIND OF SEQUENTIAL PROCESS OR PARALLEL PATH THAT THIS CAN TAKE? I THINK THERE'S CERTAINLY CAN BE.

YES, SIR. IN OTHER WORDS, IF YOU WANTED TO TAKE ACTION ON THIS, YOU KNOW, AT THE SAME TIME, IF YOU TAKE ACTION ON THE PUD, WHICH SHOULD BE EITHER NEXT MONTH OR WE DO HAVE A SUBMITTED PROJECT, SO.

RIGHT, YOU MADE A GREAT POINT.

TYPICALLY, A LOT OF THESE DON'T HAVE A DEVELOPMENT PLAN ASSOCIATED WITH THEM, NECESSARILY. THIS ONE DOES.

IT'S A VERY VALUABLE PROBABLY ONE OF THE LAST LARGER CHUNKS RIGHT ON THE SEAWALL THERE.

AND FOLKS DO THIS WITH A PROJECT IN MIND.

SO THERE IS A PROJECT IN MIND, AND IT'S YOUR CALL AS TO IF YOU'D LIKE TO DEFER THIS UNTIL NOBODY THINKS THEY MAY WANT THAT ABANDONED, REGARDLESS OF WHAT PROJECT GOES THERE BECAUSE IT JUST COMBINE THEIR TWO PARCELS TOGETHER.

WELL, I UNDERSTAND THAT AND THERE MIGHT BE A PROJECT THAT I'M ALL IN FAVOR FOR.

AS FOR THE HUD, BUT THERE MIGHT BE A PROJECT THAT I'M NOT IN FAVOR FOR, AND ONCE WE ONCE WE ABANDONED THE PROPERTY, IT IS NOT OUR PROPERTY ANYMORE.

RIGHT. AND SO THAT'S THAT'S MY CONCERN WITH IT.

AND THAT'S A THAT'S A VERY GOOD POINT, JOHN.

YEAH. YEAH. YOU KNOW, WHEN THIS CAME THROUGH PLANNING, I TOLD THE APPLICANT THAT I WOULD WANT TO SEE WHAT WAS GOING THERE WHEN IT CAME TO COUNCIL.

AND IT LOOKS LIKE THEY DO HAVE A PRETTY GOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN THERE, WHICH I HAVEN'T SEEN BUT JUST RECENTLY SUBMITTED.

SO THERE'S, YOU KNOW, IF YOU WERE TO TO DEFER THIS UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING THAN WE COULD PROMISE BOTH OF THEM AT THE SAME TIME OR BOTH OF THE SAME TIME.

OK. I RECALL WE'VE HAD THIS DISCUSSION AT SOME POINT ABOUT CONSIDERING WHY SOMEBODY WANTED WHAT THEY WANTED TO USE THE PROPERTY FOR BEFORE WE CONSIDER THAT.

RIGHT, SO SO THE QUESTION IS WHETHER WE ARE WILLING TO ABANDON A PROPERTY THAT WE NO LONGER NEED THAT, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE THE LANDOWNER WANTS THAT EASEMENT BACK PRIOR TO KNOWING WHAT THEY INTEND TO DO WITH IT, BECAUSE PRESUMABLY THEY COULD ONLY DO SOMETHING LEGAL WITH IT, SOMETHING THAT FITS THE ZONING REQUIREMENTS AND SO FORTH.

BUT AT WHAT POINT DO WE SAY, NO, I DON'T LIKE WHAT YOU'RE DOING WITH IT, SO WE'RE NOT GOING TO LAND THE PROPERTY OR I DON'T LIKE THE WAY THAT LOOKS OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

I UNDERSTAND YOUR QUESTION, BUT ARE WE ARE WE ALL OUT OF BOUNDS BY ASKING THAT QUESTION? WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO WITH IT BEFORE WE DECIDE TO ABANDON? I MEAN, MY MY THOUGHT IS THAT WE'RE NOT.

I MEAN, IF IF IT IS A PROJECT THAT BENEFITS THE PUBLIC AND WE CAN SEE A VALUE DOWN THE

[00:20:03]

ROAD, I THINK WE WOULD BE IN FAVOR OF ABANDONMENT.

BUT IF IT'S A PROJECT THAT HAS NO BENEFIT TO THE CITY, I MEAN, IT'S A CITY RIGHT OF WAY AND THE CITY OWNS IT.

AND IF THEY WANT TO KEEP IT THERE, WE KEEP IT.

QUESTION ARE YOU GOING TO DO SOMETHING BETTER WITH IT THAN WE'RE DOING WITH IT? OR ARE YOU? YEAH, BASICALLY BECAUSE EVERYBODY SAYS YOU'RE NOT USING IT.

BUT EVERY TIME I LOOK AT ONE OF THESE AMENDMENTS, I THINK WE'RE NOT USING IT RIGHT NOW.

THAT DOESN'T MEAN WE'RE NOT EVER GOING TO OCCASIONALLY HAVE THOSE DEAD END ALLEYS AND SO FORTH. YOU CANNOT CONTEMPLATE US EVER, EVER USING IT.

SURE. THROUGH THE THROUGH RIGHT OF WAY WE MIGHT.

THAT'S RIGHT. AND THIS IS AN ALLEY AND IT'S IT'S PROBABLY NOT AS BIG OF A DEAL, BUT I MEAN, WE'VE SEEN OTHER EXAMPLES IN THE CITY WHERE THEY WANT TO CLOSE A STREET.

I THINK WHERE WAS IT? I THINK WE GOT SOMETHING THAT PASSED ON MAYBE 19TH STREET OR SOMEWHERE AROUND THERE, SOMEBODY WANTING TO CLOSE THE STREET TO PUT IN A CHILI'S.

THIS IS YEARS YEARS AGO, AND COUNCIL AT THAT TIME DIDN'T THINK THAT WAS A GOOD IDEA, AND THEY DIDN'T HAVE ANY OF THE PROPERTY COUNCIL'S NEVER YOU'RE NOT, YOU KNOW, NECESSARILY COMPELLED TO ABANDON PROPERTY, RIGHT? IT'S NOW IN THIS CASE, IT'S A LITTLE BIT UNIQUE IN THAT, YOU KNOW, THERE'S BEEN AN ABANDONMENT REQUEST AND IT WAS PASSED.

SO IT MAKES IT A LITTLE HARDER TO I MEAN, THERE'S TWO SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT IS WHETHER OR NOT YOU'RE ABANDONING IT FOR OUR BETTER USE OR WHETHER OR NOT IT'S JUST THE PRINCIPLE EFFECT. THIS IS THIS IS A NEEDED PARCEL.

SO IS THIS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE CITY TO TO SHED SOME PROPERTY THAT IT DOESN'T NEED? YEAH. IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE, I WOULD THINK THOUGH, IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE, GIVEN THE WAY THE UTILITIES IN THERE, THAT THEY WOULD NEVER COMPLETE THE ABANDONMENT IF THEY DON'T THINK THE PROJECT WAS GOING TO COME BECAUSE THAT'S A LOT OF MONEY TO PUT IN THERE TO ABANDON THIS. ABSENT THAT, THAT'S ONE THAT'S A LITTLE DIFFERENT CASE IN THIS.

AND THAT'S A GOOD POINT. I MEAN, THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO SPEND QUITE A BIT OF MONEY TO ABANDON THE UTILITIES FOR THOSE UTILITIES.

YEAH, THERE'S EVEN BETTER IN THIS CASE COME IN.

DID THE PUD APPLICATION COME IN WITH THE ABANDONMENT? NO, IT CAME IN SEPARATE.

OK. WHAT WAS THE I WANT TO SAY ABOUT A MONTH APART? OK. YEAH. SO WE SAW THIS AT THE LAST PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AND I'M ASSUMING THAT WE'LL SEE THE PUD AT THE UPCOMING YES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING.

AND I MEAN, I'M PROBABLY BRINGING THIS UP KIND OF OUT OF LINE ON THIS PROJECT BECAUSE I THINK FROM WHAT I SEE THERE.

JUST BRIEFLY, IT'S IT LOOKS LIKE A GREAT PROJECT, AND IT'S I THINK IT'S WORTHY OF THE ABANDONMENT. I BRING IT UP ON THIS PROJECT BECAUSE WE'VE DONE THIS IN THE PAST ALREADY.

IT FELL THROUGH.

AND SO IF WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO KNOW THESE TWO THINGS AT THE SAME TIME, YEAH, YEAH, WE ARE HAPPY TO PROVIDE WHATEVER INFORMATION THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED TO US.

IT'S DIFFICULT FOR US TO, YOU KNOW, SOMETIMES TRY TO PULL THAT OUT OF FOLKS.

SOMETIMES WE'RE RELUCTANT TO DO SO.

BUT I THINK IN THIS CASE, THEY'RE, YOU KNOW, AND SOMETIMES THEY DO A SPECULATIVE.

THEY SAID, IF I COULD ABANDON THIS LITTLE AND THEN I CAN, I'LL DEVELOP A PROJECT AROUND SOMETHING LATER SO THAT A FAIR AMOUNT OF THAT WILL.

WE CAN ADDRESS THIS THIS AFTERNOON IN THE MOTION.

I THINK THAT SOUNDS GOOD.

THANK YOU. ANYTHING ELSE? THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT.

IF WE COULD GO THROUGH 11 CC, I THINK I HAVE.

THIS IS ABOUT THE TOWER TRUCK, A LADDER TRUCK.

I THINK I'VE MISUNDERSTOOD THE POINT OF THAT I THOUGHT WE WERE PROPOSING IN ADDITION TO THE ONE CENTRAL, WE WERE REPLACING IT.

BUT YOU'RE TELLING ME THAT THIS IS MORE TO COVER THE WEST END OF THE AIRPORT.

SO WE HAVE ONE AT THE AIRPORT.

THIS IS TO COVER THE FAR WEST AND WE HAVE ONE AT THE AIRPORT.

WE HAVE TWO LADDER AIRCRAFTS NOW.

WE HAVE A TOWER AND A LADDER.

OK. GOOD MORNING, CHIEF.

HOW ARE YOU? HOW ARE YOU DOING? ALL RIGHT. JUST NEW ONES GOING WHERE AT SEVEN? STATION SEVEN, STATION SEVEN.

WE CURRENTLY HAVE A 2002 AERIAL TRUCK HERE, STATION ONE, AND WE ALSO HAVE ONE AT STATION FOUR. ACTUALLY THE ONE AT FOUR IS USED TO BE AT SEVEN FOR SOME PERIOD OF TIME.

WE MOVED IT BACK IN BECAUSE IT'S SO MUCH DEVELOPMENT IN THE STATION FOUR AREA.

SURE. BUT RIGHT NOW, WITH ALL THE DEVELOPMENT GOING ON IN THE WEST END, WE'RE GOING TO REPLACE THAT PUMPER, WHICH IS A TWO THOUSAND FIVE PUMPER.

IT'S REALLY CLOSE TO ITS END.

WE'RE GOING TO MOVE IT OVER TO RESERVES AND PUT THAT AERIAL THERE.

IT'LL BE MANNED WITH FOUR MEN ON IT.

THE ONLY THING CHANGING, IT'LL GIVE US AERIAL ACCESS ON THE WEST END WEST OF 61ST STREET. WE HAVE OVER TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY TWO HUNDRED FORTY MID TO HIGH RISE STRUCTURES AND THAT SAME THING OVER 30 FOOT.

AND NOW THE BEACH HOUSES HAVE TO DO WITH 16 FOOT UP.

YEAH. SO THIS WILL GIVE US THIS WILL ENHANCE THE LEVEL OF FIRE PROTECTION TO SERVICE TO THE WEST END AND ALSO REPLACE THE PIECE OF EQUIPMENT THAT REALLY, REALLY NEEDS TO BE REPLACED. I JUST I JUST DIDN'T UNDERSTAND THIS, AND IT WAS SO MANY, SO MANY TALL STRUCTURES ARE GOING UP OUT THERE, AS YOU SAY, JUST EVEN BEACH HOUSES.

AND THIS HAS COME UP IN OUR ISO REVIEW, AND WE WILL PROBABLY GET A BUMP IN OUR ISO, WHICH

[00:25:04]

WILL HELP EVERYBODY ON THEIR FOOTPRINT.

WHAT THAT MEANS. THAT'S THAT'S THE INTERNAL SERVICE ORGANIZATION THAT DOES THESE REVIEWS FOR INSURANCE RATINGS.

AND WHAT THEY'LL DO IS THEY'LL COME IN AND LOOK, BECAUSE THAT'S ONE OF THE AREAS WE GET DINGED ON IS THAT WE DON'T HAVE AN AERIAL APPARATUS.

AND THIS LOWERS OUR RISK FACTOR, THEREFORE LOWERING PEOPLE.

AND WE'RE ACTUALLY WE HAVE SOME NEWS ON THAT FRONT FROM THE BUILDING CODE FRONT THAT'LL BE COMING TO YOU. WE'VE GOT BUMPED ON THAT, TOO.

SO WE'RE DOING REALLY WELL. I JUST I JUST WANT EVERYBODY TO UNDERSTAND WHAT WHAT YOU'RE DOING WITH THIS, AND I FULLY SUPPORT THAT.

AND AS I SAID, I GET CONFUSED ABOUT WHAT'S A LADDER, WHAT'S A TOWER, YOU KNOW, BOTH I WOULD SAY ABOUT THIS, LET'S SAY A FIREFIGHTER WOULDN'T SAY THAT THEY BOTH.

NO, NO.

AS YOU KNOW, WE PASSED A AGREEMENT WITH THE LIBRARY AND YOU ADDRESS THE FUNDING.

THIS THERE'S ACTUALLY THIS IS THIS IS FORTUITOUS BECAUSE WE WERE STARTING TO SCRATCH OUR HEADS WHAT WE WERE GOING TO DO ABOUT THIS, BUT WE HAVE THE FUNDING COMING FROM THE LIBRARY, WHICH IS WHICH IS GOOD.

BUT THE OTHER THING IS THAT WE HAVE A PIECE OF SURPLUS EQUIPMENT THAT WE USE AN OLD CHIPPER MACHINE THAT WE WERE USING, WHICH WE'RE NOT DOING THAT ANYMORE.

HOW MUCH WE SOLD ABOUT A MILLION DOLLARS, REALLY FOR SIX HUNDRED THOUSAND, WE SOLD IT ON THE OLSEN, ABOUT FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE.

YOU SAY WE'RE NOT MAKING MULCH OUT OF PALM FRONDS ANYMORE? THAT'S EXACTLY RIGHT BECAUSE NOBODY WANTED IT.

AND SO, YEAH, SO I MEAN, WE TOOK ADVANTAGE OF THE MARKET RIGHT NOW BECAUSE I IMAGINE THAT'S LIKE EVERY OTHER PIECE OF EQUIPMENT YOU CAN'T BUY RIGHT NOW.

WE SAY, WHAT'S THE LEAD TIME ON THIS? YEAH, ON THE FIRE TRUCK.

YEAH, WELL, ACCELERATED.

WE FIT A CALCULATION WHERE WE CAN GET WITHIN A 12 MONTH BUILD FOR ABOUT A YEAR.

FOUR HUNDRED AND FIFTY THREE THOUSAND OF THIS IS GOING TO BE OUT OF THE LIBRARY.

THAT'S RIGHT. LIBRARY AND THE BALANCE OF IT, IT'S GOING TO COME.

WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO IS WE'RE GOING TO BE A LITTLE SHUFFLING IN.

THE REST OF IT ACTUALLY COMES FROM THE INFRASTRUCTURE SET ASIDE.

BUT THIS WILL ACTUALLY BUY SOME OF THE OTHER STUFF WE WERE BUYING OUT OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE, SAYS CHIPPER MONEY.

SO IT'S NO GOOD THING.

I GOT A QUESTIONS REAL QUICK AND I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THIS BESIDES A 30 MINUTE PHONE CALL, SO I'LL TRY TO READ YOUR BOOK.

YEAH. SO, SO IS THE FIRE ON THE FUNDING SOURCE.

THE TRUCK IS COSTING A MILLION BUCKS, JUST OVER JUST OVER A MILLION FOUR HUNDRED FOUR HUNDRED AND FIFTY FROM THE LIBRARY REBATE.

AND THEN THE INFRASTRUCTURE AND DEBT SERVICE WILL TAKE THE REST OF IT.

OK, SO THE TRUCK AT YOUR YOUR PLATFORM TRUCK AT STATION ONE IS ONE HUNDRED AND FIVE FOOT CAPABILITY.

HOW RELIABLE IS THAT TRUCK? ACTUALLY HADN'T BEEN THAT IT IS A TWO THOUSAND TWO, BUT IT'S BEEN PRETTY RELIABLE.

ACTUALLY, WE RUN A DOWNTIME OR DOWNTIME OR BOARD ON.

IT'S BEEN EXCELLENT FOR THE LAST SEVERAL MONTHS, BUT NOW THERE WERE SOME MONTHS THAT THERE WERE A LOT OF PROBLEMS WITH IT. YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT ONE HUNDRED AND FIVE FOOT LADDER TRUCK THAT HAS SOME AGE TO IT.

THOSE TRUCKS LAST TWENTY FIVE YEARS.

SO WHEN YOU HAVE A LEVELING SERVICE, WHICH IS A COMPUTERIZED ITEM, GO OUT.

IT TAKES THE TRUCK OUT OF SERVICE AND COSTS QUITE A LOT OF MONEY TO FIX.

BUT FOR THE LAST SEVERAL MONTHS, THAT TRUCK IS ACTUALLY LAST YEAR IT'S RAN VERY WELL.

DO Y'ALL RUN THAT TRUCK ON ANYTHING BESIDES A NEED FOR A LADDER TRUCK? OR IF WHAT I'VE BEEN TOLD IS THAT IF THE IF THE PUMPER TRUCK GOES OUT, THAT TRUCK DOESN'T, DOESN'T IT GO OUT ON OTHER CALLS? I MEAN, IT'S ONLY STRUCTURE FIRES AND MAJOR ACCIDENTS WHERE WE NEED HEAVY DUTY RESCUE EQUIPMENT. IT CARRIES THAT IT ALSO HAS SOME REPELLENT FOR ANY HIGH RISE ISSUES THAT COME UP. OK. I DON'T RUN IF THEY'RE A FIRST RESPONDER CALLS COMES IN OR ALL BOXES ARE OUT AND SOMEBODY SIX BLOCKS EIGHT BLOCKS AWAY.

I SEND THE NEIGHBORING UNITS TO KEEP RUNNING, KEEP FROM RUNNING A MILLION AND A HALF DOLLAR TRUCK. AND THAT'S WHAT IT COSTS FOR REPLACEMENT ON SOMETHING THAT AN EXTRA MINUTE OR TWO IS NOT GOING TO HURT FOR A TRUCK TO GET THERE.

NOT. GET A HEART ATTACK AROUND THE CORNER OF THAT TRUCK IS GOING.

IT'S FULLY EQUIPPED WITH MEDICAL EQUIPMENT, HAS MEDICAL TRAINED PEOPLE ON IT, BUT I'M NOT GOING TO SEND THEM ACROSS TOWN JUST LIKE MOST OF THE OTHER STATIONS.

THEY RUN WITH ONE PUMPER WHEN THEY'RE OUT.

TRUCK FROM THE NEIGHBORING DISTRICT COMES IN AND COME BACK, AND I DO WANT TO MENTION WE HAVE A GRANT APPLICATION IN PLACE.

THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE COST FOR THIS NEW TRUCK, OF COURSE, GRANTS YOU NEVER KNOW.

WE YOU FOR LAST YEAR DIDN'T GET IT.

WE DID LOOK AT THE GRAND AND WHO GOT AWARDED AND ADJUSTED OUR GRANT TO FIT MORE INTO WHO THEY WERE AWARDING THE GRANT TO.

AND WE ARE TRYING TO REPLACE THAT PARTIALLY WITH THE GRANT AND PARTS OF THE CITY IS GOING TO HAVE TO FUND SOME PART OF IT.

BUT RIGHT NOW THE BANG FOR OUR BUCK BY FAR...

I WAS SHOCKED TO HEAR THAT RECEIVE PHONE CALLS ON THAT.

I DIDN'T FIND OUT TILL THIS MORNING.

[00:30:02]

I'M TRYING TO FIND OUT WHY I CAN'T GET AN ANSWER.

I CAN TELL YOU THE ANSWER.

I THINK THERE ARE SOME THAT FEEL LIKE THERE ARE OTHER PIECES OF EQUIPMENT THAT NEED TO BE REPLACED FIRST, BUT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO DEFER TO YOU ON THAT.

DO THEY KNOW THERE'S TWO TRUCKS FOR WAITING? WELL, AND THAT'S THAT'S SO TELL ME ABOUT THAT TOO.

WE'RE WAITING. YOU'VE ALREADY APPROVED TWO OTHER PUMPERS REVOLVERS, BUT NOT A LADDER OR A LADDER. WE HAVE TWO BUMPERS WE'RE WAITING ON TOO.

YEAH, BUT YOU THINK THAT TRUCK IS WELL-MAINTAINED AND CAN CAN LAST US ANOTHER FEW YEARS UNTIL WE CAN REPLACE IT? YES, SIR. WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO AT LEAST ANOTHER FIVE TO SIX YEARS OUT OF IT JUST TAKES OUT OF IT. TELL YOU THAT'S A BIG TRUCK.

AND HONESTLY, EVEN WITH OTHER AGENCIES, IF YOU GET A DRIVER DONE LIKE THE TRUCK, THEY'RE NOT GOING TO LIKE THE TRUCK. THAT'S WHAT CITY OF HOUSTON, ANYWHERE WE RUN DOWNTOWN REPORTS ON, IT'S RUNNING WELL.

IT'S A TWENTY FIVE YEAR TRUSTEE IS DUE TO BE REPLACED AND PROBABLY ABOUT FOUR OR FIVE MORE YEARS. THE OTHER TWO LADDERS, THE NEW LADDER WE'RE TALKING ABOUT, LIKE SEVENTY FIVE FOOT AND THE ONE THAT WE ALREADY HAVE.

SEVENTY FIVE FOOT, YOU HAVE TWO BRAND NEW BUMPERS THAT ARE ORDERED.

THEY'RE ALREADY COMING IN THE HOUSTON AREA NOW.

THEY'LL BE PROBABLY WITHIN SERVICE WITHIN 30 TO 60 DAYS.

OKAY. AND MY CONCERN IS NOT IF THE DRIVER LIKES THE TRUCK OR NOT.

IT'S MY MY CONCERN IS IF THE DRIVER CAN ACTUALLY PULL IT OUT OF THE GARAGE, YOU KNOW, IT RUNS. IN FACT, I WILL RUN A DOWNTIME DOWNTIME REPORT FOR THAT PARTICULAR THREAT TO THE COUNCIL. OK, SO THAT'D BE GREAT TO SHOW YOU WHERE IT'S AT.

THAT'D BE GREAT. AND THEN MY MY LAST QUESTION IS, YOU KNOW, THERE'S SOME CONCERN THAT OF COURSE, THIS IS CALLED A QUINT TRUCK, QUINT.

SO YOU KNOW, THERE'S SOME CONCERN THAT THE QUINT TRUCK IS NOT AS GOOD AS A PUMPER TRUCK OR A DEDICATED, YOU KNOW, LADDER TRUCK.

AND SO YOU'RE REPLACING A PUMPER TRUCK WITH THE QUINT DOWN ON STATION SEVEN.

AND THERE ARE SOME CONCERN THAT IT'S JUST, YOU KNOW, YOU'RE TAKING A PIECE OF EQUIPMENT THAT CAN DO MULTIPLE THINGS, BUT IN CERTAIN SITUATIONS, IT'S NOT AS GOOD AS THE UPSIDE OF THAT. IF ONE OF THESE OTHER TRUCKS THAT SOMEBODY EXPRESSED CONCERN TO YOU GOES DOWN, I HAVE I'LL HAVE TWO LADDER TRUCKS DOING HERE ON THE ISLAND, NOW OUT ON THE WEST END.

I UNDERSTAND. IDEALLY, THEY WANT A PUMP OR THIS TRUCK HOSE FIVE HUNDRED GALLONS OF WATER IN THE TANK. WE'RE PUTTING TWO HUNDRED FOOT WHAT THEY CALL SPADE LEGS ON IT, WHICH NORMALLY THE PUMPS CARRY ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY.

IT GIVES US MORE ROOM MORE.

A LOT OF THE HOUSES ARE SET BACK TO, SO GIVE US MORE VOTES TO REACH IT.

I'M NOT CONCERNED ABOUT THAT AT ALL.

I DON'T. I HAD NOBODY EXPRESS THAT TO ME.

I DIDN'T HEAR THAT UNTIL THIS MORNING, WHICH IS VERY DISAPPOINTING.

I CAN IMAGINE HOW THE CITY MANAGER AND HIS TEAM FEELS.

WE HAD NO IDEA THAT I MADE ALL THE STATIONS TALK TO ALL THE GUYS.

EVERYBODY'S EXCITED ABOUT IT, SO I APOLOGIZE FOR THE CALL.

YOU GUYS, I WISH THAT HAD BEEN EXPRESSED TO ME, SO LET SOMEBODY KNOW WHAT EXACTLY THEY WERE. THERE'S PROS AND CONS BOTH WAYS.

I THINK WE'RE VERY FORTUNATE TO HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO GET THIS TRUCK, AND I REALLY APPRECIATE YOUR CONSIDERATION.

I THINK IT WILL. QUINTS AREN'T WHAT THEY USED TO BE BACK IN THE EARLY WHEN THE TWINS FIRST STARTED CAME OUT. I COULD SEE THAT ARGUMENT BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T CARRY AS MUCH WATER.

THEY DIDN'T HAVE THE CAPACITY, DIDN'T HAVE THE HOSE CAPACITY.

THIS ONE DOES EVERYTHING A PUMPER DOES.

THAT'S THE POINT I WANT TO MAKE FOR THE PUBLIC BENEFIT THAT THE QUINT IS A PUMPER.

IT'S A LADDER. IT'S GOT ALL OF THAT IN ONE, THREE AND ACTUALLY TWO THOUSAND GALLONS A MINUTE. WOW.

SO THAT'S THE MOVE WITH SOME WATER.

OK, OK, CAN I? IF I CAN CLARIFY SOMETHING TO THE DRIVERS, THE DRIVERS ARE IN THE TOWER NOW.

ARE THEY TAKING GOOD CARE OF IT? AND I'LL SEND THAT REPORT YOU IN THE PAST WEEK.

THAT IS OK. YEAH.

IN THE PAST, I'M TALKING ABOUT YEARS AGO.

OK, LET'S MOVE ON.

AND JUST FOR THE RECORD, THIS TOWER IS IT WAS A 2000 AND 2002.

THE ONE THAT IT REPLACED IS STILL IN SERVICE ON JAMAICA BEACH.

OK, ONE HUNDRED THIRTY FIVE.

SO, OK, JUST JUST VERY QUICKLY, MAYOR, IF I MAY.

YOU SAID THIS ONE TWO THOUSAND TWO TRUCK.

SO ITS LIFE EXPECTANCY IS 2027 AND IT'S GOING TO COST US A MILLION FIVE TO REPLACE.

WE'RE WORKING ON THAT. SO THAT'S IN OUR FIVE YEAR CAPITAL THAT STARTS SEQUESTERING SOME MONEY NOW. YEAH. WELL, WE'VE GOT IT.

WE'VE GOT A GRANT APPLICATION. AND THEN WE'RE ALSO WE'LL BE TALKING TO YOU GUYS IN FUTURE BUDGETING ABOUT HOW WE LOOK AT DIFFERENT REVENUE STREAMS TO FOCUS THE GOOD NEWS ABOUT BIG, BIG PURCHASES LIKE THAT, ESPECIALLY WITH THE TWENTY FIVE YEAR LIFE.

IF YOU HAVE SEVERAL OPTIONS TO DO THAT, IT DOESN'T HAVE TO NECESSARILY BE A CASH PURCHASE. SOMETIMES YOU'LL HAVE A WINDFALL.

WE'LL SELL SOME RIGHT AWAY.

SOMEBODY MIGHT BUY SOME PROPERTY OUT BY HOME DEPOT, SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

AND THEN YOU HAVE YOU HAVE A WINDFALL OF CASH THAT YOU CAN USE FOR THINGS LIKE THAT OR THE LIBRARY MONEY OR THINGS LIKE THAT.

SO WE'RE IN GOOD SHAPE. I'M NOT AT ALL CONCERNED ABOUT THAT.

THANK YOU, CHIEF. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

ANYTHING ELSE, DAVID? YES, ACTUALLY.

12A, THIS IS THE NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION.

[00:35:01]

I WANT TO BE VERY CLEAR WITH THE PUBLIC INTEREST THAT THESE COS ARE COMING OUT OF TWO SILOS, NEITHER OF WHICH ARE PROPERTY TAX.

ONE IS USE FEES ON THE WATER AND SEWER, AND THE OTHER IS A FORM OF SALES TAX.

SO ASIDE FROM THAT, IDC IS ALLOCATED.

SO THIS IS NOT YOUR PROPERTY TAX.

BE THE BUILDING A SOCCER FIELD OR IN THIS CASE, GARBAGE.

START BUYING GARBAGE. THANK YOU.

IN THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR GALVESTON, WE'RE REALLY LUCKY BECAUSE YOU GOT TO FIGURE OVER HALF OF YOUR SALES TAX DOESN'T COME FROM PEOPLE THAT LIVE HERE.

SO HOW OFTEN DO THE KIDS IN GALVESTON GET TO BENEFIT FROM SOMETHING THAT'S PAID FOR THAT? YOU ONLY PAY HALF PRICE FOR THAT.

PEOPLE COMING IN FROM HOUSTON THAT ARE PAYING THE REST OF IT, IT'S PRETTY SLICK DEAL.

I JUST I JUST WANT TO MAKE THAT, THANK YOU.

AND THE PAY OFF ON THAT.

JUST FOR THE PUBLIC'S KNOWLEDGE IS SEVEN YEARS ON THE MARKET, THE SOCCER FIELD AND ITS FIVE YEARS ON THE THE OTHER HAND.

AND THERE'S NO PREPAYMENT PENALTY IF WE DECIDE TO PAY IT OFF THERE.

BUT THE RATES ARE WHERE WE'RE TRYING TO GET YOUR HANDS ON THAT.

YEAH, EXACTLY. SO THAT'S WHY WE'RE THAT'S WHY WE WOULD HAVE JUMPED IT ON THIS AGENDA BECAUSE WE DO KNOW THERE'S GOING TO BE SOME INCREASES COMING RIGHT.

MIKE, AT THIS TIME, THIS MIGHT BE A TIME YOU JUST MIGHT WANT TO INTRODUCE VERY QUICKLY THE INDIVIDUALS. WE DID HAVE A LONG TERM FINANCIAL ADVISOR WHO RECENTLY RETIRED AND THE COMPANY THAT HE WAS WITH HUNTINGTON CAPITAL MARKETS IS STILL OUR FINANCIAL ADVISORS.

THEY'RE HERE THIS MORNING.

RYAN O'HARA IS HEAD OF THE TEXAS OFFICE, I GUESS.

YES, SIR. AND YOU INTRODUCE YOUR CAMERON THATCHER AND [INAUDIBLE] ABRAHAM KIND OF ROUND OUT OUR TEAM, SO WE'RE HAPPY TO BE REPRESENTING YOUR FINANCIAL ADVISORS.

THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. APPRECIATE IT.

AND OUR VALIANT COUNCILMAN SANDERSON RIGHT? AND BARON IS ON THE SCREEN RIGHT NOW.

GOOD MORNING, BARON. MORNING! MORNING. ALL RIGHT.

ANYTHING ELSE, DAVID? NO, I'M GOOD. THANK YOU.

ONE QUICK THING ON THAT BARON AND RYAN GOT TOGETHER PRIMARILY BEAR AND FIGURED OUT HOW TO COMBINE WHAT WOULD NORMALLY PERHAPS BE TWO SALES INTO ONE, WHICH SAVES US ABOUT ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS FOR THE COST OF ISSUANCE.

AND RYAN, HIS TEAM, DONE A GOOD JOB PUTTING TOGETHER THE FINANCING NUMBERS FOR US.

THANK YOU, MIKE. APPRECIATE IT, JOHN PAUL.

I GOT MY CAMERA QUESTIONS ANSWERED.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, MURRAY. I JUST RECEIVED A TEXT FROM SOMEONE SAYING THAT THEY CAN'T HEAR US ONLINE.

CAN WE TURN THE VOLUME UP? OK, SO MY QUESTION, I JUST HAVE ONE QUESTION, AND IT'S ON 11 X, AND IT HAS TO DO WITH APPROVING THE INCREASE ON THE AIRPORT, THE AIRPORT WASTEWATER EXPANSION.

AND MY QUESTION IS, DOES ANY OF THIS INCREASE COME FROM ALL THE MANY ISSUES THAT WE'VE HAD WITH THEM BREAKING PIPES AND SO FORTH AND SO ON? THIS IS THE WATER SIDE. OK.

EXCUSE ME. SO THESE ARE THE FENCING WAS TAKEN OUT AS A VALUE ENGINEERING TASK WHEN WE'RE GOING THROUGH AT THE BEGINNING OF THE PROJECT SOME YEARS BACK AND SOME OF THE FENCE IS JUST IN A STATE OF DISREPAIR AND NEEDS TO BE REESTABLISHED TO MAINTAIN SECURITY.

THE OTHER PIECE OF THE WING WALLS AROUND WATER METER VAULT WHEN THEY'RE INSTALLING IT WITH ALL THE FITTINGS, THERE WASN'T ENOUGH SPACE TO SIGHT IT REALLY CLOSE, SO THEY HAD TO RELOCATE IT. NOW IT'S IN THE [INAUDIBLE] SLOPE, AND THIS IS TO PROTECT YOU SO THAT IT DOESN'T. OK, GOOD.

THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME. AND KETO'S BEEN GOOD TO YOU WITH THE GOOD WORK.

WE SHOULD TELL YOU THIS.

I PROBABLY CAN ANSWER THIS QUESTION, BUT I'M GOING TO.

SO HERD'S LANE..GOT THE PAYMENT SCHEDULE THAT I SENT IT TO JOHN.

IT'LL BE GONE.

BUT NOW IT'S LIKE IT'LL BE COMPLETED BY THE END OF THE MONTH, OK, END OF FEBRUARY.

KEEP IT WELL, BUT KEEP IN MIND AND I'LL I CAN JUMP AHEAD AND GIVE THIS TO YOU NOW.

BUT THEY CANNOT, AND MOST CONTRACTORS DON'T LAY ASPHALT WHEN TEMPERATURES LESS THAN 60 DEGREES, SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE WAITING ON.

BROADWAY STILL WORKING LIKE THIS? DO IT YOURSELF, PROJECT JESUS.

DID YOU WANT HIM TO COME BACK TO YOU? ANYTHING YOU WANT TO ASK ABOUT THE AGENDA? OK, I HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS.

REAL QUICKLY. ITEM EIGHT A.

IF I COULD, PLEASE.

I MAY HAVE MISUNDERSTOOD THIS.

IT'S ABOUT THE FINANCIAL INCENTIVES AND THINGS.

IT MAKES A COMMENT.

I HAVE TO GO BACK AND LOOK THROUGH THIS WHERE IT IS THAT THE FINANCIAL INCENTIVE PROGRAM

[00:40:05]

IS AVAILABLE TO ANY STRUCTURE IN A HISTORIC DISTRICT.

IS THAT WHAT HAPPENS ON THE SCREEN BEHIND THESE? OH, I'M SORRY. ANTHONY, GOOD MORNING.

GOOD MORNING. GOOD MORNING.

THE FINANCIAL INCENTIVES THAT'S AVAILABLE TO ANY STRUCTURE IN HISTORIC DISTRICT, JUST NOT A GALVESTON LANDMARK STRUCTURE.

IS THAT CORRECT? THERE ARE TWO PARTS OF THE PROGRAM.

ONE IS DESIGNATION OF NEW STRUCTURES, AND THAT GETS A THIRTY FIVE PERCENT REDUCTION IN THE CITY TAXES. AND THAT'S ONLY FOR GOVERNMENTS AND LANDMARKS OUTSIDE OF A HISTORIC DISTRICT. SO THE STAFF REPORT IS NOTING THAT THIS PARTICULAR DESIGNATION IS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR THAT BECAUSE THEY'RE LOCATED WITHIN A HISTORIC DISTRICT.

OK. THERE'S ANOTHER PROGRAM CALLED SUBSTANTIAL REHABILITATION, AND ALL HISTORIC PROPERTIES ARE ELIGIBLE FOR THAT ONE.

AND THIS STRUCTURE WOULD BE APPROPRIATE FOR THAT THEN.

CORRECT, IF THEY START TO DO A RESTORATION, THEN THEY WOULD BE ELIGIBLE FOR THAT ONE.

OK. AND THANK YOU.

THERE'S A TIME LIMIT ON THIS IS THEY'RE NOT CAPPED TO THE REDUCTION FOR A PERIOD OF TIME.

CORRECT. FOR NEW [INAUDIBLE] LANDMARKS, THE PERIOD OF TIME IS FIVE YEARS.

FOR SUBSTANTIAL REHABILITATION.

IT'S 10 YEARS. OK, THANK YOU.

CAN I ASK? YES, MA'AM.

SO WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO LANDMARK A PROPERTY? GENERALLY SPEAKING, AT THE AGE REQUIREMENT IS 50 YEARS OLD OR OLDER, AND THEN THERE'S A LIST OF CRITERIA THAT I CAN EMAIL TO THE COMMISSION.

I'M SORRY, THE COUNCIL.

OKAY, THANK YOU.

SOUNDS GOOD. THANK YOU, CATHERINE.

APPRECIATE THAT. THANK YOU.

VERY GOOD. ITEM 8C, THIS IS OUR THE PUD AND SO FORTH THERE.

I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS ON THAT.

FIRST OF ALL, I NEVER I DIDN'T REALIZE THAT 3005 WAS CALLED THE BLUE WATER HIGHWAY, BUT ANYWAY, BUT THAT'S NOT NELLIE.

IT WAS ONE DAY LAST SUMMER WHEN I THINK MOST PEOPLE REFER TO THE PART OF IT BEING OVER IN BRAZORIA COUNTY. YEAH, I JUST SAW THAT ON THE.

I THOUGHT, THAT'S INTERESTING.

JUST A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS ON THAT ON THIS PARCEL D WHERE THEY'RE PUTTING THE RENTAL STRUCTURE ON THAT CAN COME ON UP.

I SEE YOU SHAKING YOUR HEAD THERE ON PARCEL D, THE COMMERCIAL.

WHEN WE APPROVE THIS PUD THEY CAN'T EXPAND INTO PARTIAL DEAL WITH OTHER COMMERCIAL.

SHOW ACTIVITIES UNLESS THEY COME BACK AND PRESENT WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO DO THERE, IS THAT CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT.

SO WHAT WE'RE APPROVING THIS, WE'RE PROVING ONLY THAT STRUCTURE FOR RENTAL RIGHT THERE BECAUSE THAT PARCEL D IS A LARGE STRUCTURE AND WE'RE NOT APPROVING THAT TO BE ANY OTHER COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES.

IT'S JUST WHAT'S BEEN APPLIED FOR.

OK. STRICTLY.

YES, MA'AM. WELL, ALONG THE SAME LINES.

AND I'M JUST GOING TO ASK MY QUESTIONS WHEN WE WERE HAVING THE HEARING, BUT I MIGHT AS WELL JUMP ON IT NOW.

THE APPLICANT WAS RUNNING THIS BUSINESS WITHOUT PERMISSION.

THIS PAST SUMMER AND THEY WERE RUNNING IT OUT OF A CONTAINER.

SO WHAT ARE WE REQUIRING THEM TO ACTUALLY PUT UP A BUILDING THAT MEETS THE, YOU KNOW, THAT LOOKS LIKE A NICE BUILDING, THAT IS A NICE BUILDING THAT MEETS WITH THE NEIGHBORHOODS THAT ARE NEARING BECAUSE I DO HAVE A LOT OF CONSTITUENTS THAT ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF THIS.

THERE'S A BUILDING THAT'S THAT'S GOING TO BE PROPOSED.

YES, THE APPLICANT IS ACTUALLY HERE, IF YOU WOULD, IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET SOME MORE DETAIL ON THAT. I WOULD RATHER KEEP THAT TO THE HEARING THIS AFTERNOON IF I COULD.

BUT YEAH, YEAH, THERE IS A BUILDING, OK? AND IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT ALL THE ACTIVITY WOULD WOULD BE WITHIN THAT BUILDING.

THE THE RENTAL ITSELF IS NOT A WALK UP RENTAL.

IT'S STRICTLY YOU CALL AHEAD AND THEY THE THE OPERATOR OF THE BUSINESS WOULD DELIVER THOSE GOLF CARTS TO WHATEVER LOCATION YOU KNOW THEY'RE BEING REQUESTED TO.

SO IT'S IT'S NOT ANYTHING HAVING TO DO WITH AN ON SITE, YOU KNOW, CUSTOMER BASED SYSTEM.

IT'S ALL DELIBERATE.

I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THE BEACH ACCESS.

THERE'S BEEN SOME COMMENTS THAT THERE WAS BEACH ACCESS AND THAT'S BEEN CLOSED OFF AND IT'S NOT AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC.

AND COULD YOU COMMENT ON THAT?

[00:45:03]

LET'S SEE. I BELIEVE THE ACCESS IS RIGHT ALONG THREE DOUBLE FIVE WELL, NOT THE BEACH ACCESS, BUT THEY HAD A PATHWAY TO GET TO.

YES, THAT'S WHAT I'M REFERRING TO.

THAT'S RIGHT. AND I DON'T BELIEVE THE THAT PATHWAY HAS BEEN IN ANY WAY OBSTRUCTED.

IT'S IT'S STILL EXISTS.

IT'S NOT AN APPROVED PATHWAY AS SUCH, BUT THAT'S STILL AVAILABLE FOR YES.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

THAT ANSWERS THAT.

OK, THANK YOU. TIM, I APPRECIATE IT.

ANYTHING ELSE? ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THAT ITEM? THANKS VERY MUCH. AND, LOOK HERE.

ITEM 11 C, BRIAN, IT IS FOR THE FOR THE EVERGREEN SOLUTIONS HERE. GOOD MORNING, KEN.

HOW ARE YOU? KEN WE DO? OUR COMPENSATION STUDY IS DONE.

IS IT EVERY TWO YEARS THAT WE DO THAT? SO WE'LL DO A COMPLETE COMPENSATION STUDY EVERY FIVE YEARS, BUT WE'LL DO AN UPDATE TO THAT EVERY TWO OR THREE YEARS.

OK, OTHER TWO TO THREE YEARS? YES, SIR. THIS CONTRACT HANDLES.

THEN WE HAVE TO, I THINK, TWO EXTENSIONS TO THAT.

SO THIS HANDLES IT FOR A LITTLE WHILE.

YES, THAT'S CORRECT. OK.

THE OTHER QUESTION I HAVE, I KNOW WHEN WE DID THE COMPENSATION STUDY BEFORE, THERE WERE SOME POSITIONS THAT REQUIRED MAYBE LOOKING AT THEM IN A LITTLE DIFFERENT FOCUS, SUCH AS OUR AUDITOR.

I THINK WE HAD SOME CITY SECRETARY POSITIONS ON THAT.

HOW DOES THIS COMPANY DO THEY TAKE SPECIAL ATTENTION IN AND SO FORTH TO THOSE POSITIONS? ABSOLUTELY. SO WHAT THEY'LL DO IS THEY'LL THEY'LL CREATE FOCUS GROUPS.

WE'LL HAVE INTERVIEWS WITH EACH OF THE RESPECTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND WE'LL ALSO GO THROUGH THESE THE RESULTS WITH THE CITY MANAGEMENT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE IDENTIFY WITH THOSE UNIQUE TASKS MIGHT BE IN THESE VARIOUS AREAS.

SO THEY TAKE ALL OF THESE THINGS INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN THEY DO THEIR CLASSIC COMP STUDY. OK, OK, I HAVE A QUESTION.

YES, MA'AM. ONE OF THE OTHER COMPLAINTS WE'VE HAD FROM EMPLOYEES BOARD IN THE PAST STUDIES, AND EVEN I WOULD SAY I FELT THE SAME WAY THAT THEY DID IS THE CITIES THAT THEY USE WERE REALLY NOT COMPATIBLE CITIES TO GALVESTON.

I KNOW WE'RE UNIQUE IN MANY WAYS, BUT THEY WEREN'T NECESSARILY COMPARING TOURISM CITIES AND SO FORTH. SO THAT WAS HOW DO WE GET TO SEE WHAT CITIES ARE BEING CHOSEN OR.

RIGHT? SO IN OUR INITIAL STUDY THAT WE CONDUCTED IN TWENTY FIFTEEN, THAT PROCESS WAS BROUGHT TO COUNCIL AND THERE WAS A COMPLETE VETTING OF THAT OF THOSE SURVEY COMPETITORS AT THAT TIME. WE'LL MAKE SURE THAT ALL OF THE SURVEY COMPETITORS THAT THIS CONSULTING COMPANY RECOMMENDS IS BROUGHT FORTH AS WELL, AND THEY SHOW EXACTLY WHY THEY'RE PICKING WHAT SURVEY COMPETITORS THAT THEY'RE SELECTING AND CITY COUNCIL WILL HAPPEN.

WE DISAGREE WITH THAT OR ASK WHY CITY WOULD BE ABLE TO MAKE THAT CHANGE.

AND WE'VE GOT TO REMEMBER THEY THEY'RE WHAT THEY'RE TASKED WITH NOW IS ALSO NOT ONLY LOOKING AT COASTAL CITIES, BUT ALSO OUR DIRECT COMPETITORS HERE.

YOU KNOW, WE'VE GOT SOME UNIQUE CHALLENGES, OUR GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION, SOME OF THE THE PLANTS THAT ARE JUST NEAR US.

SO THEY'RE HAVING TO FACTOR IN NOT ONLY THE PUBLIC OR PRIVATE SECTOR.

SO THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO CONSIDER ALL THE FACTORS AND THEN PRESENT TO US A PLAN.

THANK YOU KEN, AND I APPRECIATE THAT VERY MUCH.

ONE LAST QUESTION.

WE'RE WIND THIS UP ON OUR CLARIFICATION.

THIS IS NOT SO MUCH A QUESTION, BRIAN.

IT'S 11D.

I JUST WANTED YOU TO MAKE COUNCIL AND THE PUBLIC AWARE OF WHERE WE ARE ON THAT.

YOU LOOK AT THIS, THE PACKING MATERIAL THAT CAN BE A LITTLE CONCERNING AND I'D LIKE FOR YOU. SO I MY SPEAK TO IT.

HE'S BEEN HE'S OUR HERO ON THIS ONE.

ALL THE PUBLIC ENTITIES PRETTY MUCH RECEIVED LETTERS FROM FEMA.

THEY ARE D OBLIGATING CERTAIN PRE-APPROVE.

CERTAIN PROPERLY APPROVED PROJECTS AT THE CITY HAD DONE FOR VARIOUS REASONS, AND THEY'VE DONE IT FOR THEY'VE DONE IT TO THE PORT, AND I THINK I THINK EVERYBODY GOT A LETTER OF SOME TYPE. BUT IN OUR INSTANCE, THEY STILL OWE US A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF MONEY.

THIS HAS ALREADY BEEN CLEARED AND APPROVED.

SO RATHER THAN US WRITING THEM A CHECK, THEY WRITE US A CHECK.

[00:50:02]

WE WRITE THEM A CHECK, THEY WRITE US A CHECK.

MIKE HAS BEEN WORKING WITH THEM ON THAT TO GET THAT CLEARED UP, BUT THEY OWE US SUBSTANTIALLY MORE THAN WHAT THEY ARE ASKING FOR US TO BE OBLIGATED FOR CLOSE ENOUGH TO THE END OF THE PROCESS. NOW THAT WE'RE COMPARING NUMBERS AND THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE COMING DOWN HERE NEXT WEEK, WE'LL BE TALKING IN SOME DETAIL WITH THEM ABOUT OUTSTANDING ISSUES AND OUTSTANDING PROJECTS.

BUT WE'VE PUSHED ALONG WITH THEM UPWARDS OF 80 PROJECT WORKSHEETS TO FEMA IN THE LAST 13 MONTHS. AND IT'S AND IT'S THAT IT'S JUST ABOUT TO BE ON FEMA'S DESK TO GIVE FINAL APPROVAL OF THINGS LIKE OUR LIST STATIONS, WHERE TESTS OF WROBLEWSKI IS IS STILL DEALING WITH THEM ON THAT. FROM THE STANDPOINT OF, YOU KNOW, THEY WERE UNDERGROUND, YOU COULDN'T TELL WHAT THE DAMAGE WAS UNTIL YOU GOT IT OUT AND WE'RE TRYING TO GET OUR ACTUAL COST BACK. SHE'S BEEN VERY SUCCESSFUL.

THE CITY STAFF HAS SUPPORTED HER WELL AND WE'RE JUST GOING TO TRY AND WRAP IT UP IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CITIZENS OF GALVESTON.

SO WE'RE BEING NET POSITIVE.

BUT ALSO, I JUST WANT I WANT TO THANK STAFF.

THIS HAS BEEN A LONG PROCESS.

I THINK WE HAD THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTY EIGHT, OH FIVE HUNDRED AND EIGHTEEN PW'S OUT THERE AFTER IKE. WE'RE PRETTY WELL WINDING THIS UP AND THANK YOU, MIKE, TO YOUR DEPARTMENT, TESSA. EVERYBODY PUT A LOT OF EFFORT INTO THIS.

APPRECIATE IT. IT'S CRAZY THAT AN ORGANIZATION APPROVES TO SEND YOU THE MONEY.

YOU DO THE WORK.

YOU FINISH THE WORK AND THEN THEY SAY, CHANGED OUR MIND.

WE NEED THAT MONEY BACK. YEAH, IT'S BEEN QUITE A JOURNEY.

THAT'S ALL MY QUESTIONS.

MARIE.

YEAH, YEAH. THE OTHER IS, UM, I DON'T KNOW WHETHER.

I MEAN, I THINK WHAT GLENN IS DOING WITH THE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT PROJECT SERVICE IS BENEFICIAL.

DO WE WANT TO HAVE JUST A LITTLE UPDATE NOW OR FOR THAT AT THE REGULAR 11A GETS ON YOUR DESK HERE, THE PRINTED COPY OF THAT FROM THE[INAUDIBLE] READER? AND SURELY, IF YOU WOULD WANT MARIE, WE COULD HAVE MR. [INAUDIBLE] COME UP.

GLENN, COULD YOU COME ON, SIR? WE DO HAVE, AS I MENTIONED, WE HAVE THE REPORT ON THE AUDIT FOR PRETTY DISCRETE CHANGE ORDERS ON YOUR DESK IN FRONT OF YOU HERE.

GLENN, GOOD MORNING. COULD YOU JUST GIVE US A PARAPHRASE OF WHAT YOUR FINDINGS WERE ON THIS? SURE.

IN THE FIRST FOUR PARAGRAPHS OF THE AUDIT REPORT, THE LOOK IN PARAGRAPH NUMBER THREE.

WHAT WE FOUND THE CHANGE ORDERS DID NOT MATCH THE STAFF REPORTS FISCAL IMPACT SECTIONS UNTIL THE SEVENTH CHANGE ORDER.

THE CITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER PROVIDED THE CITY AUDITOR'S OFFICE WITH CHANGE ORDER NUMBER SEVEN AND THE FINAL STAFF REPORT WITH A PHYSICAL IMPACT REPORT THAT MATCHED TO THE PENNY. THAT WAS AFTER CHANGE ORDER NUMBER SEVEN.

SO THE END RESULT? DAN BUCKLEY, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER WHAT WOULD YOU SAY? AUDITOR'S OFFICE TO UPDATE THE CURRENT STAFF REPORT.

WE INCLUDED AN EXCEL SPREADSHEET TO PREVENT ANY FURTHER CALCULATION ERRORS ON FEBRUARY 12 2021.

MR. BUCKLEY DIRECTED STAFF TO USE THE STAFF REPORT FORMAT AND FORM SO THAT WE CORRECTED THE PROBLEM.

YOU KIND OF PUT IT IN OTHER TERMS, I THINK MEN KIND OF GUIDE ME ON THIS.

THE FINDINGS WERE THAT WHEN THE ACCOUNTING WAS TRANSFERRED TO THE STAFF REPORT, THERE WERE SOME IRREGULARITIES OR THAT WAS NOT DONE TO MATCH UP WITH WHAT IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING. IT WAS REPORTED IN THE STAFF REPORT.

BUT THE ACCOUNTING AND SO FORTH OF THE PROJECT WAS WAS PERFECTLY TIMED, RIGHT? YES. ALL RIGHT. BUT YOU CAN'T HELP BUT WONDER IF COUNCILMAN QUIROGA HADN'T TALKED ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT SO MUCH, WOULD WE HAVE GOTTEN THAT SEVEN HUNDRED AND FORTY TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS BACK, WHERE WOULD THAT HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED? YOU WOULD HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED BECAUSE THE ACCOUNTING WAS ALL CORRECT.

IT WAS PRINTED ON A LETTER THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH OUR FINANCES.

WELL, I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT YOU WITH THE COMPANY, RIGHT? BUT THAT WE WOULD HAVE GOTTEN ANYWAY BECAUSE THE ACCOUNTING, I THINK, YEAH, YEAH, EVERYTHING WAS CORRECT.

IT'S JUST WHEN THEY TRANSFERRED SOME OF THE NUMBERS, THEY DIDN'T GET CORRECTLY TRANSFERRED TO THE STAFF.

YEAH, I DON'T THINK THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT IS INDEPENDENT OF THE ISSUE WITH THE STAFF REPORTS. YEAH, WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT IS AND I'M REFERRING TO THE COMPANY WHO DID

[00:55:04]

THE PROJECT, I'M NOT REFERRING TO THE STAFF, AND I THINK THAT'S ONE OF THE TRUE BENEFITS OF HAVING THIS CONTRACT MANAGEMENT.

SO I'M HAPPY, AS WE PUT IT INTO PLACE, AND.

I AGREE IT'S GREAT WORKING WITH GLENN.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. [INAUDIBLE], REALLY? WELL, THANK YOU.

THANKS, GLENN. APPRECIATE IT.

VERY GOOD. THAT FINISHES.

ITEM THREE. LET'S MOVE TO ITEM 3B.

[3.B. Discussion Of Pocket Park Three (3) Improvements With Council Direction To Staff On Potential Future Paid Parking And Associated Amenities. (B. Hill/Brown - 15 Minutes)]

BE PLEASE GET OUT OF POCKET PARK THREE IMPROVEMENTS IN COUNCIL DIRECTIONS TO STAFF, A POTENTIAL FUTURE PIPELINE AND ASSOCIATED COMMUNITY.

GOOD MORNING. GOOD MORNING, COUNCIL.

THIS COUNCIL BEFORE MR. HILL STARTS, THIS IS ITEM ASSOCIATED WITH ITEM 11 W THAT'S ON OUR REGULAR AGENDA.

SO AS BRENDAN, THIS KIND OF VISITS WITH US TODAY.

KEEP THAT PARTICULAR AGENDA ITEM IN MIND.

GO RIGHT AHEAD. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. MAYOR. COUNCIL, THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME THIS MORNING.

THIS PROJECT IS A IT'S A VERY EXCITING ONE, AND IT'S GOING TO ALLOW US TO CONVERT WHAT I LOVINGLY CALL MOUNT BLACKTOP INTO A USABLE POCKET PARK AGAIN.

YEAH. FOR FOR ANYBODY WHO'S NOT FAMILIAR, COUNTY POCKET PARK THREE WAS UTILIZED IN THE AS A MILLING LAYDOWN LOT FOR THE 3005 IMPROVEMENT PROJECT.

AND SO CURRENTLY THERE IS A MOUNTAIN OF BLACKTOP MILLINGS THAT HAVE TOWERED TO THE SKY.

THOSE ARE BEING REMOVED AND WE'RE TALKING ABOUT WHAT IT IS THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE DOING WITH THAT PROPERTY.

LUCKILY, THERE IS A CMP SELECTED THE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, SELECTED OUR PROJECT FOR A GRANT WHICH ALLOWS US TO SPEND EIGHTY THOUSAND IN IDC FUNDS IN EXCHANGE FOR ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS IN NOA PASS THROUGH MONEY.

SO NOA FEDERAL FUNDS GET PASSED THROUGH TO THE GLOW.

THEY PASS IT THROUGH TO WORTHY PROJECTS, AND THIS IS ONE THAT WAS SELECTED.

ITEM THAT IS ON THE AGENDA TONIGHT IS SIMPLY THE ACCEPTANCE OF THAT GRANT.

WHAT I'D LIKE TO COMMUNICATE WITH YOU ALL TODAY IS AS WE MOVE FORWARD IN THIS PROJECT, STAFF'S VISION FOR THIS IS THAT WE WOULD HAVE TO PARKING LOT AREAS AT THIS PART, TECHNICALLY THREE ONE THAT IS AN 80 A PARKING SPACE CLOSEST TO THE BEACH WITH THE ADEQUATE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES AVAILABLE AND THEN A LARGER PARKING LOT THAT IS CLOSER TO THE BEACH, FOLLOWED BY A SMALLER PARKING LOT THAT'S A LITTLE BIT FURTHER FROM THE BEACH. AND ALL OF THIS WOULD BE ON THAT SAME LOT.

THE CONCEPT IS, AND THIS IS WHAT I'D LIKE TO SPEAK TO YOU ALL ABOUT AS WE AFTER THIS PROJECT IS COMPLETE AND THE ACCESS TO THE BEACH HAS BEEN CREATED.

THE PARKING LOTS HAVE BEEN CREATED.

CITY STAFF FEELS THAT THIS WOULD BE A PRIME OPPORTUNITY FOR US TO IMPLEMENT A PAID PARKING LOT, AT LEAST FOR THE LARGER LOT THAT WILL BE CLOSER TO THE BEACH.

WE COULD USE PAY BY PHONE SIMILAR TO HOW WE HAVE ON THE SEAWALL AND THE DOWNTOWN AREA, AND THIS MONEY COULD GO DIRECTLY INTO THE OTHER POCKET PARK FUNDING THAT WE ALLOCATE FOR IMPROVEMENTS AND AMENITIES.

AND I WOULD JUST LIKE TO PUT IT OUT THERE TO HEAR WHAT AMENITIES? WHAT WOULD WE LIKE TO PRIORITIZE? WHAT VISIONS DO WE HAVE FOR THIS AREA, RIGHT? THE CONTRACT ITSELF, THE CONSTRUCTION THAT WE'RE DOING, THAT'S GOING TO BE PARKING LOTS AND THEN ACCESS.

MOVING FORWARD, I'D JUST LIKE TO HEAR KIND OF SOME OF THE VISION OF THE COUNCIL REGARDING THIS AREA. CURRENTLY, AT THAT AREA, PEOPLE CAN DRIVE ON TO THE BEACH.

WOULD BE ELIMINATING THEM BECAUSE THAT HAS BEEN A BIG ISSUE? YES. SAFTEY ISSUE, TURTLE ISSUE, BIRD ISSUE.

YEAH. SO WHAT MARIE BRINGS UP IS ACTUALLY WE HAVE TWO ACCESS POINTS THAT ARE SIDE BY SIDE THERE. WE HAVE THE POCKET PARK, WHICH ITSELF HAS A PEDESTRIAN COMPONENT.

AND THEN WE ALSO HAVE THE ROAD THAT RUNS RIGHT NEXT TO IT, WHICH ALLOWS FOR DRIVING ON THAT BEACH IN FRONT OF THE POCKET PARK.

THIS PROJECT ITSELF DOES INCLUDE A COMPONENT OF TRYING TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'VE GOT ENOUGH PARKING SPACES IN THAT LAW TO GO TO THE GLOW AND SAY, BE ABLE TO SAY THAT WE'VE OFFSET THE AMOUNT OF PARKING, THE AMOUNT OF ACCESS ON THAT BEACH WITH THE PARKING THAT WE'RE

[01:00:01]

ADDING. THIS WILL BE SOMETHING THAT I'M GOING TO BE TACKLING IN OUR UPDATES TO THE BEACH ACCESS PLAN. SO RIGHT NOW, WE'RE FOCUSING ON GETTING THE AMENITIES THERE, GETTING THE PARKING LOTS THERE AND GETTING THE ACCESS THERE.

THAT THEN WOULD ALLOW US TO MAKE THAT NEGOTIATION IN OUR UPDATES.

AND ALONG THAT SAME LINE, MY ONLY CONCERN ABOUT HAVING PART OF THAT AS PAID PARKING IS WITH THAT PUSH FOR PEOPLE INTO THE NEIGHBORHOODS.

WELL, THE GOOD THING, RIGHT? THE GOOD THING ABOUT THE WAY THAT THE PARK WILL BE SET UP IS THAT THERE WILL BE A SEPARATE LOT THAT WILL BE FREE.

OKAY, SO THERE WILL BE A LOT ON THE EXACT SAME PROPERTY, JUST A LITTLE BIT FURTHER.

A LAND WHERE THAT WOULDN'T BE PAID, THE THE IDEA WOULD JUST BE IF THAT FILLS UP AND PEOPLE ARE WANTING TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE AMENITIES THAT WERE OFFERED AT THAT PARK, THEN THEY WOULD PAY A BUCK FIFTY AN HOUR AND BE ABLE TO TO ACCESS THOSE AMENITIES.

AND THE SORT OF THINGS THAT WE CURRENTLY ADD AT POCKET PARKS INCLUDE ACCESS TO RESTROOMS. BUT THERE WAS PREVIOUSLY A PAVILION AT THIS PARK, SO I DON'T KNOW.

IT JUST DEPENDS ON HOW BIG THE COUNCIL WOULD LIKE TO DREAM IN THIS AREA.

AND WE'LL KIND OF PUT THAT ON OUR INSPIRATION BOARD IN THE OFFICE AND WE'LL SHOOT FOR THAT. IT'S INTERESTING BECAUSE AFTER I WHEN POCKET PARK GOT DEMOLISHED, THERE WERE I DON'T THINK I REALIZED THAT AT THE TIME, BUT THERE WERE SO MANY PEOPLE WITH CHILDREN LIKE, SAY, FROM THE PIRATES BEACH AREA THAT WOULD GO AND USE THAT BECAUSE OF THE AMENITIES, YOU KNOW, AND THEY THEY REALLY MISSED IT BECAUSE EVEN YEARS AGO, WHEN I WORKED THERE AND IN HIGH SCHOOL AND COLLEGE, WE HAD A BIG WE HAD A BIG UPTICK FROM PEOPLE THAT WOULD COME OVER FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD BECAUSE THERE WERE AMENITIES HERE.

I COULD GET SHOWERS AND STUFF THAT YOU TRACK IT ALL BACK TO THE HOUSE AND YOU COULD GET DRINKS AND THE CONCESSION THERE.

IT WAS INTERESTING.

AND THEN MY NEXT QUESTION WOULD BE MORE TOWARD YOU.

IS THERE NOT FINISHED TEXTILES? NO, I GOT THAT FOR YOU.

OK. BECAUSE THERE ARE STILL CROSS STREETS THAT AREN'T PAVED.

THERE'S STILL ENTRANCES TO NEIGHBORHOODS AND WE'RE SHUTTING DOWN THE ASPHALT HILL.

HOW ARE WE GOING TO FINISH THERE FOUR MONTHS OUT SOON AS A FINISHED PRODUCT? RIGHT BACK TO YOU? YEAH. FORTY FIVE.

FORTY FIVE. YEAH.

WELL, I45, IT'S ALREADY BEEN DOCUMENTED THAT THE TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL HADN'T EVEN GOT IT WILL START HERE IN 2024, EVEN WHEN THE SUN BURNS OUT.

SO WE'RE DOING IT WITH OVERHEAD LIGHTS.

SO.

BUT. THEY SAID THEY HAVE FOUR MONTHS LEFT.

OK. BECAUSE I THINK THE CONTRACT WENT THROUGH EITHER JANUARY OR FEBRUARY AND THEN THEY STARTED PAYING PENALTIES.

YEAH. THEY'VE GOT FOUR MONTHS LEFT.

AND, RANDY, DO YOU HAVE ANY MORE [INAUDIBLE]? NO, REALLY.

YOU KNOW THIS THIS IS KIND OF IN MY HEAD.

IT'S PHASE ONE FOR POCKET PARK THREE.

WE'VE WE'VE GOT THE THE CMP GRANT THAT WILL ALLOW US TO PUT IN AN ACCESS AND ALLOW US TO PUT IN PARKING. AND I WAS JUST WHILE WE WERE ON THE SUBJECT.

I WANTED TO REACH OUT TO THE COUNCIL AND JUST GET AN IDEA FOR WHAT VISION YOU ALL HAD FOR THE AREA SO THAT WE COULD START PLANNING FOR THAT INTERNALLY.

WHEN DO YOU SET A DEADLINE YOU NEED OUR INPUT SO COUNCIL COULD GET BACK WITH YOU INDIVIDUALLY ON THIS? NO, NO, REALLY, REALLY NO DEADLINE JUST WANTED TO MAKE YOU GUYS AWARE OF WHAT WE WERE UP TO AND TO GET IN TOUCH WITH US.

BECAUSE AS AS THE CMP CYCLE CONTINUES AND CONTINUES TO MARCH, I'VE HAD GOOD SUCCESS IN THE PAST OF GETTING THOSE GRANTS AND BEING ABLE TO DO SOME PRETTY COOL IMPROVEMENTS AT BEACH ACCESSES. AND SO AS WE GROW THAT SIDE OF THE PROGRAM, I'D REALLY LIKE YOUR GUYS INPUT BECAUSE YOU GUYS KEEP YOUR FINGERS ON THE PULSE OF WHAT FOLKS NEED.

RANDY IS DOING A GREAT JOB FOR US, AND WE WERE VERY BLESSED TO HAVE SOMEBODY OF HIS CALIBER IN THIS POSITION.

VERY MUCH SO.

WELL, COUNCIL IF AS MR. HILLS REQUESTED, IF YOU HAVE INPUT ON THIS PART, PLEASE LET HIM KNOW.

I KNOW MARIE WILL STAY IN TOUCH WITH HIM AS WE GO.

GO THROUGH THIS, SO THANK YOU, BRANDON.

APPRECIATE THANK YOU, GUYS. WE APPRECIATE YOUR VOTES AND ALSO [INAUDIBLE] Y'ALL TAKE CARE AND WE'RE GOING TO HEAD UP TO HOUSTON FOR THE ASPPA MEETING.

I KNOW YOU'RE ON THEIR BOARD.

YES SIR. CONGRATULATIONS ON THAT. THANK YOU ALL SO MUCH.

APPRECIATE YOUR TIME. YOU KNOW I'M ALSO THE TREASURER FOR THE TEXAS SHORE AND BEACH AND SORRY THAT I COULDN'T BE THERE.

IT'S ALL GOOD. I'LL GIVE JERRY YOUR LOVE.

OK, BRING HER A TO GO BOX.

ALL RIGHT. THANKS, BRANDON.

LET'S MOVE TO ITEM 3C.

PLEASE JANELLE.

[3.C. Discussion Of The Draft Pelican Island Bridge MOU (Brown/Staff-45 Min)]

3C DISCUSSION OF THE DRAFT PELICAN ISLAND BRIDGE MOU.

[01:05:02]

COUNCIL THIS IS A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING THAT IS BEFORE US HERE.

I WANT TO GIVE YOU A LITTLE BACKGROUND WHERE WE ARE ON THIS AND WHY WE'RE VISITING WITH IT, VISITING ON THIS TODAY.

IN 2014, MAYBE EARLY PART OF 2015.

COUNTY COMMISSIONER RYAN [INAUDIBLE] CAME TO COUNCIL AND HE PRESENTED TO COUNCIL AT THAT TIME THAT THE COUNTY WAS WANTING TO BE THE CHAMPION AND BE THE SIGNATURE ON WHAT THEY CALL AN ADVANCE FUNDING AGREEMENT TO MOVE FORWARD THE PROJECT OF PUTTING UP BUILDING A NEW BRIDGE FOR PELICAN ISLAND BRIDGE AND THAT STARTED A CHAIN OF EVENTS THAT THE COUNTY WAS CHAMPIONING IT CHAMPIONING TO MOVE THIS FORWARD.

THERE'S TWO PORTIONS OF THIS PELICAN ISLAND BRIDGE PROJECT.

ONE IS THE ADVANCED FUNDING AGREEMENT.

WE'LL TALK MORE ABOUT THAT IN JUST A SECOND.

THAT THE COUNTY AND TXDOT ARE WORKING ON AND NEGOTIATING AND FINALIZING HERE.

AND THEN THERE'S A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING, WHICH IS REALLY A CONTRACT THAT OUTLINES THE FUNDING OF THE BRIDGE AND THE PARTICIPANTS THAT TAKE PART IN THIS FUNDING AND WHAT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THESE PARTICIPANTS ARE.

CITY OF GALVESTON IS ONE OF THOSE PARTICIPANTS.

WE ARE NOT A PARTY OF THE AFA.

IT IS BETWEEN THE COUNTY AND TXDOT, BUT WE ARE A PARTY OF THE MOU.

WHEN COMMISSIONER [INAUDIBLE] DECIDED NOT TO RUN AGAIN AS COUNTY COMMISSIONER, THIS BATON WAS PICKED UP BY COMMISSIONER KEN CLARK AT THE COUNTY, AND COMMISSIONER CLARK WAS THE CHAMPION AT THE COUNTY'S LEVEL TO CONTINUE TO MOVE NOT ONLY THE AFA AGREEMENT WITH TXDOT FORWARD, BUT THE MOU AGREEMENT FORWARD ALSO AND WORKING WITH THE PARTICIPANTS TO COME TOGETHER WITH A WITH A MOU DOCUMENT THAT WAS ACCEPTABLE TO ALL THE PARTICIPANTS.

COMMISSIONER CLARK HAS DONE A WONDERFUL JOB MOVING THAT FORWARD OVER ALL THESE YEARS, AND I JUST WANT TO PUBLICLY THANK HIM AGAIN FOR ALL OF HIS EFFORTS, RECENTLY.

AND I SAY RECENTLY, IT'S BEEN A LITTLE WHILE BACK.

YOU PROBABLY SAW IN THE NEWS THAT THE COUNTY, THOUGH, HAS REACHED A POINT THAT THEY DO NOT WANT TO BE THE CHAMPION OF THIS PELICAN ISLAND BRIDGE ANYMORE.

AND THERE'S A NUMBER OF REASONS FOR THAT.

I HAVE DISCUSSED THIS WITH JUDGE HENRY, AND SO AT THAT POINT, THE CITY FELT IT WAS APPROPRIATE FOR THE CITY TO PICK THAT BATON NOW BEING HAND OFF HANDED OFF FROM COMMISSIONER CLARK TO MOVE THIS FORWARD FOR THE SAKE OF OUR COMMUNITY.

THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT NOT ONLY FOR TEXAS A&M, BUT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PELICAN ISLAND AREA OVER THERE.

SO THE CITY, WE HAVE BEEN WORKING DILIGENTLY HERE TO PICK THAT BATON UP ON THE MOU, KNOWING THAT THE COUNTY IS CONTINUING TO WORK WITH TXDOT ON THE AFA AND AND WE CAN TALK MORE ABOUT THE DETAILS OF THAT IF YOU'D LIKE.

BUT RIGHT NOW, WHAT IS BEFORE YOU IS THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING THAT HAS BEEN WITH MANY. MANY MEETINGS BETWEEN MANY OF THE PARTICIPANTS IS AT A POINT NOW THAT I FEEL THAT WE NEED TO BRING THIS TO COUNCIL AND GET DIRECTION AND GUIDANCE AND QUESTIONS ANSWERED CONCERNING THIS MOU.

THE TIMELINE ON THIS TXDOT WOULD BE THE MANAGEMENT ON THE CONSTRUCTION TXDOT WANTS TO GET THIS AFA IN THIS MOU.

THEY WOULD LIKE TO GET THAT DECIDED UPON AND AND APPROVED AND SIGNED WITHIN A WITHIN THIS YEAR.

THEY WOULD LIKE TO HAVE IT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE WITHIN THE NEXT SIX MONTHS OR SO.

BUT THEY DID SAY THIS CALENDAR YEAR THEY WOULD LIKE TO FINALIZE BOTH THESE DOCUMENTS.

AND THEY ALSO TXDOT THEN IS SAYING THERE WILL BE ABOUT A TWO YEAR CONSTRUCTION PHASE HERE.

[01:10:09]

THE CONSTRUCTION AND SO FORTH WOULD START SOMEWHERE AROUND.

THEY FEEL AROUND 23, 24.

SO THAT WOULD FINISH THIS PROJECT SOMEWHERE AROUND 25, 26.

AS YOU MAY KNOW, IDC HAS ALREADY ALLOCATED $5 MILLION AND WE'LL TALK ABOUT THAT IN A LITTLE MORE ABOUT INTO THE CONTRACT.

SO SAYING THAT, JANELLE, COULD YOU PUT UP THE SLIDES PLEASE MA'AM? YOU GO TO THE NEXT ONE, PLEASE.

THE PARTICIPANTS CURRENTLY WITH THIS MOU, AS YOU KNOW, AND CAN SEE IN THE MOU IS GALVESTON COUNTY, CITY OF GALVESTON, NAVIGATION DISTRICT, TEXAS A&M, PORT OF GALVESTON AND PORT OF HOUSTON ARE THE PARTICIPANTS, AND THEY HAVE BEEN THE PARTICIPANTS WITH THE DISCUSSIONS ON THIS MOU FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS NOW.

THAT HAS NOT CHANGED.

SO. SO WHO IS THE LEAD? EXCUSE ME? WHO IS THE LEAD? LIKE, IS THERE A LEAD PARTICIPANT? WELL, THE CITY OF GALVESTON RIGHT NOW.

RIGHT NOW, THE CITY OF GALVESTON IS IN THE LEAD TO GET THE MOU DONE, BUT THE AFA AGREEMENT WILL BE WITH THE COUNTY.

WITH THE COUNTY. THAT'S BETWEEN COUNTY AND TXDOT, CITY OF GALVESTON.

IT'S TAKEN UP THAT CHARGE, I GUESS, MAYBE NINE MONTHS AGO, AND STARTED BRINGING THIS FORWARD AFTER THE COUNTY DECIDED THAT THEY WERE GOING TO KIND OF PULL OUT OF THAT THAT ROLE. THE ADVANCE FUNDING AGREEMENT THAT WE TALKED ABOUT, IT'S A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE LOCAL SPONSOR AND THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION, AND IT OUTLINES THE OBLIGATION OF BOTH PARTIES.

THIS IS THE COUNTY AND TXDOT IS SERVING IN THAT ROLE.

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING IS AGREEMENT BETWEEN ALL THE PARTICIPANTS OUTLINING FINANCIAL COMMITMENTS, AS WELL AS THE STRUCTURE FOR THE FUNDING OF THE BRIDGE.

AND THAT'S WHAT'S BEFORE YOU TODAY.

NEXT SLIDE. PROTRACTED COST OF CONSTRUCTION IS EIGHTY FIVE MILLION.

CITY OF GALVESTON'S PARTICIPATION IS $5 MILLION THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN APPROVED BY IDC AND THE [INAUDIBLE], AND IN THE NEW MOU, AN ADDITIONAL $1 MILLION IS ALLOCATED TO THE CITY OF GALVESTON. THE COST OVERRUNS IN THIS DOCUMENT IS COVERED IN THE ADDITIONAL FUNDS SECTION IN THE LATTER PART OF THIS MOU DOCUMENT, WHICH IS ELEVEN POINT FIVE MILLION DOLLARS.

NEXT. YES, MA'AM.

I'M SORRY. GO RIGHT AHEAD.

SO THE COST OVERRUNS IN MY READING OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE GOING TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE COMPANY? THEY'RE THEIR RESPONSE TO THE COST OVERRUNS.

IF YOU'LL NOTICE IN THE MOU ON THE LAST PAGE, I THINK IT IS OF THE MOU.

IT HAS ADDITIONAL FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES.

THE PORT HAS AGREED THEY'RE GOING TO PARTICIPATE WITH $2 MILLION.

THE PORT OF GALVESTON AND THE PORT OF HOUSTON.

NOW, LET ME LET ME MAKE SURE WE'RE CLEAR ON THIS.

THE [INAUDIBLE] BOARD HAS NOT APPROVED THIS.

THIS IS SOMETHING THAT'S STILL IN A DRAFT PHASE, AND THE PORT OF HOUSTON HAS NOT TOTALLY APPROVED THIS. THIS IS STILL IN THE DRAFT PHASE, BUT TWO MILLION FROM THE PORT, TWO MILLION FROM THE PORT OF GALVESTON, PORT OF HOUSTON, TWO MILLION.

BUT WASN'T THAT LIKE PART OF MATCHING FUNDS LIKE THEY WERE PUTTING WHICH IS IN YOUR ADDITIONAL FUNDING HERE AND YOU'RE IN YOUR ADDITIONAL FUNDING IS SEVEN POINT FIVE MILLION THEY'RE PUTTING UP OF THEIR TWO MILLION EACH PORT WILL PUT UP ONE POINT TWO FIVE MILLION TO BE A MATCH, WHICH IS THE FOR THE RIDER FUNDS TO BRING IN THE EXTRA SEVEN AND A HALF MILLION DOLLARS.

AND THE CITY OF GALVESTON IS TO PUT IN AN EXTRA $1 MILLION, THE HGAC IS TO PUT IN AN EXTRA TWO MILLION AND TEXAS A&M AN EXTRA MILLION.

WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH TEXAS A&M.

THEY WILL BE MEETING WITH THEIR BOARD OF REGENTS COMING UP HERE IN THE NEXT WEEK OR TWO TO BRING FORWARD TO HOPEFULLY GET APPROVAL FROM THEIR BOARD OF REGENTS FOR THE EXTRA

[01:15:02]

MILLION DOLLARS FROM TEXAS A&M.

THAT'S THE ELEVEN POINT FIVE THAT'S AVAILABLE FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDING.

YES, SIR. BUT PART OF THAT ELEVEN POINT FIVE IS THE POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL MILLION DOLLARS FROM IDC? YES SIR. THAT'S SO THAT'S PART OF THE ELEVEN POINT FIVE.

THAT IS THAT IS CORRECT.

AND THE CURRENTLY WE HAVE $3 MILLION SET ASIDE IN IDC FUNDS.

IT IS PUT INTO OUR 20.

IT RUNS UNTIL 23, 24 AND THAT'S WHEN WE WOULD HAVE THE $5 MILLION AVAILABLE.

IF WE APPROVE THE EXTRA MILLION COMING FROM THE CITY OF GALVESTON, THEN WE WOULD EXTEND THAT IDC FUNDING TO 24, 25 ON THAT.

AND IN THIS DOCUMENT ALSO, IT OUTLINES THAT THE CITY OF GALVESTON WOULD BE THE OWNER OF THIS BRIDGE ONCE IT'S COMPLETED.

AND THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT AND TO REALLY DELVE INTO ALSO.

AND WHILE WE'RE ON THE SUBJECT OF THE OWNERSHIP OF THE BRIDGE, BRIAN, AND I THINK IF YOU BECAUSE WE'VE HAD MANY DISCUSSIONS WITH TXDOT.

I MEAN, QUITE HONESTLY, THE NAVIGATION DISTRICT, OTHER THAN JUST DAY TO DAY MINOR STUFF, IS RELIED UPON THE OFF SYSTEM BRIDGE FUND TO MAKE THE REPAIRS TO THE CURRENT BRIDGE.

AND TXDOT HAS TOLD US THAT THEY WOULD AVAIL THAT SAME FUNDING SOURCE TO THE CITY OF GALVESTON UPON OWNERSHIP SHOULD THERE BE A NEED FOR MAJOR REPAIRS DOWN THE ROAD.

IT'S A COMPETITIVE DEAL, SO THERE'S NO GUARANTEES, BUT THUS FAR IT'S WORKED FOR THE LAST 20 YEARS OF THE NAVIGATION DISTRICT'S BEEN USING IT, AND IT'S WHAT'S KEPT THE BRIDGE GOING THIS FAR. SO IN THIS BRIDGE WILL CERTAINLY BE ELIGIBLE FOR THOSE OFFICES TO BRIDGE FUNDS FOR ANY MAJOR REPAIRS.

THEY DON'T ANTICIPATE THE CITY RUNNING IN ANY MAJOR MAJOR REPAIRS WITH THIS BRIDGE.

ABSENT SOME TYPE OF DISASTER FOR THE FIRST 10 15 YEARS OF OPERATION OF THE BRIDGE.

SO.

THE BIGGEST EXPENSE THE CITY WE THINK WOULD BE LIGHTING.

YEAH, LET'S OPEN IT UP NOW.

LET ME MENTION THIS.

THIS IS NOT GOING TO BE OUR ONLY MEETING ON THIS SUBJECT.

SO WE'LL HAVE A NUMBER OF MEETINGS TO DELVE INTO OTHER AREAS OF THIS THAT THE COUNCIL WOULD LIKE TO DELVE INTO, DAVID.

MAYOR, I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR PUSHING THIS FORWARD.

I KNOW YOU'VE DONE AN ENORMOUS AMOUNT OF WORK IN THE BACKGROUND.

THIS HAS BEEN GOING FOR FOR FOR MANY YEARS AND IT NINE MONTHS AGO, IT JUST ABOUT FELL APART. YOU KNOW, AND I CONGRATULATE YOU ON GETTING EVERYBODY BACK TO THE TABLE AND MAKING MAKING THIS, MAKING THIS WORK, GETTING US TO THIS POINT.

I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT THAT WE EXPRESS OUR CONFIDENCE IN THOSE EFFORTS AND IN THE GOOD FAITH OF ALL OF THE SIGNATORIES ON HERE.

IT'S A GREAT GETTING PORT HOUSTON TO HELP US ON THIS.

GETTING A&M TO EXTEND THEIR PARTICIPATION IN THIS AS WELL.

I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT THAT WE EXPRESS OUR CONFIDENCE IN OUR PARTNERS IN THIS SIGN, THIS AND MOVE THIS FORWARD.

AS BRIAN SAYS THAT, YOU KNOW, THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE A GREAT EXPENSE TO US AT ONCE.

WE TAKE OWNERSHIP OF THE BRIDGE, BUT IT IS OUR BRIDGE.

I MEAN, IT'S OUR TERRITORIES, YOU KNOW, AND WE EITHER DO THIS OR WE START WORKING ON A FERRY TO GET PEOPLE BACK AND FORTH FROM THE CAMPUS, AND THIS SEEMS TO SUIT.

THIS SEEMS THE SIMPLE SOLUTION.

AS FOR COST OVERRUNS, THE TXDOT HAS A REAL REPUTATION FOR NOT HAVING A LOT OF COST OVERRUNS THAT IF A COMPANY SAYS THAT WE CAN BUILD IT FOR $85 MILLION, TXDOT TENDS TO HOLD THEM TO THEIR FEET TO THE FIRE AND GET IT DONE FOR EIGHTY FIVE MILLION DOLLARS.

THEY FEEL THEY FEEL LIKE THE LETTING THEY'RE LETTING YOU KNOW, WE'LL HAVE A GOOD IDEA OF WHERE IT'S LET. THEY TEND TO THERE.

THEY SPEND A LOT OF MONEY WITH CONTRACTORS.

CONTRACTORS TEND TO WORK [INAUDIBLE].

WE CAN SEE A LOT OF THAT. YEAH.

SO I'M THE ONLY THING I THINK YOU HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT TXDOT WOULD BE TIMELINES [INAUDIBLE]. YEAH, WHEN THEY FINALLY GET THAT FINAL PAYMENT LAYER MAY TAKE A LITTLE WHILE, BUT BUT YOU KNOW, LET'S GET THIS UNDERWAY.

WE CAN WE CAN. WE CAN MESS AROUND WITH THIS FOR ANOTHER THREE OR FOUR YEARS.

AND WE'LL BE BECAUSE WE, AS YOU SAID, IT'S BEEN EIGHT YEARS NOW THAT THIS HAS BEEN CONTEMPLATED SINCE COMMISSIONER [INAUDIBLE] BROUGHT IT FORWARD.

RIGHT NOW, NOW'S THE TIME TO DO IT BECAUSE BY 2030, WE HAVE TO HAVE WE HAVE TO HAVE A BRIDGE, HAVE TO HAVE A BRIDGE.

IT'S QUITE POSSIBLE. BEFORE THE NEW BRIDGE IS COMPLETE, THERE'LL BE A LOAD GRADE PLACED ON THE EXISTING BRIDGE.

EXACTLY. YEAH, EXACTLY IT.

AND I THINK ALL PARTIES, EACH PARTY, THE NAVIGATION DISTRICT, THE PORTS WILL BE ASSESSING THIS PARTICULAR MOU AND GIVING INPUT ON THIS.

WE'VE BEEN HAVING MEETINGS WITH INDIVIDUAL PARTICIPANTS, ONE ON ONE WITH THE CITY HERE TO

[01:20:06]

MAKE SURE THAT WE KIND OF GET THOSE THINGS UNDERSTOOD.

BUT WHEN YOU COME DOWN TO SIGNING THE DOCUMENT, THAT'S WHERE A LOT OF THE QUESTIONS START TO POP UP. SO WE PROBABLY WILL HAVE OTHER QUESTIONS WITH THE PARTICIPANTS.

NEEDLESS TO SAY, IF THIS MOU CHANGES IN ANY SUBSTANTIAL WAY THIS THIS COMES BACK TO COUNCIL AS THIS COUNCIL'S DECISION.

AND THERE IS A PAUSE POINT JUST A PAUSE POINT IN THE AGREEMENTS.

IN THE DOCUMENT, THERE'S A PAUSE POINT IF IT GOES OUT FOR BIDS AND IT COMES BACK FOR THOSE BIDS ARE EXCESSIVELY HIGH AND OVERRUNS ALL OF OUR ADDITIONAL FUNDS, THERE'S A PAUSE AT THAT POINT AND THAT ALLOWS ALL THE PARTIES TO COME BACK TO THE TABLE, SEE WHAT WE WANT TO DO TO POSSIBLY ADDRESS THOSE COST OVERRUNS THAT ARE ABOVE AND BEYOND WHAT WE EVEN HAVE I'VE GOT A COUPLE QUICK QUESTIONS.

YES, SIR. ON THE FIRST PAGE OF THE MOU, IT TALKS ABOUT THE CONSTRUCTION COST, AND IT LOOKS LIKE THE PROJECT IS APPROXIMATELY ONE HUNDRED FIFTEEN MILLION.

YES, SIR. AND THEN IT SAYS 20 AND THEN AND THEN 20 MILLION IN TXDOT DIRECT COST.

SO IS THE TOTAL PROJECT, ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY FIVE MILLION.

THE AND I WAS TELLING JOHN A LITTLE EARLIER YESTERDAY HE HAD MENTIONED SOME THINGS.

THERE'S STILL SOME QUIRKY THINGS IN THIS THAT WE NEED TO CLARIFY.

THE DOCUMENT IS CORRECT, BUT THE WAY IT'S WORDED, I THINK THIS WHEREAS CAME FROM TXDOT.

THE PROJECT'S EIGHTY FIVE MILLION THAT INCLUDES 10 MILLION.

THEY'VE SET ASIDE FOR THE DEMOLITION OF THE BRIDGE.

I MEAN, I SEE ALL THOSE NUMBERS THAT JUST IN THIS SENTENCE, IT'S I MEAN, IN THIS PARAGRAPH IT SAYS, YOU KNOW, CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES FOR THE PROJECT IS APPROXIMATELY 115 MILLION 105 MILLION NEEDED FOR FUNDING OF CONSTRUCTION.

AND THEN IT BREAKS IT DOWN.

THERE'S SOME CONTINGENCIES IN THERE.

AND KEEP IN MIND, THE NAVIGATION DISTRICT IS ON THE HOOK FOR THE COMPLETE DEMOLITION OF THE OLD BRIDGE, RIGHT? THAT'S RIGHT.

SO IF YOU TAKE THE EIGHTY FIVE THOUSAND AND YOU SUBTRACT IT FROM THE 105, THEN THAT MAKES THE DIFFERENTIAL THE 20 MINUTE MILLION FOR THE TXDOT DIRECT COST.

WELL, TEN MILLION AT THE 115.

IS THAT HOW YOU DO THAT MATH? WELL, THE 20 MILLION LET ME CLARIFY THIS.

THE LAST PORTION OF THAT SINCE 20 MILLION IN TXDOT DIRECT COSTS FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND OVERSIGHT. THAT'S MONIES THAT ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS PHASE, AND THAT'S MONIES THAT TXDOT IS GOING TO ASSUME WITHOUT ANY PAYBACK.

SO I MEAN, SO TOTAL COSTS HERE 135 MILLION.

IF. WELL, YEAH, IF YOU'RE INCLUDING THE DEMOLITION OF THE OTHER BRIDGE, THE DEMOS IN THERE, YEAH, YEAH. WELL, QUITE HONESTLY, THERE'S A PIECE OF THE DEMOLITION THERE, THE NAVIGATION. THE DISTRICT UNDERSTANDS THAT THAT'S PROBABLY NOT THE RIGHT . THE WAY THE DOCUMENT IS STRUCTURED.

AND LET ME SAY THIS THE NAVIGATION DISTRICT HAS NOT APPROVED THIS AS YET, EITHER.

BUT. WELL WE DID MEET WITH THEM.

WE MET WITH THEM AND TALKED WITH THEM ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT.

THE COST OF THE DEMOLITION OF THE BRIDGE IN A WAY SHOULDN'T EVEN BE INCLUDED IN THIS BECAUSE THAT'S THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE [INAUDIBLE] DISTRICT.

AND THEN AND SO IF YOU GO BACK TO THE SECOND OR LAST PAGE, PAGE 12, YOU DO HAVE THE 10 MILLION IN THERE IN THE 102 MILLION SO 100.2 MILLION IS THE TOTAL FUNDING THERE.

CORRECT. AND THEN YOU HAVE SOME ADDITIONAL FUNDING, 11.5 MILLION THAT TOTALS ONE HUNDRED AND ELEVEN POINT SEVEN MILLION.

SO THAT'S KIND OF EARMARKED WHERE THAT FUNDING IS COMING FROM.

YES, SIR. AND THE OVERRUNS 111 MILLION.

YES, SIR. SO WE'VE GOT ONE HUNDRED AND ELEVEN MILLION BASICALLY EARMARKED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THIS BRIDGE.

BUT IT SEEMS LIKE YOU GO BACK TO PAGE ONE AND PROJECT IS APPROXIMATELY ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTEEN MILLION.

CAN I TAKE A SHOT AT THAT.

PLEASE. YES. WELL, THE PROJECT COST IS ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTEEN MILLION DOLLARS.

ONE HUNDRED AND FIVE, OF THAT IS TO BUILD THE BRIDGE.

AND 10 MILLION OF THAT IS FROM THE NAVIGATION DISTRICT TO TEAR DOWN THE OLD ONE.

[01:25:05]

AND THAT'S HOW YOU GET TO THE HUNDRED AND FIVE.

BUT THEN THERE'S THE BECAUSE THE TWENTY MILLION FOR DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BRIDGE IS NOT IN THAT 115, THAT'S ONLY $10 MILLION DOLLARS IN THERE.

SO THAT IS POORLY WORDED.

I THINK THE EXTRA 20 MILLION IS THE DIRECT COST THAT WE DON'T SHARE IN WITH TXDOT.

SO I THINK THERE'S A DISPARITY HERE THAT YOU SAY NAVIGATION DISTRICT IS PUTTING IN TEN, IT'S GOING TO COST 20 MILLION.

THEY'RE ALLOCATING OR ESTIMATED 20 MILLION TO TAKE IT DOWN.

WHERE'S THE MISSING $10 MILLION DOLLARS? AND I THINK THAT'S JUST NAVIGATION DISTRICTS PROBLEM REAL CLEAR. NO IT'S NOT.

UP, OK, BEFORE IT GETS BACK TO COUNCIL, WE'LL MAKE SURE THAT'S CLEARED UP.

OK? AND THEN MY, YOU KNOW, MY ONLY OTHER CONCERN, I MEAN, I'M ALL FOR THIS.

MY ONLY OTHER CONCERN IS, OF COURSE, WITH THE CITY OF GALVESTON BEING THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SPONSOR. WE'RE NOT THE SPONSOR.

THE COUNTY CONSTRUCTION.

ONCE COMPLETE, THE CITY OF GALVESTON IS A LOCAL GOVERNMENT SPONSOR FOR A FUTURE OFFSETS AND MAINTENANCE REHAB, THAT'S CORRECT. SO WE ARE LEFT HOLDING THE BAG AT THE END OF THE DAY, BUT YOU FEEL COMFORTABLE THAT PREVIOUS HISTORY SHOWS THAT TXDOT WILL BE THERE TO STEP IN.

IT'S A STICKY SITUATION.

TXDOT WILL NOT. WE'VE TRIED EVERYTHING.

THEY WILL NOT TAKE THE BRIDGE ON SYSTEM AND THE COUNTY WON'T TAKE IT.

THE NAVIGATION DISTRICT HAS SAID THEY'RE NOT IN THE BRIDGE BUSINESS ANYMORE, SO THAT LEAVES US IF WE WANT TO.

I MEAN, THAT'S OUR IN OUR DISTRICT I MEAN IT'S IN OUR JURISDICTION.

WE'VE GOT A LOT OF TAX BASE OVER THERE.

WE'VE GOT A LOT OF DEVELOPMENT OVER THERE.

WE GOT A LOT OF KIDS OVER THERE AT A&M.

WE GOT A LOT OF JOBS OVER THERE.

I THINK ULTIMATELY IT NEEDS TO REST WITH US 30 YEARS FROM NOW.

IS IT GOING TO BE SOMETHING THAT COULD COME UP? QUITE POSSIBLY, BUT WE'LL GET IT ON A MAINTENANCE PROGRAM AND WE'LL HOPE THAT TXDOT WILL CONTINUE TO BE GENEROUS THROUGH THEIR [INAUDIBLE] SYSTEM BRIDGE FUNDS.

AND IT ALSO IT'S IMPERATIVE THROUGHOUT ALL THIS THAT WE KEEP ACTIVE REPRESENTATION AT HGAC. YEAH, AND THAT'S SO IMPORTANT.

I SERVED ON THEIR BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

KEN CLARK IS CURRENTLY THE CHAIRMAN OF THEIR TEXAS TRANSPORTATION POLICY COUNCIL.

DAVID SERVES, AS YOUR REPRESENTATIVE, THAT HAS BEEN ATTENDING REGULARLY.

I'VE BEEN ATTENDING REGULARLY ON THE MEETINGS.

WE HAVE NOT BEEN DOING THAT IN THE PAST TO BE VERY CANDID.

BEEN. I WENT TO EVERY MEETING PRIOR TO THAT.

BUT WE'RE BACK IN.

WE'RE GOT A CONSTANT PIPELINE AND RAPPORT WITH HGAC.

AND I WANT TO SAY ONE OTHER THING ABOUT THIS BRIDGE, THIS BRIDGE IT IS A GALVESTON, REALLY A GALVESTON STRUCTURE, AND IT WILL OPEN THE DOOR IMMENSELY FOR OUR CONVERSATIONS WITH THE PORT OF HOUSTON.

AND THAT WILL BE OUR NEXT STEP TO OPEN UP SERIOUS DISCUSSIONS WITH THE PORT OF HOUSTON ON THE USE OF THAT LAND OVER THERE IN PELICAN ISLAND.

NOW WHAT FORM THAT WILL TAKE? WE'VE HAD SOME PRELIMINARY DISCUSSIONS THINKING HOW THAT COULD COME ABOUT.

IT COULD BE A PARTNERSHIP WITH PORT OF HOUSTON, COULD BE A LEASE ARRANGEMENT, COULD BE AN OUTRIGHT BUYING OF THE LAND AT THE PORT OF HOUSTON THAT THEY OWN OVER THERE.

SO BUT THIS BRIDGE IS THE INTEGRAL PART OF THAT DISCUSSION OF HOW WE'RE GOING TO DEVELOP PELICAN ISLAND. AND OUR OWN HUNDRED ACRES OVER THERE BECAUSE NOBODY'S GOING TO INVEST A LOT OF MONEY IN THERE IF THERE'S THE THREAT OF A LOAD RATED BRIDGE IN THE FUTURE.

CORRECT. YES, SIR.

WHAT WILL BE THE ROLE OF THE NAVIGATION DISTRICT ONCE THE OLD BRIDGE GETS DEMOLISHED? CAN I TAKE THAT ONE. LET ME LET ME INTERFACE ON THAT.

WE'VE DISCUSSED THAT WITH THE NAVIGATION DISTRICT.

THEY HAVE NOT MADE A DECISION ON THAT.

THERE WAS SOME COMMENTS MADE THAT THE NAVIGATION DISTRICT MAY TURN THEIR ATTENTION ONCE THEIR FUNDING OF THIS IS TAKEN CARE OF AND THE BRIDGE IS TORN DOWN.

THAT THEY WOULD TURN THEIR ATTENTION TO THE PORT AND THAT THEY WOULD BE A FUNDING MECHANISM FOR ACTIVITIES AT THE PORT SUCH AS DREDGING AND SO FORTH, WHICH IS THE WAY MANY NAVIGATION DISTRICTS HAVE THEIR SET UP ON THAT.

SO THAT TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION NOW, THAT WAS WHERE WE WERE KIND OF THINKING.

BUT KEEP IN MIND, THE DEMOLITION ESTIMATE IS THE WILDCARD IN THIS, AND THAT'S WHAT TXDOT WILL TELL US IS THAT THEY'RE VERY GOOD ABOUT TELLING YOU WHAT IT'S GOING TO COST TO BUILD THE BRIDGE, TEARING DOWN THAT BRIDGE AND THE CASINGS AND EVERYTHING UNDERNEATH IT THEY

[01:30:03]

DON'T KNOW.

AND THE NAVIGATION DISTRICT UNDERSTANDS THAT.

SO THERE WILL MOST LIKELY BE DEBT ISSUED BY THE NAVIGATION DISTRICT AT SOME POINT IN THIS PROCESS TO PAY FOR THE DEMOLITION OF THAT BRIDGE.

SO THERE'S GOING TO BE A PERIOD OF TIME THAT THE NAVIGATION DISTRICT IS NOT OPERATING A BRIDGE, BUT THAT IT'S PAYING DEBT FOR THE DEMOLITION OF THAT BRIDGE.

AND I WOULD BET IT CONSUMES MOST OF THEIR CURRENT TAX RATES FOR SOME PERIOD OF TIME.

IS THAT 10 YEARS? IS THAT DEBT? IS THE TEN MILLION DOLLARS, IS THAT DEBT? OR DO THEY HAVE THAT THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE THE TEN MILLION DOLLARS AT SOME POINT.

THEY'RE LIKE US, THEY'RE BUILDING IT UP.

THEY CURRENTLY, JOHN, THEY HAVE CURRENTLY AND I.

IF THE NAVIGATION DISTRICTS WATCHING, I APOLOGIZE IF I DON'T GET THIS CORRECT, BUT THEY CURRENTLY HAVE FOUR OR FIVE MILLION DOLLARS HAVE BEEN SET ASIDE.

CORRECT. THEY'VE BEEN PUTTING ASIDE SINCE THIS ALL STARTED.

OK, ONCE AND THEN DEPENDING, THEY'RE SHOOTING FOR 10 MILLION NOW.

IF IT'S OVER THE $10 MILLION DOLLARS WE TALKED WITH TXDOT AND HELPED TO BROKER AN ARRANGEMENT WHERE TXDOT WOULD WORK WITH THE NAVIGATION DISTRICT IF THEY ELECTED TO MOVE IN THIS DIRECTION TO SET UP A LOAN.

A STATE LOAN THAT WOULD BE PAID BACK OVER A LONG PERIOD OF TIME THIS IS POSSIBLY AT A VERY LOW INTEREST RATE, AND THAT WOULD BE WHERE THE FUNDS OF THE NAVIGATION DISTRICT WOULD CONTINUE TO GO INTO THAT.

AS WE CAN IMAGINE, THEY'RE OPERATING THE BRIDGE NOW, AND I'M THINKING THEY'RE SETTING ASIDE SOMEWHERE AROUND SEVEN EIGHT HUNDRED THOUSAND A YEAR FOR THIS BRIDGE.

ONCE THAT BRIDGE IS NO LONGER IN OPERATION, THEY'LL BE SETTING ASIDE OVER A MILLION DOLLARS EACH YEAR OVER FOR THAT BRIDGE.

OKAY. AND JUST REMEMBER, WE DON'T OWN THE CURRENT BRIDGE.

THAT'S TOTALLY THEIR RESPONSIBILITY TO REMOVE THAT BRIDGE, AND IT HAS TO BE REMOVED.

SO THE NAVIGATION, THEY'RE VERY GOOD ABOUT IT.

THEY UNDERSTAND ALL THAT. SO I ALWAYS THOUGHT JUST I'D THROW THIS WILD IDEA OUT THERE SINCE WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT THIS FOR 20 YEARS, I MEAN, FOR THE LONGEST TIME, IF WE COULD TURN IT INTO A WIN WIN AND DO A CONTRACT WITH A MOVIE PRODUCTION COMPANY.

AND WE COULD ACTUALLY MAKE IT.

HE'S GOT A FACILITY RIGHT NEXT TO IT.

I KNOW BUT IN A VERY CONTROLLED SITUATION.

I'M JUST SAYING IT COULD BE A WIN-WIN SOLUTION.

THE NAVIGATION DISTRICT, THE DEMOLITION OF THAT BRIDGE AND ALL THE THINGS THAT ARE INVOLVED. WE'RE NOT A PART OF THAT AN THIS MOU, IS NOT A PART OTHER THAN MENTIONING IT IN THE FUNDING. YOU KNOW THAT THEY'RE INVOLVED WITH TXDOT THE COAST GUARD.

A LOT OF OTHER ENTITIES THAT ARE INVOLVED THERE.

SOMEBODY TOLD ME THEY MAY REMOVE HALF OF IT AND LEAVE PART OF IT AS A FISHING PIER.

YOU KNOW, WELL, SOUTH PADRE WAS EXTREMELY SUCCESSFUL WITH THAT WITH THEIR CAUSEWAY.

I MEAN, THEY ENDED UP KEEPING JUST A PART OF THE CAUSEWAY.

THEY SOLD IT.

THERE'S A RESTAURANT OUT THERE.

IT'S A BEAUTIFUL EXPERIENCE.

I MEAN, THERE COULD BE SOMETHING THAT COULD BE DONE WITH THAT.

POSSIBLY, COULD.

THIS IS NOT OUR DECISION, BUT SOME OF THE INPUT I'M GETTING IS THAT TO SAVE PART OF THE BRIDGE AND THEN TO MANAGE THE LIABILITY OF THAT AS YOU MOVE FORWARD IS SOMETIMES MORE INVOLVED THAN JUST TAKING THE BRIDGE DOWN.

[INAUDIBLE] SO WANT TO MENTION ONE THING TOO YOU MAY HAVE HEARD RUMORS ABOUT THIS.

THERE WAS TALK THIS BRIDGE IS SEVENTY FOUR FOOT TALL.

THERE WAS TALK ABOUT LOWERING THE BRIDGE AND REDUCING THE COST OF THIS BRIDGE.

WE HAVE NUMEROUS MEETINGS WITH TXDOT AND WITH THE COAST GUARD ON THIS.

AND AFTER IT ALL CAME TO PASS, LOWERING THE BRIDGE DOWN QUITE A BIT REALLY DIDN'T REDUCE THE COST THAT MUCH.

THESE NUMBERS ARE DESIGNED TO SUPPORT A SEVENTY FOUR FOOT BRIDGE.

THERE ARE OTHER ENTITIES, BY THE WAY, THAT ARE TO THE WEST OF WHERE THIS BRIDGE WILL BE.

THOSE ENTITIES HAVE BEEN IN TOUCH WITH US.

THESE ARE COMMERCIAL ENTITIES AND PRIVATE ENTITIES THAT WANT TO MAKE SURE THIS STAYS A SEVENTY FOUR FOOT BRIDGE FOR TRAFFIC FLOW AND SO FORTH.

SO TXDOT HAS TAKEN THAT INTO CONSIDERATION.

AND AT THIS POINT, AND I THINK IT WILL STAY, THIS WILL BE A 74 FOOT BRIDGE.

THAT WAS EXACTLY MY QUESTION THAT IT STAY AT SEVENTY FOUR BECAUSE OF WHAT'S HAPPENING NOW IS A LOT OF TRAFFIC, HAS TO GO ALL THE WAY AROUND PELICAN ISLAND.

AND THEY WERE COUNTING THE VESSELS THAT WENT THROUGH, BUT THEY WEREN'T COUNTING THE VESSELS THAT COULDN'T GO THROUGH BECAUSE OF THE ISSUE.

[01:35:03]

SO I'M HAPPY TO HEAR THAT.

I THINK THAT'S A VERY WISE DECISION.

WE TOOK BUT WE DON'T HAVE THE FINAL SAY, BUT WE TOOK THAT IN CONSIDERATION FROM THESE ENTITIES TO THE WEST OF THAT AREA AND AND TXDOT DID TOO.

SO IT AND IT WAS A VERY SMALL DIFFERENCE.

WE LOWERED IT FROM 74 TO 45 FEET.

STUNNING HOW LITTLE YOU SAVE, BUT SO MUCH OF THE COST OF THE BRIDGE IS NOT THE ARCH, IT'S THE RUN UP TO IT. THAT'S EXACTLY RIGHT.

THAT'S EXACTLY RIGHT. THE REAL SAVINGS WOULD COME IF YOU JUST MADE IT.

YEAH, LET'S NOT DO THAT.

YOU KNOW, THERE WILL BE SOME CHANGES TO THIS MOU WE MET YESTERDAY.

TEXAS A&M HAS REQUESTED SOME CHANGES TO SATISFY SOME OF THEIR NEEDS FOR THE BOARD OF REGENTS. OUR CITY ATTORNEY, DON, HAS BEEN IN TOUCH WITH THEIR ATTORNEYS AND IS WORKING ON THAT, AND I THINK WE'RE COMING CLOSE TO GETTING THAT WORKED OUT HERE AND WE'LL HAVE SOME OTHER CHANGES WITH TEXAS A&M'S INPUT.

I THINK COMING UP IN A FUTURE DOCUMENT THAT WILL BE BROUGHT BACK TO YOU.

ANY QUESTIONS ON THE BRIDGE? GOOD JOB ON THIS APPRECIATE IT AND THANK YOU TO STAN RYAN.

APPRECIATE [INAUDIBLE].

LET'S MOVE TO ITEM 3D, PLEASE.

[3.D. Discussion Of Stewart Beach Park And Resolution For Joint Committee (Brown/Collins - 30 Min)]

3D DISCUSSION OF STEWART BEACH PARK AND RESOLUTION FOR JOINT COMMITTEE.

WELL, WE MOVE FROM ONE SUBJECT THAT GETS INVOLVED TO ANOTHER AND BEFORE YOU ON OUR AGENDA THIS AFTERNOON, THERE WILL BE THE POSSIBLE CONSIDERATION OF APPROVING A RESOLUTION TO FORM A JOINT COMMITTEE.

I KNOW AT YOUR LAST MEETING THIS WAS DISCUSSED AT LENGTH AND THIS PARTICULAR COMMITTEE.

IT'S OUTLINED IN THE RESOLUTION HOW THAT WOULD BE SET UP.

IT GIVES A CHARGE TO THE COMMITTEE.

IT OUTLINES THE COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE.

IT EVEN OUTLINES MENTIONING ABOUT THE ELECTION OF THE CHAIRPERSON OF THE COMMITTEE IN THE RESOLUTION.

AND THIS WOULD SET UP A COMMITTEE THAT WOULD BRING BACK IN THREE MONTHS.

IT WOULD BRING BACK THOSE OPTIONS THAT THIS COMMITTEE DETERMINED FOR STEWART BEACH PARK.

I HAVE ALWAYS FELT THAT WE STARTED TALKING ABOUT WHAT WE WANT TO DO WITH THE IMPROVEMENTS OF STEWART BEACH BACK IN 2014, 2015 AND PROBABLY EVEN BEFORE THEN.

AND COUNCIL HAD GIVEN DIRECTION AT TIMES.

BUT I'M GOING TO BE VERY CANDID.

I DON'T THINK WE EVER GAVE AS CLEAR DIRECTION TO THE PARK BOARD AND REALLY INVOLVED OURSELVES IN REALLY MAKING SURE THAT WE STAY FOCUSED ON IMPROVEMENTS AT STEWART BEACH AS WE SHOULD HAVE. PARK BOARD HAS DONE A EXCEPTIONAL JOB IN MY MIND AND MOVING AHEAD AND WHAT THEY FELT WAS THEIR DIRECTION FROM COUNCILMAN AND PARK BOARD, I WANT TO THANK THEM.

THEY HAVE PUT OUT A LOT OF EFFORT KELLY AND ALL THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEMBERS OVER THE YEARS TO TRY TO MOVE FORWARD IMPROVEMENTS AT STEWART BEACH PARK.

THIS COMMITTEE WOULD NOT ONLY IN MY MIND, BRING BACK THE POSSIBILITY OF PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS IF THE COMMITTEE FELT THAT THAT WAS AN APPROPRIATE OPTION FOR COUNCIL, BUT THEY WOULD BRING BACK ALL OF OUR OPTIONS.

MANY TIMES I'VE ASKED INDIVIDUALS, YOU KNOW, THIS PARTICULAR APPROACH DOES NOT WORK FOR STEWART BEACH PARK.

WHAT ARE OUR ALTERNATIVES? AND THE RESPONSE IS, WELL, WE'RE NOT REAL SURE.

THIS COMMITTEE IS DESIGNED AND CHARGED WITH BRINGING BACK THOSE OPTIONS TO COUNCIL, MAKING COUNCIL AWARE OF THOSE GETTING COUNCIL'S INPUT.

EVALUATION OF THOSE AND THEN PICKING THAT ONE OR THOSE MULTIPLE OPTIONS THAT COUNCIL FEELS MAY BE APPROPRIATE FOR STEWART BEACH PARK AND ALLOWING THEN THIS COMMITTEE TO COME BACK WITH SPECIFIC DETAILS FROM FUNDING AND HOW THAT WOULD BE APPROACHED AND THINGS LIKE THAT. SO EXCUSE ME FOR JUST A SECOND, SO THIS PARTICULAR COMMITTEE.

AND I WANT TO I WANT TO EMPHASIZE THIS IN MY MIND, IF THIS RESOLUTION IS APPROVED BY

[01:40:06]

COUNCIL, THIS COMMITTEE WOULD LOOK AT ALL OF OUR OPTIONS, NOT BE JUST CONCENTRATING ON ONE APPROACH, BUT WOULD LOOK AT ALL OF OUR OPTIONS AND BRING THOSE BACK.

AND THAT WOULD INCLUDE THE PAVILION.

THAT WOULD INCLUDE WHAT THE MOBILE AMENITIES ARE BEING ALSO PURSUED AS WE SPEAK AT THE PARK BOARD. TO PUT IT THERE, HOW THIS WOULD ALL COME TOGETHER WITH A FUTURE PLAN FOR OUR PARK. THIS IS AN ICONIC PART FOR GALVESTON.

IT'S OUR PREMIER FAMILY PARK ON THE BEACH AND IT'S TIME NOW.

AND THIS COUNCIL, I KNOW, IS READY TO GIVE GUIDANCE FOR THIS AND LET'S MOVE THIS FORWARD.

AND I THINK THIS RESOLUTION IS OUR FIRST STEP THAT WAY.

MARIE.

WELL, I'M JUST GOING TO HAVE TO GO ALONG WITH WHAT YOU WERE SAYING.

I FEEL VERY STRONGLY THAT THIS SHOULD BE A CITY COMMITTEE.

I AGREE WITH YOU ON THAT.

I ALSO THINK THAT WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO HAVE MORE THAN TWO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS.

I WOULD LIKE TO SERVE ON THIS COMMITTEE, BUT IF I AM NOT CHOSEN TO SERVE ON THAT COMMITTEE, I PLAN ON ATTENDING EVERY MEETING.

SO IT WOULD, YOU KNOW, HAVE TO BE POSTED THAT THERE IS POTENTIAL FOR A QUORUM AT THE MEETINGS. I THINK THIS IS PERHAPS ONE OF THE BEST ASSETS WE HAVE.

IT COULD BE SOMETHING THAT COULD BE AN ANCHOR FOR THE EAST END, AND I THINK WE HAVE TO THINK MOST NUMBER ONE ABOUT OUR CITIZENS AND REALLY LOOK AT WHAT COULD BE DONE OUT THERE BECAUSE I AM NOT IN SUPPORT OF A HOTEL ON THAT PROPERTY.

GOOD TO KNOW.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? DISCUSSION ITEMS? THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

APPRECIATE IT. LET'S MOVE.

WE ARE NOW MOVING TO ITEM 3F, I THINK JANELLE.

[3.F. Discussion Of The Use Of Buccaneer And Rotary Fields By West Isle Little League (Quiroga/Robb - 10 Min)]

OK 3F DISCUSSION OF THE USE OF BUCCANEER AND ROTARY FIELDS BY WEST ISLE LITTLE LEAGUE.

THIS WAS PUT ON BY COUNCILMAN QUIROGA AND SECONDED BY COUNCILWOMAN ROBB.

AND THIS HAS BEEN A LOT. I THINK ALL OF US HAVE RECEIVED INFORMATION ON THIS AS WE SPEAK.

OUR DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION COME ON IN AND HAVE A SEAT.

BARBARA SANDERSON IS HERE.

THANK COUNCIL MEMBER ROBB.

DAYS AGO.

YES, WE DID. AND I THINK WE CAME TO AN UNDERSTANDING THAT EVERYONE, IF THERE'S ROOM, WE'LL PLAY AT 53RD STREET, IF THERE'S NOT ROOM, THEN WE WOULD MOVE SOME T-BALL GAMES AND POSSIBLY SOME MACHINE PITCH GAMES TO WEST ISLE.

SINCE THE LIGHTING SYSTEM IS NOT WORKING.

AND IT SEEMED LIKE MR. LANG AND MR. SPENCE AGREED AND THE PARTIES TO BE AT ISLE LITTLE LEAGUE AGREED, AND I FELT LIKE IT WAS A VERY PRODUCTIVE MEETING.

IT WAS AN EXTREMELY PRODUCTIVE MEETING AND AS IN MANY TOPICS THAT HAVE TO DO WITH OUR CHILDREN, WHO SHOULD ALWAYS COME FIRST.

THERE ARE A LOT OF FEELINGS ON WHAT SHOULD HAPPEN, BUT THE FIRST THING I WOULD LIKE TO DO BECAUSE THERE HAS BEEN A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF RUMORS FLYING AROUND ON THIS IS AND YOU CAN CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG.

IT WAS NEVER THE CITY'S INTENTION TO DEMOLISH THE FIELDS THAT ARE LOCATED SPEAKERS] THAT IS CORRECT.

AND SO FIRST AND FOREMOST, EVERYONE NEEDS TO KNOW THAT.

ABSOLUTELY. I KNOW A LOT OF PEOPLE FEEL LIKE THE TEAM SHOULD MERGE AND SOME PEOPLE FEEL LIKE THEY SHOULDN'T.

BUT THE CITY HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THAT.

IT'S SIMPLY THE BOARDS OF BOTH LEAGUES.

THAT'S THEIR DECISION.

THEY'RE BOTH WEIGHING ALL SIDES AND NO DECISION HAS BEEN MADE.

LOOKING AT THE OPPORTUNITIES OF WHAT WILL ALL THE KIDS BE PLAYING AT THE 53RD STREET COMPLEX OR NOT WILL NOT BE MADE AND WE WILL BE HAVING A SECOND MEETING FOLLOWING THIS FEBRUARY 17TH UNTIL FEBRUARY THE 17TH IS WHEN THEY CLOSE REGISTRATION.

CURRENTLY COMBINED, I THINK THEY HAVE LIKE 215.

[01:45:02]

BUT WHAT TENDS TO HAPPEN AND SO MANY THINGS IN OUR WORLD IS THEY SEE THEIR BIGGEST REGISTRATION ON THE FIRST TRY OUT DAY.

SO THAT'S WHY WE'RE WAITING UNTIL THAT POINT, BECAUSE TO MAKE SURE THERE IS ENOUGH ROOM ON 53RD STREET.

THE WEST ISLE FOLKS ARE PLANNING ON DOING SOME IMPROVEMENTS TO THE FIELDS THAT ARE OUT THERE AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE, BUT THEY ARE VERY OPEN TO LOOKING AT PLAYING ON 53RD.

AND I THINK PART OF WHAT HELPED MAKE EVERYTHING SO MUCH SMOOTHER IS IT USED TO BE WHO PLAYED ON WHAT LEAGUE WAS DRIVEN BY ADDRESS AND NOW IT'S DRIVEN BY EITHER YOUR ADDRESS OR WHERE YOU GO TO SCHOOL.

SO I THINK CURRENTLY EVERYONE IS ON THE SAME PAGE AND WE WILL BE GIVING AN UPDATE ON THIS AND WHAT IS FINALIZED AT OUR NEXT MEETING.

SO THAT WILL BE AGENDA ITEM.

AND BOTH LEAGUES ARE TOTALLY COMFORTABLE WITH HOW EVERYTHING IS BEING HANDLED.

AND THEN AGAIN, JUST BECAUSE OF ALL THE RUMORS, NEVER DID THE CITY HAVE ANY INTENTION OF DEMOLISHING THOSE FIELDS.

WE NEED MORE.

ACTUALLY WE NEED MORE PRACTICE AREAS, MACHINE PITCH AND PRACTICING WILL BE DONE ON THE WEST END FIELD.

AND THEN THERE WERE SOME CONCERNS AT THE 53RD STREET FIELD ON PARKING, AND DON HAS ABOUT FINALIZED AGREEMENTS WITH MOODY [INAUDIBLE] I THINK IT'S WERE IN A VERY FINAL SAY.

THERE WERE CONCERNS ABOUT A BRICK WALL, WHICH WE'RE GOING TO PROVIDE.

MAYBE A SEPARATE AREA.

MUCH EASIER FOR US TO DO AND FOCUS ON THE ONE SET OF FIELDS.

EXACTLY. SO THAT'S EVERYTHING.

AND MY THANKS TO BARBARA.

SHE'S THE ONE.

SHE'S THE ONE THAT SPEARHEADED THIS.

SHE'S REALLY LOOKING OUT FOR THE BEST INTEREST OF ALL OF OUR KIDS AND ALL OF OUR PARKS AND ALL OF OUR YOUTH ACTIVITIES.

AND SHE DID.

BARBARA IS REALLY WATCHING THE DOLLARS FOR THE WHOLE DEPARTMENT FOR US, AND I APPRECIATE HER BRINGING IT UP AND PUTTING TOGETHER A PLAN, HER AND HER STAFF, AND THEY'VE DONE A GOOD JOB WITH IT. I THANK THEM.

YES, DAVID. YEAH. BARBARA A COUPLE OF QUICK QUESTIONS.

YES SIR. ONE WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE TO MAINTAIN THE GROUNDS AT SO WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE TO MOW AND WE GOING YES, SIR. IS THAT GOING TO EXTEND TO THE FIELD AT LINDALE PARK YES SIR. SO WE WILL BE HAVING THAT ONE OUT.

WE WERE WAITING CLOSER TO SEASON.

YOU KNOW, THAT'S A HUGE MAINTENANCE, CUTTING OUT THE FIELD AND REPLENISHING IT.

I UNDERSTAND. BUT NOW THAT ONE WILL BE UP TO PAR ALSO.

BECAUSE BEFORE CROCKETT OPENED, WE STILL ONLY HAD THREE FIELDS IN THE CITY.

THAT'S CORRECT. I MEAN, SO, SO CROCKETT HAS GIVEN US THREE VERY NICE FIELDS TO PLAY ON.

ABSOLUTELY. WE STILL HAVE THE THREE OLD FIELDS THAT WE CAN USE FOR PRACTICE, BUT THE COST OF MAINTAINING THOSE, I MEAN, IT'S BECOME PROHIBITIVE.

AND BECAUSE ONE OF MY CONCERNS FROM THE VERY BEGINNING ABOUT CROCKETT WAS THAT THERE WERE NO LASSIE LEAGUE FIELDS.

THAT'S A BOYS ONLY FIELD.

AND ARE WE NOT? WELL, WE HAVE SCRAPED THE MOUNDS OFF AND GIRLS SOFTBALL TOURNAMENTS UP THERE.

THE GIRLS, SOFTBALL THEY ARE VERY AGGRESSIVE IN GETTING HAVE A NATIONAL SOFTBALL TOURNAMENT COMING IN JULY THAT'S GOING TO BE ABLE TO PLAY AT CROCKETT.

SIX FIELDS.

THE COLLEGE ARE GOING TO PLAY TOGETHER ON THE GISD GIRLS SOFTBALL FIELD, SHORT TERM AND LONG TERM. WE ARE TALKING ABOUT A THREE WAY PARTNERSHIP TO DEVELOP A MULTIPURPOSE FIELD, OR HOOPER WILL ACTUALLY BECOME A MULTIPURPOSE FIELD FOR US AND THEY WE WILL DEVELOP ANOTHER FIELD ON THE FEMA TRAILER PARK.

THE OLD SOCCER FIELDS SHELTON AND DR. GIBSON AS WELL BECAUSE THEY'VE BEEN VERY, VERY GOOD PLAYERS SPEAKERS]. WE MET WITH THEM, MONDAY, AND WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE TO MEET ON THAT.

AND KNOW THEY'RE ALL PARTNERS AND THEY ALL RECOGNIZE THE FACT THAT WE HAVE LIMITED SPACE AND LIMITED RESOURCES.

AND THE MORE WE CAN POOL AND FOCUS, THE BETTER IT IS.

AND THEY ALSO RECOGNIZE THE FACT THAT IF YOU GET THESE KIDS YOUNG AND GET THEM PLAYING ON YOUR HIGH SCHOOL FIELDS AND ON YOUR COLLEGE FIELDS, IT KEEPS THEM IN THE SYSTEM.

[01:50:03]

YES. IN OTHER WORDS GIRLS OUT OF THIS. NO NO. I KNOW WE HAVE A LOT OF GIRLS PLAYING BALL.

WE'RE GOING TO PUT FORTH SOME FUNDING TO HELP MATCH THAT.

AND THAT'S WHY WE'RE ALSO PARTICIPATING IN THAT OTHER FIELD FOR THEM, BECAUSE THEY'LL BE ABLE TO SHARE IT WITH THE COLLEGE.

LASSIE LEAGUE IS USED A WHOLE LOT MORE THAN ANY FIELD AROUND.

YEAH, THEY HAVE HIGHEST UTILIZATION THERE.

YEAH. AND LASSIE LEAGUE, HAS BEEN EXTREMELY SUCCESSFUL.

AND THEY'VE BEEN VERY PATIENT.

YES.

WE ARE GOING TO PUT FORTH AND STRAIGHTEN OUT THE YES.

MATTER OF FACT BARBARA WILL BE TALKING TO YOU AT THE IDC ABOUT THAT FIELD WILL BECOME A THREE HUNDRED FOOT FIELD SO YOU CAN PLAY BASEBALL ADULT SOFTBALL.

WE HAVE A HUGE GROUP OF ADULT SOFTBALL PLAYERS OUT THERE.

[INAUDIBLE] SPEAKERS]. AND THEY'VE EVEN BEEN VERY PATIENT BECAUSE WE'VE HAD TO LITERALLY GLUE BACK THEIR LIGHTS.

SO BE READY.

THE LIGHTING THAT'S PART OF WHAT'S DRIVING ALL THIS IS BARBARA'S IS TRYING TO COBBLE TOGETHER THIS AND WE CAN'T KEEP DOING IT IF WE KEEP WE WANT TO MOVE TO THE MUSCO SYSTEM THAT YOU DON'T TOUCH THE BALL FOR 25 YEARS.

THAT'S HOW LONG THE CONTRACT IS, THE WARRANTY.

THAT'S HELD UP PRETTY WELL ON YES, SIR. SO 53RD STREET WILL BE USED FOR ALL THE GAMES FOR BOTH LEAGUES SPEAKERS]. AS LONG AS THERE'S ROOM FOR EVERYONE.

AND WITH THE INTENT THAT A POSSIBLE T-BALL AND SOME MACHINE, POSSIBLY MACHINE PITCH TEAMS . THE GENTLEMAN DID SAY THE OTHER DAY IF EVERYTHING WOULD FIT ON 53RD, THEY WERE GOOD WITH IT. OK. AND DID YOU SAY YOU'RE SCRAPING THE MOUNDS AT THE 53RD STREET FIELDS.

WHEN SOFTBALL PLAYS.

WHEN SOFTBALL PLAYS OK. AND THEN THE CITY WILL NOT BE DOING ANYTHING WITH THE LIGHTING AT WEST ISLE.

NO, NOT AT THIS TIME.

[INAUDIBLE]. DAY GAMES.

YES.

HAPPEN THAT WEEKEND BEFORE THE SEASON STARTS.

AND THEY WERE COMFORTABLE WITH THAT.

YEAH, IT'S A LITTLE ALL RIGHT. GOOD JOB BARBARA. VERY GOOD, BRIAN I WANTED TO THANK STAFF.

I KNOW YOU WORKED DILIGENTLY ON THIS, EVEN [INAUDIBLE] ON SOME OF THOSE MEETINGS.

MARIE, THANK YOU.

YOU DID A YEOMAN'S JOB OUT THERE IN YOUR DISTRICT BARBARA I WANTED TO THANK YOU SO MUCH.

AND DANIEL I'M WELL, I'M SORRY. [LAUGHTER] BUT BARBA DID SUCH A GOOD JOB WITH THIS, AND IT WAS DIFFICULT FOR BARBARA, IF I COULD SAY BARBARA.

AND SOMETIMES IT WAS A HELP AND A HINDRANCE.

YOU WERE TALKING WITH A LOT OF PEOPLE WHO WERE VERY CLOSE PERSONAL FRIENDS, VERY CLOSE PERSONAL FRIENDS. BOTH MY SONS PLAYED AT WEST ISLE LITTLE LEAGUE.

SO THAT'S.

THAT WAS YOU REALLY BROUGHT THINGS TOGETHER.

BUT MY BROTHER PLAYED AT COLOMBO BALLPARK.

SO THE OLD COLOMBO.

SO YES, I HAVE TIES WITH BASEBALL.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

VERY MUCH SO ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU BARBARA. GOOD JOB BARBARA.

ALL RIGHT. LET'S MOVE TO ITEM 3H PLEASE.

[3.H. Discussion Of The USS Texas’ Move To Galveston As Its Home Port (Quiroga/Robb - 20 Min)]

3H DISCUSSION OF THE USS TEXAS’ MOVE TO GALVESTON AS ITS HOME PORT.

COUNCILMAN LISTOWSKI AND I MET YESTERDAY WITH THE FOUNDATION THAT REPRESENTS THE USS TEXAS. I'M GOING TO TURN IT OVER TO COUNCILMAN LISTOWSKI FOR ANY UPDATE HE HAS.

WELL, YOU KNOW, IT'S NOT MY AGENDA ITEM, BUT I'LL JUST BE BRIEF ABOUT THIS AND GIVE YOU KIND OF AN UPDATE ON WHERE WE STAND HERE.

THE MAYOR AND I MET WITH TWO REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE FOUNDATION, AND I THINK THEY HAVE A PATH TO TRY TO GET THE SHIP DOWN HERE.

I THINK THEY WANT THE SHIP HERE IN GALVESTON.

THAT PATH IS THROUGH THE WHARFS BOARD.

THEY'VE HAVE TWO OPTIONS THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO GO.

THEY'D LIKE TO PUT A SHIP ON THE PORT.

AND SO THEY'RE GOING TO GO BACK TO THE WHARFS, BOARD AND PRESENT THOSE OPTIONS AND SEE IF THEY CAN WORK OUT AN AGREEMENT WITH THE WHARFS BOARD ON ONE OF THOSE LOCATIONS.

SO, YOU KNOW, IT IS MOVING IN A GOOD DIRECTION, I THINK.

AND OF COURSE, WE ALMOST TWO YEARS AGO PUT OUT A RESOLUTION THAT WE WOULD LIKE THE SHIP HERE [INAUDIBLE] BY THE COUNCIL.

AND I HOPE THAT'S STILL THE SAME WITH THIS COUNCIL.

AND SO WE'LL SEE IF WE CAN'T GET SOMETHING DONE AND GET THE SHIP HERE.

AND YOU SAID THE SOCIETY SAID THEY HAVE FUNDING.

[01:55:03]

I MEAN, THEY DO HAVE FUNDING SOURCES, ABSOLUTELY.

AND YOU KNOW, THEY'RE WILLING TO PAY FOR THEIR LEASE AGREEMENT, OF COURSE, AT THE PORT AND BUT THAT'LL BE WORKED OUT WITH THE WHARF BOARD.

AND, YOU KNOW, HOPEFULLY THEY CAN COME TO AGREEMENT.

AND JOHN HAS HAD, I GUESS I'D CALL IT A PASSION, JOHN.

YOU'VE HAD A PASSION FOR THIS TOPIC FOR A LITTLE WHILE.

WELL, I LOVE HISTORY. I THINK THE SHIP IS AN AMAZING PIECE OF HISTORY, AND IT WOULD BE, I THINK, A GREAT ASSET HERE IN GALVESTON.

I'D LOVE TO SEE IT DOWN HERE. SO HAPPY TO DO WHAT I CAN.

SO AND I'M GOING TO FACILITATE MEETINGS WITH THE PORT.

I TALKED TO THEIR CHAIRMAN, HARRY MAXWELL, YESTERDAY EVENING AND WE'LL BE MOVING FORWARD AND LETTING THEM GET WITH THE PORT AND SEE IF WE COULD POSSIBLY BE WORKED OUT OVER THERE.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THAT.

JUST ONE QUICKLY.

IS IT TO BE DONE. 23, WHERE IS IT GOING TO BE DOCKED? IT'S RIGHT NOW.

THE TEXAS IS JUST TO GIVE YOU AN UPDATE.

IT'S GOING TO BE A GULF COPPER WHEN IT DOES ITS REFURBISHMENT RIGHT ACROSS FROM PIER 20.

THERE TWENTY ONE AND THE DREDGING TO BRING IN THE DRY DOCK.

THERE'S A DRY DOCK THAT'S BEEN PURCHASED IN THE BAHAMAS.

JOHN, IS THAT RIGHT? AND THEY'RE DREDGING THAT AREA OVER THERE AT GULF COPPER WILL BE THAT DREDGING WILL BE COMPLETED IN APRIL MAY.

AND BECAUSE OF INSURANCE ISSUES THAT SHIP THEY'RE PLANNING, THAT DRY DOCK WILL BE IN PLACE IN JUNE.

BEFORE THE HURRICANE SEASON REALLY GETS GOING, AND I THINK THEY SAID MAYBE BY JULY JOHN DID YOU SAY. YES. THEY'LL HAVE THE SHIP OVER THERE IN GULF COPPER.

NOW WHERE THEY'RE GOING TO PERMANENTLY BE DOCKED YET THAT'S STILL TO BE DETERMINED.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? [INAUDIBLE] NO, NO.

OK, THANK YOU. VERY GOOD.

LET'S MOVE TO ITEM 3I.

[3.I. Council Updates]

3I COUNCIL UPDATES.

UPDATE OF THE COMMUNITY’S PLAN TO SUPPORT AN EXHIBIT AND MUSEUM COMMEMORATING JUNETEENTH.

SHARON. OKAY THE LATEST UPDATE WITH THAT.

I LOVE IT WHEN JOHN SAID HE LOVES HISTORY, AND THAT'S OUR ISLAND.

SO WE'VE HAD TALKS WITH THE CENTRAL CULTURAL CENTER AND THEY'VE GIVEN US UPDATES ON THE ACTIVITY AND HISTORICAL FOUNDATION WILL SET UP AN EXHIBIT AT ASHTON VILLA.

AND MY UNDERSTANDING IS IT'S A COMPANY OUT OF NEW ZEALAND, SO IT'S GOING TO BE LIKE AN INTERACTIVE REAL NEAT.

AND OF COURSE, THE QUESTION WAS CAN WE GET AN ARTIFACT THAT NO ONE ELSE HAS? SO I THINK WE HAVE AN ANSWER TO THAT TOO WITH THE HISTORICAL FOUNDATION.

SO THE CITY AND HISTORICAL FOUNDATION ARE GOING TO COLLABORATE TOGETHER AND PUSH THIS FORWARD. SO WE'RE JUST DELIGHTED AND, EXCITED.

IT'S AN EXCITING PROJECT AND WE'RE MOVING.

THERE WILL BE A SHORT TERM, AS SHARON MENTIONED WITH THE EXHIBIT AT ASHTON VILLA THAT WILL BE SPONSORED AND FUNDED BY GALVESTON HISTORICAL FOUNDATION.

AND THEN LOOKING FORWARD TO PUTTING PLANS TOGETHER FOR A PERMANENT MUSEUM HERE ON THE ISLAND TO COMMEMORATE JUNETEENTH.

SO. AND SHARON, THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR EFFORTS.

SHARON'S BEEN IN THE COMMUNITY BUILDING CONSENSUS ON THIS AND REALLY APPRECIATE ALL OF THOSE EFFORTS. THANK YOU.

THANKS. ALL RIGHT.

LET'S MOVE TO ITEM 3 I GUESS, TWO.

TWO UPDATE ON TXDOT BROADWAY CONSTRUCTION.

I PUT THIS ON THERE.

I GET SO MANY CALLS ABOUT THIS, BRIAN.

I KEEP SENDING THEM TO YOU.

LET ME START BY SAYING THIS IS A TXDOT PROJECT.

THE CITY'S INPUT IN IT HAS BEEN.

THEY'VE ALLOWED US TO HAVE INPUT AS TO THE SCOPE OF THE PROJECT, BUT THE ACTUAL PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK IS ENTIRELY TXDOT.

THE ONLY THING LEFT TO DO ON BROADWAY, THANK GOD NOW, IS JUST THE PAVING.

THE PAVING DOES INCLUDE ALL OF THE APPROACHES.

SO THEY'RE NOT JUST GOING TO PAVE BROADWAY AND LEAVE WHERE THEY'VE ANY PLACE THEY'VE MILLED UP THEY'RE GOING TO FIX.

AND SO, YOU KNOW, IN SOME OF THE APPROACHES TO MAKE THE APPROACH LEVELS CORRECT.

THEY'VE GONE FURTHER.

YOU NOTICE IT IN SOME STREETS THAT GO BACK ALMOST HALF A BLOCK.

OTHERS, THEY GO BACK 10 15 FEET.

BUT ALL OF THAT WILL BE PAVED.

THERE WAS AN ISSUE THAT WE CAUGHT THE CITY CAUGHT ACTUALLY, THANKS TO A CITIZEN TOO THAT REPORTED IT AS WELL.

OUR INSPECTOR CAUGHT IT AS WELL.

[02:00:02]

THEY HAD KIND OF OVERTOPPED THE CROSSINGS WITH SOME OF THE PAVING.

THAT'S WHY THAT WORK STOPPED TXDOT GOT INVOLVED BECAUSE REMEMBER, THE WHOLE PROCESS HERE WAS TO LOWER THE LEVEL OF BROADWAY A LITTLE BIT TO ALLOW SOME SHEET FLOW.

SO THEY'RE GOING TO FIX THE ONES, I THINK, 45TH 43RD THOSE ARE SOME OF THE BIGGER ISSUES, WHICH IS REALLY WHERE WE NEED SOME MORE FLOWS.

SO THEY'RE GOING TO FIX THAT.

THEY'RE ONLY HAMSTRUNG RIGHT NOW THERE.

THEY FEEL LIKE THEY HAVE LESS THAN 30 DAYS LEFT TO DO THE PROJECT.

HOWEVER, MUCH LIKE WE'RE RUNNING INTO WITH ALL OF OUR PROJECTS, YOU CAN'T REALLY LAY ASPHALT LESS THAN WHEN THE TEMPERATURE IS NOT CONSISTENTLY ABOVE 60 DEGREES.

THERE CAN'T BE ANY VARIATIONS IN THAT BECAUSE THE ASPHALT DOESN'T ADHERE WELL AND IT COOLS IN THE TRUCK AND THOUSAND ISSUES THAT THEY DEAL WITH, WITH ASPHALT, BUT THEY FEEL LIKE THEY'LL BE FINISHED. THEY HAVE ASSURED ME THAT REGARDLESS OF STATUS, WE WILL HAVE SIX LANES OR SEVEN, DEPENDING ON HOW YOU LOOK AT IT ON BROADWAY OPEN COMPLETELY FOR MARDI GRAS ONE WAY OR THE OTHER, AND THEY HAVE ALSO ASSURED ME THAT THEY WILL HAVE I45 OPEN SIX LANES ALL THE WAY TO THE BELTWAY.

SO FOR MARDI GRAS, WE SHOULD HAVE GOOD [INAUDIBLE] TXDOT HAS DONE A GREAT JOB OF WORKING WITH US THAT THEY HAVE PAVING LEFT.

THEY ARE GOING TO REPAIR THE CURBS THAT WERE DAMAGED.

AND THE OTHER THING THAT THEY WILL HAVE TO DO BUT THIS WILL NOT IMPEDE THE TRAFFIC THEY'RE GOING TO DO THE PAVING FIRST IS THAT WHEN THEY LOWER BROADWAY, IT THREW OFF THE CROSSINGS ON THE ESPLANADES WHERE THE WHEELCHAIRS CROSS.

NOW THEY HAVE TOO MUCH OF A GAP, SO THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO REINFORCE SOME OF THOSE WHEELCHAIR RAMPS AND THINGS LIKE THAT, AND THEY'RE TAKING CARE OF ALL OF THAT.

THAT'S ALL TXDOT. LIKE I SAID, ALL LANES WILL BE OPEN, AND THEY'RE ALSO GIVING US USE OF ALL THEIR MESSAGE BOARDS FOR MARDI GRAS, WHICH IS A BIG PLUS.

SO ALL IN ALL, BROADWAY WILL BE DONE HOPEFULLY WRAPPED UP BY WELL BEFORE SPRING BREAK.

AND THAT'S OUR MAIN GOAL THERE.

SO HAD A GOOD LONG TALK WITH HIM YESTERDAY AND VERY HAPPY ABOUT THAT BEING WRAPPED UP BECAUSE WE HEAR A LOT ABOUT IT, SO.

DAVID, I KNOW WE ALL GET CALLS ABOUT THIS, BELIEVE ME.

COUPLE OF THINGS THE PUBLIC OUGHT TO KNOW IS THAT SOME OF THE FINAL PAVING HAS BEEN DONE IN THE TRANSITIONS BETWEEN THE MEDIAN PLANTINGS THERE.

AND SOME OF IT MAY COME UP. WELL, GREAT BECAUSE SOME BECAUSE SOMEBODY SAID, WHO CAN I TALK TO ABOUT MY BROKEN WRIST WHEN THEY TRIED TO TURN ON TO AND THE WHEEL JERKING.

YEAH. I DON'T THINK THEY BROKE THEIR WRIST, BUT THE WHEEL JERKED OUT OF THEIR HAND AND THERE'S QUITE A TRANSITION WHERE YOU GO INTO THE SIDE STREETS.

SO UNFORTUNATELY, THE WAY THE WEATHER'S BEEN GOING LATELY, THEY'LL GET IN AND THEY'LL PAVE FOR A DAY, THEN THE TEMPERATURE DROPS AND THEY HAVE TO PULL BACK.

I MEAN, I'VE GOT THE SAME ISSUES. I DON'T SEE HOW THEY EVEN HAVE ROADS NORTH OF [INAUDIBLE]. THAT'S THE CASE WITH THE WEATHER.

BUT SO I'M HAPPY.

I'M HAPPY TO SEE THAT. I THINK PEOPLE OUGHT TO UNDERSTAND THAT WE HAVE SOME OTHER ISSUES COMING DOWN THE LINE, PROBABLY NOT THIS YEAR, BUT IF ANYBODY'S BEEN ACROSS THE CAUSEWAY SEES A COUPLE LANE CHANGES AT THE NORTH END OF THE CAUSEWAY ALREADY BECAUSE THEY'RE DRILLING AND DIGGING OVER THERE.

IT'S ALREADY 2022 AND THEY WILL LET OUR PORTION OF THAT PROJECT MEANING ALL THE WAY TO 60 OR 59TH STREET 2023.

SO AND THAT'S GOING TO GO FROM 59TH STREET TO THE Y, AND IT WILL BEGIN AT 2023 AND IT'LL END. [LAUGHTER] YEAH, YEAH, WHATEVER.

BUT THAT'S THE NEXT THING DOWN THE ROAD.

I MEAN THE I45 CONSTRUCTION FROM THE CAUSEWAY TO THE Y IS STARTING RIGHT NOW AND THAT'S GOING TO BE ITS OWN LITTLE MESS FOR A WHILE.

AND THEN THIS YEAR THEY'RE GOING TO LET THE CONTRACTS AND START WORKING ON THE 61ST STREET OVERPASS, AND THAT'S GOING.

IT'S GOING TO BE GREAT WHEN IT'S DONE, YOU KNOW? EVERYBODY LIKES NEW.

A FEW PEOPLE, INCLUDING MYSELF, HAVE PATIENCE FOR IT TO REALLY GET DONE CORRECTLY.

THAT'S ANY PROJECT THAT WE DO, BUT WE HOLD TIGHT.

IT'S BETTER OVERALL. SO OK.

SO AS LONG AS WE'RE ON THIS TOPIC OF PAVING STREETS, CAN I GET AN ESTIMATE WHEN 18TH STREET BALL STREET, THE THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN DUG UP FOR THE 18TH STREET PROJECT, WE'RE GOING TO WE'LL GET YOU A COMPLETE SCHEDULE UPDATE.

THANK YOU. VERY GOOD.

I HAVE ONE THING. YES, MA'AM. YEAH. AND BRIAN, I THINK IT'S ALREADY ON YOUR LIST AND I HOPE IT'S STILL THERE.

46TH STREET, WHERE TXDOT PARK THEIR EQUIPMENT.

YES. WE'VE HAD EMAILS REGARDING THIS.

RESIDENTS ARE VERY CONCERNED BECAUSE IT'S LEFT LOTS OF TAR.

SOME OF THE EQUIPMENT IS DESTROYED.

THEY'LL CLEAN UP ANYTHING THAT THEY'VE ASSURED US.

THEY'LL CLEAN UP ANY MESS THEY MAKE.

OK, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE IT'S NOT STILL ON YOUR LIST.

STILL THERE. BRIAN THE ONLY QUESTION I HAVE THAT THE ASPHALT IS LAID DOWN ON BROADWAY.

THEY'RE NOT GOING TO TOP THAT OFF.

YES. THEY WILL.

YES, BECAUSE THERE ARE SOME CUTS INTO THAT.

THEY HAVE NOT AND THEY DID THAT. IT'S NOT CONSISTENT.

IF YOU LOOK IT, CREATED A LEVEL SURFACE AND THEY HAD TO COME BACK IN AND DO SOME BASE

[02:05:02]

REPAIR BECAUSE THE LEVEL UP SHOWED THAT THE BASE WAS FAILING UNDERNEATH IT.

SO THAT'S ALL BEEN DONE NOW SO THAT THERE WILL BE A FINAL INCH AND A HALF LAYER OVER THE TOP OF EVERYTHING. OVER EVERYTHING THAT'S OUT THERE NOW.

YES SIR. THAT'S GOOD TO KNOW. OK, THANK YOU, BRIAN.

APPRECIATE THAT. ITEM 3J PLEASE.

I MEAN, JANELLE REPORT OF CITY COUNCIL'S PARK BOARD REPRESENTATIVE.

[3.J. Report Of City Council's Park Board Representative (Collins/Brown - 10 Minutes)]

I BELIEVE WE'VE COVERED A NUMBER OF PARK BOARD TOPICS THIS MORNING.

SO IF ANYONE HAS ANY QUESTIONS, I'M HAPPY TO ENTERTAIN, BUT I DON'T THINK I HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD TO WHAT WE'VE ALREADY DISCUSSED THIS MORNING.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE HAVE MARTY FLUKE PARK BOARD TRUSTEE OUT THERE.

MARTY, GLAD TO HAVE YOU WITH US TODAY.

HE SAT THROUGH THE ENTIRE WORKSHOP.

SO GOOD.

GLAD TO HAVE YOU. HOW THE CITY OPERATES FOR REAL.

YOU GOT TO GET A HOBBY MARTY [LAUGHTER].

VERY GOOD. IT IS 11:06 COUNCIL.

WE HAVE GONE THROUGH OUR COMPLETE WORKSHOP AGENDA.

CAN I ADJOURN THE MEETING.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

THANK YOU. OH HEY, BRIAN, WHEN YOU'RE TALKING TO GISD.

YEAH.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.