[7.A.1. 21P-009 (43 Grand Beach Blvd) Request For A Beachfront Construction Certificate/Dune Protection Permit In Order To Construct A Single-Family Dwelling. The Legal Description Of The Property Is Lot 10, Block 2, The Preserve At Grand Beach (2014), A Subdivision In The City And County Of Galveston, Texas. Applicant: SRR Construction Services LLC – Steven Ramirez Property Owner: Gilbert & Mary Ann Markarian]

DID ANYONE HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF THAT HAS NOT BEEN ANSWERED PREVIOUSLY? COMMISSIONERS? YES.

COMMISSIONER PENA.

SO I LOST MY VIDEO FEED THERE.

I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IT WAS KNOWN TO THE PUBLIC THE ANSWER, THE QUESTIONS THAT WE HAD REGARDING HOA, THE COMMENT, A LOT OF THE COMMENTS THAT WE RECEIVED HAD A LOT OF QUESTIONS IN REGARDS TO COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS.

AND THAT IS NOT SOMETHING THAT WE ARE CONSIDERING HERE IN THIS PROPOSAL.

IS THAT CORRECT? IN OUR PERSPECTIVE, THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE DO NOT WE WILL NOT CONSIDER.

RIGHT. THAT WAS EXACTLY WHAT WE HAD SAID AT THE VERY START.

IT SOUNDED LIKE ALL THE PUBLIC COMMENT, THE FOUR PUBLIC COMMENTS, WHICH WERE FROM TWO INDIVIDUALS, ALL REGARDING THINGS THAT WOULD BE ADDRESSED OR SHOULD BE ADDRESSED, BY THE HOA, RATHER THAN THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION.

THEY ARE NOT WITHIN OUR PURVIEW OF A BEACH FRONT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT.

THERE ARE THINGS THAT SHOULD BE ADDRESSED, BY THE WAY.

YOU'RE EXACTLY RIGHT.

THANK YOU. SORRY I JUMPED IN THERE AND ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION FOR YOU, VIRGI? COMMISSIONERS, DID WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? YES, SIR, COMMISSIONER, VICE CHAIRPERSON BROWN? WELL, ONE OF THE QUESTIONS WAS IT APPEARED TO BE DISPUTING THE FACT THAT THE CONSTRUCTION WAS NOT LANDWARD OF THE 25 FOOT OFFSET OF THE NORTH [INAUDIBLE] THE DUNE AND FROM THE SITE PLAN AND THE GROUND FLOOR PLAN, IT LOOKS LIKE THE CONSTRUCTION IS CLEARLY LANDWARD OF THE 25 FOOT OFFSET TO THE NORTH [INAUDIBLE] OF THE DUNE, DESPITE WHAT ONE OF THE COMMENTS CLAIMS. SO I JUST WANTED TO POINT THAT OUT, MAKE THAT CLEAR, RIGHT, AND THEY MIGHT HAVE AN OVERHANG OF AN AWNING OR A ROOF OR WHATEVER, BUT IT IS CLEARLY OUTSIDE THE 25 FOOT MARK.

RIGHT. AND TO BE CLEAR, THE NOTES AND NOTES THAT ARE ON THAT GROUND FLOOR PLAN BECAUSE IT'S A FRONT YARD AND SIDE YARD SETBACK OVERHANGING [INAUDIBLE] ARE PLAN ARTICULATIONS AND PORCHES ALLOWED, I ASSUME COME FROM LANGUAGE FROM AN HOA DOCUMENT.

OK, THANK YOU.

ALL RIGHT, ANYTHING ELSE COMMISSIONERS? ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ALL RIGHT, SEEING NONE.

WE WILL OPEN OUR PUBLIC HEARING AT 4:26.

AND DO WE HAVE THE APPLICANT ON THE LINE? THIS IS MIKE GAERTNER, I'M THE ARCHITECT.

THE APPLICANT, STEVE RAMIREZ, IS THE BUILDER, AND GILBERT AND MARIANNE MARKARIAN ARE ALL ALSO ON THE LINE.

AND I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE FOR THE APPLICANTS.

WELL, FIRST OF ALL, THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR HANGING IN WITH US.

YOU ALL WITH OUR, THROUGH OUR TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES, CERTAINLY WAS NOT PLANNED TO MAKE US SIT AND WAIT LONGER THAN WE WE HAD TO.

DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING THAT YOU'D LIKE TO SAY BEFORE WE ASK ANY QUESTIONS? I THINK THE ONLY THING THAT IS PROBABLY PERTINENT, THERE HAS BEEN SOME DISCUSSION ABOUT THE HOA AND AS CATHERINE AND BOB, BOTH AND STEPHEN HAVE ALL POINTED OUT, HOA APPROVAL HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH BEACHFRONT CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE.

HOWEVER, THE OWNERS WANTED ME TO POINT OUT THAT THE BOARD OF THE HOA HAS MET AND REVIEWED THE DRAWINGS AND APPROVED THEM.

SO THAT PART IS DONE.

AND THEN ONCE THE BEACHFRONT CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE IS APPROVED OR IF IT IS APPROVED,

[00:35:01]

THEN THE APPLICANT WILL APPLY FOR A BUILDING PERMIT AND THAT WILL COMPLETE THE REGULATORY PROCESS REQUIRED TO MOVE FORWARD WITH CONSTRUCTION.

OK, THANK YOU.

COMMISSIONERS, DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT OR THE APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE? I DON'T SEE ANY AT ALL AND COMMISSIONERS, YOU HAVE ALL HAD ADEQUATE TIME NOW NOT ONLY TO HEAR THE PUBLIC COMMENTS, BUT TO READ THEM AS WELL, SINCE WE ALL RECEIVE THEM BY EMAIL.

SO AT THAT, WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 4:28 AND I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON CASE 21P-009.

COMMISSIONER HOLLAWAY? CAN'T HEAR YOU, CAROL.

EXCUSE ME, I MAKE A MOTION AT 21P-009 BE ACCEPTED AS WRITTEN.

I'LL SECOND.

OH, WE HAVE JEFF ANTONELLI, COMMISSIONER ANTONELLI FOR A SECOND.

IS THERE A DISCUSSION COMMISSIONERS? SEEING NO DISCUSSION WE'LL CALL FOR A VOTE ON THIS, PLEASE, MS. GORMAN, COMMISSIONER ANTONELLI? I'M IN FAVOR.

VICE CHAIRPERSON BROWN? IN FAVOR.

MEMBER HILL? IN FAVOR.

COMMISSIONER HOLLAWAY? IN FAVOR.

COMMISSIONER PENA? IN FAVOR.

COMMISSIONER WALLA? IN FAVOR, ALL IN FAVOR, THE MOTION PASSES.

THANK YOU. SO NOW WE AFTER THAT PASSED UNANIMOUSLY, WE WILL MOVE ON TO 21P-013

[7.B.1. 21P-013 (315 23rd Street / Tremont) Request For A License To Use Agreement In Order To Place An Emergency Egress Stair And Landing In The City Of Galveston Right-Of- Way. Property Is Legally Described As The North 45 Feet Of Lots 8 & 9 (8-2), Block 563, In The City And County Of Galveston, Texas. Applicant: Brax Easterwood, AIA Adjacent Property Owner: Meillur, LLC Easement Holder: City Of Galveston]

LICENSE TO USE.

OKAY, SURE.

LET ME GET TO THAT REPORT ONE SECOND.

IT'S 21P-013, IT'S A LICENSE TO USE REQUEST.

THERE WERE 51 NOTICES SENT.

18 OF THOSE WERE RETURNED ALL IN FAVOR.

THERE WERE NO OBJECTIONS FROM CITY DEPARTMENTS.

A LITTLE BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE PROPERTY.

IT'S CURRENTLY UNDERGOING RENOVATIONS TO ADD FOUR ADDITIONAL UNITS TO THE EXISTING MULTIFAMILY BUILDING.

DURING THE PERMITTING PROCESS, THE CITY REQUESTED AN ADDITIONAL EGRESS EXIT TO BEING INSTALLED IN ORDER TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF TWO EMERGENCY EXITS FOR THE 2012 IBC AS IT WAS ORIGINALLY DESIGNED. THE BUILDING CURRENTLY ONLY PROVIDES ONE EXIT FOR OCCUPANTS TO UTILIZE DURING EMERGENCY SITUATIONS.

THEREFORE, THIS IS A REQUEST, YOU KNOW, IN AN EFFORT BY THE APPLICANT TO ADDRESS THOSE LIFE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS OF THE BUILDING CODE.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A PERMANENT LICENSE TO USE FOR THE EGRESS STAIRS AND LANDING AS REQUIRED BY THE 2012 IBC.

THE PROPOSED STAIR AND LANDING WILL ENCROACH JUST OVER FOUR FEET INTO THE ALLEY RIGHT AWAY, AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT B OF YOUR REPORT.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION DUE TO SPACE CONSTRAINTS.

AS THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT COVERS, THE ENTIRE LOT AREA, STAFF FINDS THAT THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY STAIR LANDING LOCATION IS PREFERRED FOR LIFE SAFETY REASONS.

STAFF RECOMMENDS CASE 21P-013 BE APPROVED WITH THE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS LISTED IN YOUR REPORT. ONE AND TWO AND STANDARD CONDITIONS 3-8 ON PAGE THREE OF THE REPORT.

AND NOW WE HAVE SOME PHOTOS.

THIS IS AN AREA IMAGE TO THE SUBJECT SITE.

NEXT SLIDE, CATHERINE, PLEASE.

THIS IS THE SUBJECT ALLEY, WHERE THE PROPOSED STAIR AND LANDING WILL BE PLACED.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND WEST, AND THAT INCLUDES STAFF'S REPORT.

THANK YOU, ADRIEL. ALL RIGHT, COMMISSIONERS.

DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? COMMISSIONER HOLLAWAY? USUALLY WHEN WE GET THESE REQUESTS TO USE, LIKE ENCROACHMENTS ON THE ALLEYWAY, WE'RE GIVEN SOME MEASUREMENTS TO GIVE US SOME IDEA OF THE ENCROACHMENT AS WELL AS THE FREE SPACE.

I UNDERSTAND THAT FOUR FEET WILL BE DEDICATED TO THIS THROUGH THIS EIGHTY EIGHT LANDING.

HOW MUCH EXTRA FEET YOU HAVE IN THAT ALLEY SO THAT EMERGENCY VEHICLES CAN CAN MANEUVER.

[00:40:08]

THERE ARE CURRENTLY OBSTRUCTIONS ON BOTH SIDES OF THAT ALLEY, SO IF MY EDUCATED GUESS WOULD BE 12 FEET OR SO.

OK, THERE'S NO PLANS ON MOVING ANY OF THOSE OBSTRUCTIONS IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE THE LANDING? NO, NOT TO MY KNOWLEDGE.

OK. SO YEAH AND.

THANK YOU. AND OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS SUCH AS FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE DID NOT HAVE ANY OBJECTIONS TO TO THE TO THE LANDING AND STAIR AND THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES TO BE ABLE TO PASS.

RIGHT. RIGHT. OK, THANK YOU SO MUCH.

OF COURSE.

VICE CHAIRPERSON BROWN? YEAH.

I WAS JUST WONDERING, WHEN WE SEE FIRE EXITS ON THE EXTERIOR SIDE OF THE BUILDING THEY'RE ORDINARILY METAL, MADE OF METAL FOR FIRE RESISTANCE PURPOSES.

I'M JUST WONDERING, OBVIOUSLY, IT DOESN'T REQUIRE THIS TO BE MADE OF METAL INSTEAD OF WOOD? THE BUILDING DIVISION DID NOT MAKE ANY COMMENTS TO THAT REGARD.

A PERMIT PROCESS AS WOULD HAVE BEEN THROUGH THE SYSTEM FOR THEIR REVIEW AS WELL, AND THEY DID NOT MAKE ANY COMMENTS IN THAT REGARD.

NOW, THE APPLICANT IS ALSO PRESENT AND HE COULD ADDRESS THAT A LITTLE BIT BETTER THAN I CAN. OK, THANKS.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS? OK, SEEING NONE, WE'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 4:34.

WE HAD NO PUBLIC COMMENT SENT IN SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSING THIS ITEM.

SO WE'LL GO, OH, ACTUALLY, I GUESS WE'LL GO STRAIGHT TO THE APPLICANT.

WHO DO WE HAVE ON THE LINE FOR THE APPLICANT? THIS IS BRAX, CAN YOU GUYS HEAR ME? YES, OK, GREAT, GOOD.

BECAUSE I'M NOT , I DON'T I'M NOT GETTING VIDEO FEED, BUT I'VE GOT A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT AND OBVIOUSLY KNOW WHAT THE ISSUES ARE HERE.

SO IF ANYBODY HAS ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO ASK ABOUT IT.

I CAN I CAN HELP WALK YOU THROUGH IT.

BUT ESSENTIALLY WHAT THIS REQUEST IS FOR IS JUST LIKE ADRIEL SAID, A WOODEN STAIR AND LANDING. IT'S NOT REALLY RELATED TO ADA.

IT'S MORE OF A RESULT OF THE FIRE MARSHAL ACTUALLY HAVING OBJECTIONS TO JUST THE ONE EXIT OUT THE FRONT DOOR ON 23RD STREET.

WE DO HAVE WE DIDN'T REALIZE THAT THIS WAS AN ISSUE INITIALLY BECAUSE WE PROVIDE EGRESS WINDOWS FROM BOTH, FROM TWO OF THE BEDROOMS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING.

THEY ACTUALLY THE ISSUE COMES UP AND NOT TO GET TOO DEEP INTO IT, BUT BECAUSE THOSE WINDOWS AND THEN THE SECOND EXIT LEAD TO A COURTYARD THAT THE INHABITANTS COULDN'T GET OUT OF.

SO ESSENTIALLY, THE THE SECOND EXIT HAS TO ENTER OUT ONTO A RIGHT-OF-WAY.

AND SO THAT WAS THE OBJECTION FROM THE FIRE MARSHAL.

WE PROPOSED THIS SOLUTION.

IT DOES A COUPLE OF THINGS.

THE BUILDING HAS AN ELEVATED CONCRETE SLAB AS IT'S FINISHED FLOOR.

SO WE'RE UP ABOUT FORTY TWO INCHES ABOVE THE GRADE HERE IN ORDER TO EXIT OUT THIS LANDING WILL ACTUALLY BE SITUATED OVER WHAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ONE OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS IN THE EXHIBIT WHERE YOU MIGHT SEE A PIPE THAT SEEMS TO BE COMING OUT OF THE ALLEYWAY AND THEN TURNS 90 DEGREES AND GOES INTO THE BUILDING.

SO THIS STAIR AND LANDING WILL ACTUALLY BE BUILT RIGHT OVER THE TOP OF THAT PIPE, IF YOU CAN SEE IT, AND ACTUALLY PROTECT IT BETTER THAN IT IS NOW.

RIGHT NOW, IT'S EXPOSED.

IT COULD BE HIT BY SOMEBODY DRIVING DOWN THE ALLEY OR A TRASH TRUCK OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. SO THIS PROTECTS IT A LITTLE BIT.

AND II ALSO IF WE WERE TO CUT THE CONCRETE SLAB INSIDE THE BUILDING AND DROP THESE STAIRS DOWN INSIDE THE BUILDING, IT WOULD REQUIRE US TO TO MOVE THAT PIPE BECAUSE THE DOOR IS SITUATED SUCH THAT IT COMES OUT DIRECTLY AT THAT PIPE.

AND SO THIS COMES OUT ABOVE IT AND THEN TURNS AND GOES DOWN TO THE TO THE ALLEY, IF THAT

[00:45:01]

MAKES ANY SENSE. IT ALSO THIS WAY, WE'RE NOT LETTING FLOODWATER GET INTO THE BUILDING IN ANOTHER LOCATION OTHER THAN THE FRONT VESTIBULE WHERE WE ALREADY HAVE THAT CONDITION.

OTHER THAN THAT, WE'RE NOT IMPACTING THE SIDEWALK AT ALL.

THIS LEAVES ENOUGH ROOM FOR THE EMERGENCY VEHICLES.

AND REALLY, THIS IS A PRETTY GOOD SOLUTION, I THINK.

SO I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS THAT YOU GUYS MIGHT HAVE.

THE PROJECT IS A REALLY GOOD PROJECT.

THERE'S FOUR UNITS ALREADY OCCUPIED UPSTAIRS.

THESE WOULD FINISH OUT THE BUILDING AND PROVIDE ADDITIONAL HOUSING AND OR SHORT TERM RENTAL. THE UPSTAIRS CURRENTLY BEING USED FOR A COMBINATION OF THOSE TWO.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS.

FEEL FREE.

THANK YOU, BRAX. COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS? VICE CHAIRPERSON BROWN? BRAX? YOU CAN PROBABLY ANSWER MY QUESTION.

I HAD THE STAFF EARLIER, ABOUT IT, BUT IT SEEMS LIKE WHEN YOU SEE EXTERIOR FIRE EXITS THAT THEY'RE ORDINARILY MADE OUT OF METAL, GALVANIZED METAL OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, I WAS JUST WONDERING, I GUESS THEY ALLOW THEM AND IBC ALLOWS WOOD, IS THAT RIGHT? YEAH, SURE. IT'S NOT.

YOU KNOW, THE BUILDING DOESN'T EXCEED THE ALLOWABLE SIZE OR HEIGHT FOR TO USE WOOD.

YOU KNOW, THE INTERIOR PARTITIONS ARE ALSO WOOD.

THIS COULD BE MADE OUT OF METAL.

IT'S JUST FOR I GUESS FOR EASE OF CONSTRUCTION AND COST I THINK IS ARE THE REASONS FOR IT BEING WOOD.

YEAH, I'M ALSO I'M LOOKING AT THE PHOTOGRAPHS THAT WAS PART OF THE PACKAGE.

AND YOU CAN SEE A COUPLE OF DUMPSTERS THERE.

AND IT LOOKS LIKE THAT'S ABOUT THE LOCATION WHERE MAYBE THE STAIR WOULD GO, RIGHT? EXACTLY. EXACTLY.

I CAN'T SEE THE PHOTO YOU'RE LOOKING AT, BUT I DO HAVE THEM HERE.

AND IF YOU LOOK AT THE ONE THAT IS SORT OF A SHOT DOWN THE ALLEY AND YOU CAN SEE THE LITTLE RED STROBE ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING, THERE IT'S PRETTY SMALL PROBABLY IN THE PHOTO, YOU SEE.

BUT THAT'S BEST.

THAT'S ROUGHLY WHERE THE DOOR WOULD GO IS BELOW THE BELOW THAT.

IT WOULD BE BELOW THE THIRD WINDOW DOWN FROM 23RD STREET WHERE THAT DOOR COMES OUT.

I'M GUESSING IT WOULDN'T STICK OUT MUCH MORE THAN THAT BIG BLUE DUMPSTER IN THAT PHOTO, IS THAT RIGHT.

NO, NO IT WOULDN'T.

IT'S ALL WITHIN THAT SAME ZONE OF STUFF THAT'S ALONG THERE.

IT'D PROBABLY STICK OUT BEYOND THE GREASE BUT NOT THE DUMPSTER ITSELF.

RIGHT.

AND ONE LAST QUESTION.

SURE.

YOU DON'T HAVE ANY PLANS TO REMOVE THE SLIPCOVER ON THAT BUILDING, DO YOU? I'M JUST WONDERING IF THERE'S A HISTORIC FACADE BEHIND IT.

KIND OF LIKE THERE IS ONE [INAUDIBLE] DOWN WHERE THAT EVENTS CENTER WAS.

NO, THE THE SLIP COVER IS ACTUALLY HISTORIC.

AND THE HISTORY ON THE BUILDING IS THAT IT BURNED.

AND SO THERE IS NO MORE FACADE BENEATH IT.

IF YOU WERE TO PEEL THAT OFF, YOU WOULD HAVE, USED TO HAVE RED TERRACOTTA BRICK FACADE THAT'S, THERE WAS NEVER A PLACE, THE ORIGINAL FACADE AFTER THE FIRE.

SO THERE THAT IS THE HISTORIC FACADE, ODDLY ENOUGH.

WHEN WAS THAT PUT ON OR WHEN WAS THE FIRE? 70S? I DON'T REMEMBER THE EXACT DATE, BOB, BUT IT'S IN THE 70S.

OK? RIGHT. YEAH, THAT'S ALL I HAVE.

THANKS.

SURE. THANK YOU.

COMMISSIONERS, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? IF WE CAN JUST IDENTIFY THAT WAS BRAX EASTERWOOD THAT WAS SPEAKING? YEAH.

THANK YOU. YES.

ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? SEEING NONE, WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 4:42 AND I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON CASE 21P-013.

COMMISSIONER ANTONELLI? I SEE YOUR HAND UP.

EXCUSE ME. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE 21P-013 WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS.

DO I HAVE A SECOND? I SEE A, SEE AND HEAR A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER PENA.

SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION, COMMISSIONERS? I SEE NO HANDS UP, SO NO DISCUSSION, SO WE'RE READY TO CALL A VOTE ON CASE 21P-013,

[00:50:07]

PLEASE. MS. GORMAN, COMMISSIONER ANTONELLI? I'M IN FAVOR. VICE CHAIRPERSON BROWN? IN FAVOR. CHAIRPERSON HILL? IN FAVOR. COMMISSIONER HOLLAWAY? IN FAVOR. COMMISSIONER PENA? IN FAVOR.

COMMISSIONER WALLA? FAVOR. ALL IN FAVOR, THE MOTION PASSES.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH, COMMISSIONERS.

THAT WAS A UNANIMOUS VOTE ON THAT.

NEXT CASE WE'LL, HERE IS 21P-014.

[7.C.1. 21P-014 (2405 – 2441 103rd Street) Request For A Replat In Order To Increase The Number Of Lots From Ten To Eighteen. The Properties Are Legally Described Lots 2 – 11, Neumann Addition (2020), In The City And County Of Galveston, Texas. Applicant: James Yarbrough Property Owner: Neumann Investments, LLC]

OK, 21P-014, THIS IS A REQUEST FOR A REPLAT FROM 10 TO 18 LOTS.

THERE WERE NO OBJECTIONS FROM CITY DEPARTMENTS.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REPLAT IN ORDER TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF LOTS FROM 10 TO 18 IN A RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY R1 ZONING DISTRICT.

THE SITE IS CURRENTLY COMPRISED OF 10 UNDEVELOPED LOTS, IT'S CURRENTLY CONFIGURED EACH LOT, IT'S 90 FEET WIDE BY A 100 FEET IN LENGTH.

THE SURROUNDING LOTS ARE ALSO IN THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY R1 DISTRICT.

THERE WERE NO OBJECTIONS FROM PUBLIC OR PRIVATE UTILITIES.

PLEASE NOTE THE REPLAT FULL CRITERIA ON PAGE TWO OF YOUR STAFF REPORT.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL OF THE REPLAT REQUEST WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.

THOSE CONDITIONS ARE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS.

ONLY ONE, PAGE TWO OF THE REPORT AND THE STANDARD CONDITIONS, TWO TO FOUR ON YOUR STAFF REPORT. AND NOW WE HAVE SOME PHOTOS.

THIS IS AN AERIAL IMAGE OF THE SUBJECT SITE.

NEXT SLIDE, CATHERINE, PLEASE. THESE ARE THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND WEST, AND THAT CONCLUDES STAFF'S REPORT.