[INAUDIBLE] OK, IT'S FOUR O'CLOCK.
[Zoning Board of Adjustments on December 8, 2021.]
[00:00:03]
WE HAVE A QUORUM AND STAFF IS READY.ALL RIGHT. ANDREW GALETTI, I'D LIKE TO CALL THE ZONING BOARD MEETING TO ORDER DECEMBER 8TH. IT'S FOUR O'CLOCK.
AND CAN I GET A ROLL CALL, PLEASE? BOARD MEMBER [INAUDIBLE].
HERE. BOARD MEMBER [INAUDIBLE].
HERE. BOARD MEMBER [INAUDIBLE].
HERE. COUNCIL MEMBER [INAUDIBLE].
MARK IS ABSENT. OK, THANK YOU.
DOES ANYBODY HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON TODAY'S CASE? YES. OK.
LOOKS LIKE SHE'LL BE STEPPING AWAY, AND WE DO HAVE OUR ALTERNATE IN PLACE, CORRECT.
CORRECT. SUSAN [INAUDIBLE] WILL BE VOTING IN HER PLACE.
AND FOR THE RECORD, CAN WE STATE WHO HAS THE CONFLICT, JUST THE NAME OF THE COMMISSIONER? OK. MR. [INAUDIBLE]. AND SHE HAS A CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
THANK YOU. YOU'LL BE STEPPING OUT, STEPPING DOWN ON THIS VOTE, RIGHT, AND YOUR SCREEN WILL GO DARK.
HER SCREEN WILL GO DARK? YES, IF SHE HAS A CONFLICT OF INTEREST, YES.
SHE CAN STILL HEAR THE MEETING, BUT SHE WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CASE.
YES. UNTIL YOU DO THE CHAIRMAN THING.
RIGHT, ONLY WHEN THE CASE IS CALLED.
ALL RIGHT. WOULD HAVE A STAFF GIVE US A MEETING FORMAT, PLEASE.
SURE. JUST OUR STANDARD MEETING ROOM REMINDERS THAT IT'S BEST TO WATCH THE MEETING IN GALLERY VIEW BECAUSE YOU CAN SEE ALL OF YOUR COMMISSIONERS AT THE SAME TIME, AND THAT'S HOW IT'S SHOWN TO THE PUBLIC.
WE ASK THAT YOU KEEP YOURSELF MUTED UNLESS YOU'RE SPEAKING TO CUT DOWN ON BACKGROUND NOISE. WE ASK THAT YOU PHYSICALLY RAISE YOUR HAND TO GET THE CHAIR'S ATTENTION BEFORE SPEAKING OR MAKING A MOTION.
AND FOR THOSE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO ARE PARTICIPATING, WE'LL ASK THAT YOU USE THE RAISE HAND FEATURE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SCREEN WHEN YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION, AND THEN WE'LL BE TAKING THE VOTES BY ROLL CALL.
OK, I'M GOING TO OPEN THE FLOOR TO THE PUBLIC FOR ANY NON-AGENDA ITEMS. IS THERE ANYBODY HERE TODAY? THERE IS NO WRITTEN COMMENT RECEIVED, AND IF THERE ARE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON NON AGENDA ITEMS IF YOU COULD USE THE RAISE HAND FUNCTION. SEEING THAT.
I THINK THERE WAS A COMMENT RECEIVED.
I THOUGHT PATRICK SENT OUT A COMMENT SHEET, RIGHT THERE WERE COMMENTS RECEIVED FOR THE CASE. THANK YOU.
SORRY. OK, THEN MOVING ON TO NEW OLD BUSINESS.
LET'S SEE, WE ARE ALREADY MOVING ON TO OLD BUSINESS.
I GUESS WE DON'T HAVE ONE THERE [INAUDIBLE].
YEAH, SO WE NEED TO DO THE ELECTION OF THE CHAIR AND THE VICE CHAIR.
OK. ARE THERE ANY MOTIONS FOR.
YES. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT ANDREW GALLETTI SERVE AS CHAIR OF THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR NEXT YEAR.
THANK YOU. WE NEED A SECOND ON THAT.
WELL, YOU ACTUALLY DON'T NEED A SECOND.
DO WE VOTE ON BOTH CHAIRS SEPARATELY? ARE THERE ANY OTHER NOMINEES FOR CHAIR? DON'T SEE ANY OF THE HANDS, SO DO WE NEED A ROLL-CALL VOTE ON THAT? YES. OK.
CAN I PLEASE GET THAT NOW? ROLL CALL VOTE, PLEASE? BOARD MEMBER [INAUDIBLE].YES.
YES. BOARD MEMBER [INAUDIBLE].
I'M SORRY. BOARD MEMBER REILLY, WE DIDN'T GET YOUR VOTE.
I'M SORRY, I'M NOT IN CONTROL.
THANK YOU. ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION PASSES.
WE HAVE ELECTION FOR VICE CHAIR NOW.
I WOULD LIKE TO NOMINATE ROBERT GERTH FOR THAT POSITION.
[00:05:03]
IS THERE ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS FOR THAT POSITION? OK. SEEING NONE THEN I'D LIKE FOR A ROLL CALL, VOTE ON HIS BEHALF, PLEASE.YES. ALL IN FAVOR OF THAT MOTION PASSES.
ALL RIGHT, THANK Y'ALL AND THANK Y'ALL FOR YOUR VOTE OF CONFIDENCE.
WE'LL MOVE ON TO OUR NEW BUSINESS.
I THINK THERE'S ALSO THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES, WE HAVE TWO SETS OF MINUTES TO APPROVE AUGUST 4TH AND NOVEMBER THE 3RD.
DO WE TAKE THEM SEPARATELY? BUT CAN WE JUST TAKE THEM IN? YOU CAN TAKE THEM TOGETHER.
OK. AND WE DO HAVE APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
WE HAVE TWO SETS THAT WE'RE APPROVING HERE.
LOOKS LIKE WE'RE BEEN IN AND OUT OF THIS FOR A WHILE, LIKE A MOTION OF ANY CORRECTIONS OR ON THESE MINUTES. OK, SEEING NONE, AND THEN I LIKE TO GET A MOTION ON APPROVAL THESE MINUTES, PLEASE. YOU DON'T NEED A MOTION.
WE CAN JUST, THEY'RE APPROVED AS PRESENTED IF THERE AREN'T ANY CORRECTIONS.
OK, IF THERE AREN'T ANY CORRECTIONS, THEN WE WOULD LIKE TO DO THAT APPROVE AS SUBMITTED.
THANK ALL. NOW, MOVING ON TO NEW BUSINESS ALL RIGHT. IF EVERYONE IS READY, I'LL GO WITH 21Z-014.
THIS IS A SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUEST FOR THE REAR SETBACK.
THERE WERE THIRTY-THREE PUBLIC NOTICES SENT TO RETURNED, ONE IN FAVOR AND ONE OPPOSED.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A SPECIAL EXCEPTION FROM ARTICLE THREE, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY ADDENDUM IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED REAR SETBACK FROM TEN FEET TO FIVE FEET IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 12141 LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, REAL EXCEPTION MAY BE REQUESTED. WE'RE IN WHERE THE REAR YARD SET BACK WITHIN TWO OR MORE LOTS IN THE SAME BLOCK. DO NOT MEET THIS REAR YARD REQUIREMENT OF THE LDR.
PLEASE SEE EXHIBIT C FOR EXAMPLES OF OTHER STRUCTURES ON THE SUBJECT BLOCK CONSTRUCTED WITH A LESSER SET BACK THAN PRESCRIBED IN THE CURRENT REGULATIONS.
SO ONCE AGAIN IN R1 ZONING, THE TYPICAL REAR SET BACK IS 10 FEET.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO THE REAR SET BACK OR A SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO FIVE FEET. PLEASE NOTE THE CONDITIONS FOR A SPECIAL EXCEPTION IN THE STAFF REPORT.
I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO READ THE APPLICANT'S JUSTIFICATION INTO THE RECORD.
IT IS AS FOLLOWS RULE 12.401B2A2 REAR SIT BACK AS TEN FOOT WOULD LIKE TO MOVE FROM REQUIRED TEN FOOT TO FIVE FOOT TO ALLOW FOR AN OPEN COVERED PORCH STRUCTURE CONNECTED TO THE REAR OF THE HOUSE SEE ATTACHED PLAN OF SURROUNDING NEARBY HOUSES ON THE BLOCK HAVE LESS THAN TEN FOOT REAR SET BACK.
THE NEIGHBOR HAS A COVERED PORCH WITHIN THE TEN FOOT REAR SETBACK.
A HOUSE ACROSS THE STREET GOES WITHIN THE TEN FOOT REAR SET BACK IN THE HOUSE.
DOWN THE BLOCK IS ALSO WITHIN THE TEN FOOT REAR SETBACK.
WE PLAN TO CONFORM TO ALL OTHER LDR AND I.R.S.C REQUIREMENTS, ALL PUBLIC SAFETY REQUIREMENTS, STAYING FIVE FEET FROM PROPERTY LINE TO ENSURE THE STRUCTURE MEETS FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS.
THE NEIGHBOR ALSO HAS A BACK PORCH COVER WITHIN THE 10 FOOT SETBACK.
IT WILL BE SIMILAR TO THEIRS ASCE-7 AND TDI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE MET AND WINDSTORM APPLICATIONS FILED.
SO HERE WE HAVE ON THE LEFT OF A [INAUDIBLE] MAP SHOWING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
WE ALSO HAVE AN OBLIQUE AREA VIEW SHOWING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY'S REAR YARD SO THAT OBLIQUE VIEW HAS BEEN ROTATED SOMEWHAT SO YOU CAN SEE THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY A LITTLE BIT MORE CLEAR.
NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. AND HERE, ONCE AGAIN, ON THE LEFT, WE HAVE SOME MORE OBLIQUE AERIAL VIEWS. THE ONE ON THE LEFT SHOWS ONCE AGAIN, IT'S KIND OF THE NORTH FACE OF THE BUILDING AND THE SUBJECT OF THE PROPERTY AS IT RELATES TO OTHER HOUSES ALONG THE BLOCK.
AND THIS SHOWS A GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THAT, THAT BLOCK.
AND THEN ON THE RIGHT, WE HAVE THE APPLICANT SUBMITTAL, WHICH POINTS OUT, YOU KNOW, SOME OF THESE, YOU KNOW, VARIATIONS.
AND THIS CONCLUDES DAIS REPORT.
OK, THANK YOU. IS THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? WELL, THE ONLY ONE QUESTION I HAVE IS ON THE ONE THAT SAID SOMETHING, NO.
[00:10:05]
WHAT WAS STATED? GIVE ME ONE MORE. YEAH, GIVE ME ONE MOMENT, LET ME SEE IF I CAN PULL THAT UP ONE SECOND, I'LL HAVE IT. OK.IT LOOKS LIKE THAT THERE WERE NO EXPLANATIONS GIVEN IT WAS JUST A RETURN OPPOSED.
OK. MR. CLEMENT, DID YOU HAVE A QUESTION? I DO. THE RULE STATES THAT EXCEPTIONS CAN BE GRANTED IF TWO OR MORE PROPERTIES ON THE SAME BLOCK, AND I SEE THAT WE HAVE THREE PROPERTIES HERE, BUT MY QUESTION IS THE ONE THERE IN THE PHOTOGRAPH LABELED EIGHT FOOT HOUSE TO FENCE.
IS THAT CONSIDERED TO BE IN THE SAME BLOCKS AS IT'S ACROSS THE STREET? AND YOU THINK OF A CITY BLOCK? IT'S NOT ACTUALLY ON THE SAME BLOCK.
SO I'M JUST CURIOUS IF THAT IF THAT IS A LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT ENCOMPASSES SEVERAL CITY BLOCKS OR IF THAT'S ACTUALLY REFERRING TO THE CITY BLOCK.
I BELIEVE THAT IF KATHERINE CAN CORRECT ME, IF I'M WRONG, I BELIEVE THAT THE BLOC WOULD ONLY APPLY TO THE SAME KIND OF GEOGRAPHICAL AREA BETWEEN STREETS AS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
I DON'T BELIEVE WE WOULD CONSIDER THE HOUSE ACROSS THE STREET TO BE ON THE SAME BLOCK.
IS THAT RIGHT, CATHERINE? THAT'S RIGHT, DANIEL. OKAY, DOES THIS MEET THE REQUIREMENT OR NOT. FOR A SPECIAL CONDITION.
WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO READ THE BIT OF THE SUMMARY AGAIN FOR YOU? PLEASE. LET ME JUST REREAD THAT, I THINK IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 12.401 LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
REAR YARD EXCEPTION MAY BE REQUESTED WHERE THE REAR YARD SETBACK OF ANY TWO OR MORE LOTS IN THE SAME BLOCK DO NOT MEET THE REAR YARD REQUIREMENTS OF THE LDR.
IN THIS CASE, ONCE AGAIN, THAT REQUIREMENT WOULD BE 10 FOOT MINIMUM.
OK, THANK YOU, MS. HOLLOWAY. IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING, I HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF.
SURE, PLEASE. DANIEL, DO YOU CREATE THESE EXHIBITS OR DOES THE APPLICANT? THE APPLICANT SUBMITTED THIS EXHIBIT AND OF COURSE, WITH, YOU KNOW, ZBA REQUESTS, WE JUST PROVIDE THE INFORMATION THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.
DO YOU GIVE THEM SOME SORT OF A STANDARD OR EXPECTATION? I MEAN, BECAUSE THIS IS THE SECOND TIME WE'VE SEEN THESE EXAMPLES THAT ARE OUTSIDE OF THE SAME BLOCK CRITERION.
AND I WAS WONDERING IF YOU COULD ADVISE THE APPLICANTS THAT THEY HAVE TO STAY ON THE SAME BLOCK WHEN THEY'RE MAKING THESE TYPES OF APPLICATIONS? WE CAN CERTAINLY, YOU KNOW, TRY TO DO A BETTER JOB OF EXPLAINING WHAT WE CONSIDER A BLOCK AND WHAT THESE DEFINITIONS REALLY MEAN.
BUT YOU KNOW, THE APPLICANT IS AWARE OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS THAT ARE APPLICABLE AS WELL.
BUT YEAH, WE CAN CERTAINLY, YOU KNOW, ATTEMPT TO MAKE SURE THAT GOING FORWARD THAT FOLKS HAVE BETTER CLARITY. THANK YOU SO MUCH.
WOULD REALLY LIKE A CLARITY FOR US ALSO ON THAT, LIKE A LOT OF TIMES WHEN I THINK OF A BLOC, YOU KNOW, LIKE YOU SAID, IT'D BE KIND OF THE EXCEPTION OF WHAT ITS BACK AGAINST OR IF THERE'S ACTUALLY ANY HOMES ON THERE.
EXCUSE ME. GOING BACK TO THIS CASE, SO IS THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, MR. CLEMENT? YES, SIR.
YEAH. SO, SO WITH THAT QUESTION ANSWERED, THEN IN THE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH, THE ONE LABELED THREE FOOT COVERED PORCH DEFENSE.
APPEARS TO ME TO BE THE SAME SETBACK AS THE PROPERTY THAT'S MAKING THE REQUEST.
AND SO I GUESS MY QUESTION IS, ARE THESE THESE EXCEPTIONS THAT THEY'RE CLAIMING OR ARE THEY VERIFIED BY STAFF? A STAFF TYPICALLY MAKES SITE VISITS TO, YOU KNOW, TO THE TO THE LOCATIONS, BUT IN MANY CASES, FOR EXAMPLE, YOU KNOW, REAR YARD, SOMETIMES IT'S VERY DIFFICULT FOR US TO SEE WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON BECAUSE OF COURSE WE CAN'T GO ON TO PRIVATE PROPERTY WITH THAT INVITATION. SO SOMETIMES IT'S JUST DIFFICULT FOR US TO WORK OFF OF ANYTHING BUT THE AERIALS. BUT YOU MIGHT BE ABLE TO ASK THAT QUESTION OF THE APPLICANT AND GET SOME CLARIFICATION. OK.
[00:15:01]
IS ANY MORE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? OK. IT'S THE APPLICANT HERE IN THE ROOM WITH US.WOULD YOU LIKE TO ADDRESS THE STAFF? YES, JEFFREY BISHOP HAS HIS HAND RAISED, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND ALLOW YOU TO SPEAK, SO YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO UNMUTE ON YOUR END AND ADDRESS THE COMMISSION.
HEY, CAN YOU GUYS HEAR ME? YOU SURE CAN.
SO THE TO CONFORM EXACTLY TO THE SPECIAL EXEMPTION, THERE IS TWO HOUSES WITHIN THE TEN FOOT SETBACK ON THE BLOCK.
WELL, ONE OF IS THE PORCH, THE OTHER ONE'S A HOUSE FURTHER DOWN THE ROAD.
AND IF YOU LOOK AT THAT ENTIRE BLOCK, THERE'S QUITE A BIT OF BASICALLY THREE ACCESSORIES ARE DIRECTLY AGAINST THE REAR FENCE.
I KNOW ACCESSORIES ARE A DIFFERENT TYPE OF STRUCTURE THAN THE MAIN STRUCTURE.
THEY'RE SIX FEET AWAY FROM THE MAIN HOUSE.
AND SO BUT THERE'S PEOPLE ON THE STREET, HAVE REAR GARAGES THAT ARE UP AGAINST THE FENCE.
SO, YOU KNOW, I DON'T KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THAT DOES FOR MY SPECIAL [INAUDIBLE], AND I JUST WANT TO NOTE THAT, YOU KNOW, THERE'S BUILDING THERE'S STUFF UP AGAINST THE FENCE LINE ALL THE WAY DOWN THIS BLOCK.
AND I THINK WHAT A PART OF THE 10 FOOT THING IS, IS THAT THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS WEREN'T IN EFFECT IN THIS AREA, POTENTIALLY WHEN ALL THIS STUFF WAS BUILT.
SO MAYBE THAT'S WHY THERE'S A HOUSE THAT'S WITHIN THE 10 FOOT SET BACK.
AND THEN THERE'S THE NEIGHBOR'S PORCH COVERED WITHIN THE 10 FOOT SETBACK AS WELL, BECAUSE THERE WASN'T THEY WEREN'T ASKING FOR EXEMPTIONS THEN BECAUSE THERE WAS NO LDRS IN PLACE THEN. SO I THINK THAT'S KIND OF THAT'S WHAT THAT'S HOW I PERCEIVE WHAT'S HAPPENING HERE BECAUSE I WAS TRYING TO FIGURE OUT MYSELF, YOU KNOW, HOW OTHER PEOPLE COULD BUILD ON THAT PARTICULAR REAR SETBACK, AND WE NEEDED TO ASK FOR THE EXEMPTION IN THE FIRST PLACE.
BUT NOW I FULLY UNDERSTAND WHAT IT IS.
AND SO, YOU KNOW, I DISCOVERED THAT WE FELL UNDER THE RULES OF THIS SPECIAL EXEMPTION.
SO THAT'S WHAT I'M TRYING TO GO THROUGH THIS PROCESS AND FOLLOW WHATEVER PATH WE NEED TO JUST GET THIS GUY HIS COVERED PORCH IN HIS REAR OF HIS HOUSE IF POSSIBLE.
ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? THE TWO GARAGES YOU MENTIONED ON THAT SAME BLOCK THAT ARE WITHIN THAT ARE ALMOST BUILT AGAINST THE PROPERTY LINE, WHICH TWO ARE THEY KIND OF LOOK INTO THE OVERHEAD THEY'RE TRYING TO? ARE THEY ON THE SAME? THEY ARE ON THE SAME BLOCK THERE.
YEAH, THEIR SENSORY STRUCTURES.
SO THEY'RE NOT ONES THAT I'VE CALLED OUT IN THAT PICTURE.
BUT IF YOU JUST LOOK AT AN AERIAL OF THAT AREA, THERE'S THREE OF THEM 7810, 7818, AND 7822 THAT ARE UP AGAINST THE FENCE, THE REAR FENCE LINE.
BUT AS I'VE LEARNED, ACCESSORY STRUCTURES AREN'T THE SAME AS THE MAIN STRUCTURE, WHICH IS WHAT WE'RE DOING BECAUSE WE DON'T WANT TO HAVE THE PORCH SIX FEET AWAY FROM THE, YOU KNOW, START SIX FEET AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURE WE JUST WANT TO HAVE.
WE CAN GO OUT ON THIS BACK PORCH.
SO WHAT I'VE LEARNED IS WE STILL GOT TO STAY FIVE FEET AWAY FROM THE PROPERTY LINE, SO WE DON'T HAVE ANY FIRE CODE ISSUES THAT WE THAT WE HAD TO CONFORM TO BECAUSE.
YOU KNOW, THERE WOULDN'T BE A WAY TO PUT A ONE HOUR FIREWALL ON A STRUCTURE LIKE THIS, IT'S JUST GOING TO BE A SIMPLE, WOOD FRAMED, COVERED PORCH CANOPY, [INAUDIBLE], WHATEVER YOU WANT TO CALL IT. OK.
IS THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? OKAY. SEEING NONE.
I THANK YOU, SIR, FOR COMING, AND WE'RE GOING TO RETURN THE MEETING TO THE BOARD NOW.
APPRECIATE IT. ACTUALLY, BEFORE WE TURN TO THE BOARD, IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE PRESENT IN THE ROOM THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS? DOES ANYBODY ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK, WE ASK THAT YOU USE THE WAVE HAND FUNCTION AT THE BOTTOM OF YOUR SCREEN? SEEING NONE. OK, THANK YOU.
I'D LIKE TO RETURN TO THE BOARD HERE FOR A MOTION AND DISCUSSION.
[00:20:01]
MS. [INAUDIBLE].BARBARA, OK. GO AHEAD, BARBARA.
A LOT TALLER. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL EXEMPTION FROM ARTICLE THREE IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE REAR SET BACK FROM TEN FEET TO FIVE FEET BECAUSE. OH, THE MOTION IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 12.4012A, A2 IN THAT TWO OR MORE LOTS IN THE SAME BLOCK, MEET THE REAR YARD REQUIREMENTS OF THESE REGULATIONS.
OK, DO I HAVE A SECOND ON THAT.
YES, SIR, MR. [INAUDIBLE]. OH, SECOND, THAT.
AND ANY AT THIS POINT, ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS HERE ? I GUESS [INAUDIBLE] A DISCUSSION I'D LIKE TO JUST ADD THAT I SEE THE NEED BECAUSE OF THE GARAGES, I DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW THEY'RE NOT STRUCTURES BECAUSE THEY ACTUALLY ARE STRUCTURES, AND IT LOOKS LIKE TO ME THAT THEY DO MEET THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION, YOU KNOW, OF MORE THAN TWO ITEMS IN THE SAME BLOCK BEING PUT THERE.
OK, IF THERE'S NO MORE DISCUSSION, I'M GOING TO GO IN AND CALL FOR A VOTE.
OK, I CAN HAVE A ROLL CALL VOTE, PLEASE.
YES. BOARD MEMBER [INAUDIBLE].
YES. ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION PASSES.
ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. AND THANK YOU FOR COMING, MR. BISHOP. APPRECIATE IT.
AT THIS POINT, I DO NOT SEE ANY MORE CASES ON THE ON US.
IS THIS THE ONLY ONE FOR TODAY STAFF? THAT'S ALL THAT'S ON THE AGENDA TODAY.
OK, DO WE NEED ANYTHING? WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT THE ON RECORD.
DO WE NEED TO TALK ANYTHING ABOUT SHOWING UP ON FOR, I GUESS, FEBRUARY IN MEETING? SURE. SO THE MEETING IN JANUARY IS SCHEDULED TO BE VIRTUAL.
CURRENTLY, WE DON'T HAVE ANY CASES THAT HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED, SO I'LL UPDATE THE COMMISSION IF WE GET ANY CASES.
OTHERWISE, IF WE HAVE ANY CASES IN FEBRUARY, THAT MEETING WILL BE IN PERSON.
ANYTHING ANYBODY ELSE WOULD LIKE TO ADD ANYTHING BEFORE WE CLOSE THIS? CAN YOU OPEN UP [INAUDIBLE] SCREEN KATHERINE? SORRY ABOUT THAT. OK, THERE YOU GO.
WELL, THERE'S NOTHING ELSE SAID WE'D LIKE TO GO AND CLOSE THIS MEETING.
I THANK EVERYBODY FOR SHOWING UP AND YOU ALL HAVE A SAFE CHRISTMAS AND MERRY CHRISTMAS.
HAPPY NEW YEAR. HAPPY HOLIDAYS, EVERYONE.
YEAH. HAPPY HOLIDAYS, EVERYONE.
BYE BYE. BYE BYE.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.