>> WELL, I'D LIKE TO WELCOME EVERYBODY TO LANDMARK COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING.
[Landmark Commission on November 15, 2021.]
[00:00:05]
TODAY IS MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15TH, 2020 AND THE TIME IS FOUR O'CLOCK.I'D LIKE TO CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER AND START WITH THE ATTENDANCE.
>> COMMISSIONER STETZEL-THOMPSON.
>> WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ON TO DO A RECOGNITION OF JOANNE GRIFFIN WHO WORKED WITH ME FOR OVER A YEAR AS AN ALTERNATE AND THEN THE LAST FIVE PLUS YEARS ON THE COMMISSION TOGETHER.
CATHERINE, DID YOU HAVE SOMETHING YOU WANTED TO SAY ON THAT?
>> NO. UNFORTUNATELY, JOANNE COULDN'T JOIN US TODAY.
SHE'S DOING A LOT OF GRANDMOTHER DUTIES.
BUT WE WOULD JUST LIKE TO SAY THANK YOU TO JOANNE FOR HER DEDICATED SERVICE OF SIX YEARS TO THE LANDMARK COMMISSION.
I THINK SHE BROUGHT A VERY EVEN KEELED DISPOSITION, WHICH IS AN IMPORTANT THING ON THE COMMISSION.
I [OVERLAPPING] WOULD SAY THAT EVEN THOUGH SHE WAS MY NINTH GRADE MATH TEACHER, I FINALLY LEARNED TO CALL HER JOANNE AND NOT MRS. GRIFFIN.
>> YES, ABSOLUTELY. SHE TAUGHT AT BALL HIGH FOR MORE THAN 20 YEARS.
SHE TAUGHT MYSELF AND A COUPLE OTHER MEMBERS OF STAFF, PETE MELBOURNE, VIRTUE GROB.
SHE WAS A TERRIFIC TEACHER. [OVERLAPPING]
>> I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THAT I REALLY APPRECIATED JOANNE'S ABILITY TO DRILL DOWN TO THE GRANULAR LEVEL ON THINGS AND OFTEN PICK UP STUFF THE REST OF THE COMMISSIONERS SETTLED FOR.
SHE WAS ALWAYS REALLY GOOD ABOUT FOLLOWING UP ON CASES THAT HAD COME THROUGH AND WERE WAITING TO COME INTO CONFORMANCE AND SHE WAS REALLY GOOD ON STAYING ON TOP OF THAT.
IT'S AN ASSET WE'RE GOING TO MISS FOR SURE.
>> WE'VE GOTTEN A PLAQUE THAT ONCE WE GET IT DELIVERED, WE'LL DROP OFF AT HER HOUSE AND SO SHE'LL HAVE A MEMORY OF ALL OF US.
>> DOES ANYBODY HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST? SEEING NONE, MOVING ON.
SINCE EVERYBODY HAD A CHANCE TO REVIEW THE MINUTES, DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY CHANGES THEY SEE THAT COULD BE MADE TO THE MINUTES? NO. MINUTES ARE APPROVED AS PRESENTED. MEETING FORMAT.
>> I JUST HAVE A STANDARD MEETING REMINDERS THAT IT'S BEST TO WATCH THE MEETING IN GALLERY VIEWS.
THAT'S HOW IT'S SHOWN TO THE PUBLIC AND YOU CAN SEE ALL OF YOUR COMMISSIONERS AT THE SAME TIME.
WE ASK THAT YOU KEEP YOURSELF MUTED UNLESS YOU'RE SPEAKING TO CUT DOWN ON BACKGROUND NOISE.
WE ASK THAT YOU PHYSICALLY RAISE YOUR HAND TO GET THE CHAIR'S ATTENTION BEFORE SPEAKING OR MAKING A MOTION.
FOR THE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO ARE ON THE CALL, WE WILL ASK THAT YOU USE THE RAISE HAND FUNCTION TO INDICATE THAT YOU'D LIKE TO SPEAK.
>> DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS ON AGENDA AND NON-AGENDA ITEMS?
>> NO PUBLIC COMMENT WAS RECEIVED.
>> OKAY. MOVING ON, WE'RE GOING TO GO TO THE CONSENT AGENDA.
>> CONSENT AGENDA ITEM TODAY IS 21LC064, IT'S 2013 AVENUE M, REQUEST FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR ALTERATIONS TO THE STRUCTURE INCLUDING WINDOW REPLACEMENT.
STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL.
>> DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR DO YOU FEEL YOU'D LIKE TO HAVE THIS CASE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA? SEEING NONE, COULD I GET A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA? SHARON.
>> ON CASE 21LC064, I RECOMMEND THAT WE APPROVE THIS MOTION.
>> ALL IN FAVOR? CONSENT APPROVED
>> COULD WE DO A ROLL CALL VOTE?
>> I AM SORRY. I THOUGHT IT WAS JUST IN THE CONSENT IF ANYONE OBJECTED.
>> IT'S EASIER FOR US TO TRACK ROLL CALL.
[00:05:04]
>> COMMISSIONER STETZEL-THOMPSON?
>> ALL IN FAVOR, THE MOTION PASSES.
>> NEW BUSINESS AND ASSOCIATED PUBLIC HEARINGS.
THIS CASE 21LC-0631903, AVENUE L.
>> I'LL JUST MAKE A CORRECTION.
THE STAFF REPORT HAD THE INCORRECT ADDRESS ON IT.
THE REQUEST IS, A REQUEST FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW GARAGE.
FIVE PUBLIC NOTICES WERE SENT, ONE RETURNED TO THAT ONE IN FAVOR.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL TO BUILD A NEW REAR GARAGE.
THE GARAGE IS A SIMPLE ONE STORY DESIGN AND LOCATED AT THE REAR OF THE LOT.
THE GARAGE WILL BE ACCESSED FROM AN EXISTING CURB CUT.
THE MATERIALS ARE COMPOSITION ROOFING AND CEMENTITIOUS FIBER BOARD SIDING.
PLEASE NOTE THAT ONE STORY GARAGES ARE TYPICALLY REVIEWED ADMINISTRATIVELY.
IN THIS CASE, LANDMARK COMMISSION REVIEW IS REQUIRED DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE GARAGE WILL BE VISIBLE FROM 19TH STREET.
PLEASE NOTE THE DESIGN STANDARDS IN YOUR STAFF REPORT.
CONFORMANCE, STAFF FINDS THE REQUESTS CONFORMS TO THE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR HISTORIC PROPERTIES.
THE GARAGE DESIGN IS SIMPLE AND WILL NOT DETRACT FROM THE SURROUNDING HISTORIC BUILDINGS.
THERE IS AN EXISTING CURB CUT THAT WILL BE UTILIZED TO ACCESS THE GARAGE, SO NO NEW CURB CUTS ARE NECESSARY.
STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.
CONDITION 1, THE APPLICANT SHALL CONFORM TO THE DESIGN MATERIALS AND PLACEMENT AS INDICATED AN ATTACHMENT A WITH THE FOLLOWING CLARIFICATION.
THE CEMENTITIOUS FIBER BOARD SHALL BE SMOOTH TEXTURED.
THEN ITEMS 2-6 ARE STANDARD AND WE HAVE SOME PICTURES.
[NOISE] THIS IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ALONG AVENUE L. THIS IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ALONG 19TH STREET AND THIS IS THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED GARAGE.
THE PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTH AND EAST.
THEN THE GARAGE PLANS AND YOU CAN SEE IT'S A VERY SIMPLE BUILDING, AND THE SITE PLAN.
THAT CONCLUDES STAFF'S REPORT.
DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? NO. I HAVE ONE, CATHERINE.
WHEN I LOOK AT THE SURVEY WITH THE GARAGE ON IT, IT LOOKS AS THOUGH THE VERY OUTSIDE PERIMETER OF THIS GARAGE COMES RIGHT INTO THAT LOT LINE WHICH IS ALONG THE FENCE LINE.
IS THERE NOT AN EASEMENT FOR THAT? IS THERE NOT EASEMENT REQUIREMENT?
>> THERE'S NOT A SETBACK REQUIREMENT ALONG THAT PROPERTY LINE, NO.
>> ANYBODY ELSE HAVING ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NO. WELL, I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ASK IF THE HOME OWNER, DON OR PAULA CAMPBELL IS HERE, OR A REPRESENTATIVE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ABOUT THIS CASE?
>> IT LOOKS LIKE DON CAMPBELL SIGNED IN.
WE'LL GO AHEAD AND UNMUTE YOUR MICROPHONE.
MR. CAMPBELL, YOU'VE BEEN UNMUTED ON OUR END AND YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION.
>> THANK YOU. I HOPE IT'S STRAIGHTFORWARD AND APPEARS AS IT IS THAT WE FEEL WE MET THE CONSTRAINTS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND WE DO WANT JUST A SIMPLE GARAGE.
WE DO WANT IT TO BE IN LINE WITH ALL THE REQUIREMENTS AND ESSENTIALLY APPEAR THE SAME WITH COLOR AND EVERYTHING WITH THE HOUSE.
THE APPROPRIATE BUILDING MATERIALS WE BELIEVE ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS.
>> OKAY. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. CAMPBELL? NO. MR. CAMPBELL, YOU HAVE A BEAUTIFUL PROPERTY.
I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WERE THE OWNERS WHEN THEY CAME TO US MAYBE ABOUT FOUR OR FIVE YEARS AGO TO ADD THAT BALCONY ABOVE, BUT I REMEMBER BACK IN THAT TIME I'VE ALWAYS LIKED THAT PROPERTY.
THAT WAS VERY PRETTY. IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS FOR MR. CAMPBELL, I'M GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK TO THE COMMISSION AND ENTERTAIN A MOTION, PLEASE. SARAH.
>> I MAKE A MOTION WE APPROVE CASE 21LC-063 WITH THE STAFF'S CONDITION OF APPROVED REGISTERED BY THE BOARD.
[00:10:01]
>> YOU'RE GOING TO DO THE SECOND.
IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION, ANYTHING ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO SAY? NO. WE'RE READY FOR A VOTE.
>> COMMISSIONER MCLEAN? [LAUGHTER]
>> NO, YOU'RE FINE. WE CAN SEE YOU.
THAT'S EMBARRASSING. [LAUGHTER]
>> COMMISSIONER STETZEL-THOMPSON.
>> ALL IN FAVOR, THE MOTION PASSES.
>> WONDERFUL. IS THERE ANYTHING ANY COMMISSIONERS WOULD LIKE TO ADD TO THE AGENDA NEXT TIME OR ANY THING THE COMMISSIONER WOULD LIKE TO MENTION AT THIS TIME? DOUG.
>> I JUST WANTED TO ASK STAFF IF THEY KNEW HOW THE CEMENTITIOUS FIBER BOARD WAS HOLDING UP IN THE LONGEVITY TEST BECAUSE WE'RE APPROVING IT A LOT BUT I DON'T KNOW WHAT ITS DURABILITY IS.
STARTING INTO NEW PROJECTS, I WANT TO BE ABLE TO BE CONFIDENT IN PROPOSING THAT MATERIAL.
I'M JUST WONDERING HOW IT'S HOLDING UP.
>> WE COULD PUT THAT ON AS A DISCUSSION ITEM FOR THE NEXT MEETING.
>> IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE THAT WOULD HAVE ANYTHING THEY'D LIKE TO PUT ON THE AGENDA FOR THE NEXT TIME OR ANYTHING THEY'D LIKE TO SAY? SEEING NONE, I'M GOING TO ADJOURN THIS MEETING. THANK YOU, EVERYBODY.
>> THANK YOU. [OVERLAPPING]
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.