[00:00:01]
ALL RIGHT, I'LL CALL THIS MEETING TO ORDER.
[Landmark Commission on April 5, 2021.]
WELCOME TO THE LANDMARK COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OF MONDAY, APRIL 5TH 2021.PRESENT. COMMISSIONER HUDDLESTON.
PRESENT. COMMISSIONER MCLEAN HAS NOT JOINED US.
COMMISSIONER PATTERSON. PRESENT.
COMMISSIONER STETZEL-THOMPSON.
COMMISSIONER SWANSON. COMMISSIONER SWANSON, I THINK YOUR MUTED.
PRESENT. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT, Y'ALL KEEP ME ON MY TOES.
OK, AND THEN STAFF PRESENT IS MYSELF, CATHERINE GORMAN, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, AND DONNA FAIRWEATHER, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY.
OK, ANY CONFLICT OF INTEREST TODAY.
HAS EVERYBODY HAD A CHANCE TO LOOK AT THE MINUTES FROM THE LAST MEETING.
ANY QUESTIONS, CHANGES, CONCERNS, NO? SEEING NONE THEY WILL STAND APPROVED AS PRESENTED.
HAVE ANY, I [INAUDIBLE] MEETING FORMAT.
JUST OUR STANDARD REMINDERS ABOUT THE MEETING FORMAT, THE GALLERY VIEW IS THE BEST WAY TO VIEW THE MEETING, AND IT'S HOW IT'S SHOWN TO THE PUBLIC.
BEST TO KEEP YOUR MICROPHONE MUTED UNLESS YOU'RE SPEAKING TO CUT DOWN ON BACKGROUND NOISE. WE ASK THAT YOU PHYSICALLY RAISE YOUR HAND TO GET THE CHAIR'S ATTENTION WHEN YOU'RE SPEAKING OR MAKING A MOTION.
STAFF IS HERE TO PARTICIPATE BY PHONE, AS ARE THE APPLICANTS.
AND WE'LL BE TAKING THE VOTES BY ROLL CALL.
NO PUBLIC COMMENT WAS RECEIVED.
OK, WE'LL MOVE ON TO THEN TO THE NEW BUSINESS AND ASSOCIATED PUBLIC HEARINGS.
THIS IS 1416 BALL AND IT'S A REQUEST FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR ALTERATIONS TO THE STRUCTURE, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS.
STAFF IS REQUESTING THE ABOVE REFERENCE REQUEST BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE JUNE 7TH MEETING IN ORDER FOR THE APPLICANT TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
THIS IS THE FIRST REQUEST FOR DEFERRAL AND THERE ARE NO COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE REQUEST. THE REPORT THAT WAS IN YOUR PACKET ORIGINALLY HAD MAY 3RD AS THE REFERRAL DATE DEFERRAL DATE. THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED JUNE 7TH.
THAT CONCLUDES STAFF'S REPORT.
I HAVE A MOTION TO DEFER CASE 21LC-008 UNTIL JUNE SEVEN.
DO WE HAVE A SECOND. OK, SARAH, VERY GOOD.
DISCUSSION. NO. ALL RIGHT LET'S VOTE ON THIS.
CALL] ALL IN FAVOR. THE MOTION PASSES, NEXT CASE, 21LC-010 THIS IS 1818 AVENUE L IS A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE STAFF IS REQUESTING THAT THE ABOVE REFERENCE REQUEST BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE APRIL 19TH MEETING IN ORDER FOR THE APPLICANT TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
THIS IS THE FIRST REQUEST FOR DEFERRAL AND THERE ARE NO COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE REQUEST. AGAIN, THIS IS A CHANGE FROM WHAT WAS IN YOUR PACKET.
IN YOUR PACKET, THERE WAS A STAFF REPORT.
THE APPLICANTS HAVE SINCE ASKED FOR THIS DEFERRAL IN ORDER TO PROVIDE SOME UPDATED DRAWINGS.
ALL RIGHT, I'M ASKING FOR A MOTION TO DEFER THE CASE TO APRIL 19.
[00:05:08]
AND I WILL GO AHEAD AND MAKE.IS THERE A SECOND. I'LL SECOND.
ALL RIGHT. AND ANY DISCUSSION? SEEING NONE, I'LL CALL FOR A VOTE.
CALL] ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION PASSES.
ALL RIGHT, THEN, NEXT CASE [INAUDIBLE]] 21LC-011.
IT'S A REQUEST FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR ALTERATIONS TO THE STRUCTURE, INCLUDING REPLACEMENT OF SHINGLE ROOF WITH A STANDING METAL ROOF.
PUBLIC NOTICES SENT WERE FOUR.
ONE RETURNED THAT ONE IN FAVOR.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS TO INSTALL A STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF. THE CURRENT ROOF SURFACES, COMPOSITION, SHINGLES, EXHIBIT B IN YOUR STAFF REPORT PROVIDED MORE DETAILS ON THE PROPOSED ROOFING MATERIALS.
CONFORMANCE WITH THE STANDARDS STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED ROOF CONFORMS TO THE DESIGN STANDARDS BASED ON THE PHOTOS SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT AND EXHIBIT B.
DESIGN STANDARDS ALLOW FOR METAL ROOFS WHEN APPLIED AND DETAILED IN A MANNER THAT IS COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING STRUCTURES.
STAFF FINDS THAT A STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF WOULD BE AN APPROPRIATE ROOFING MATERIAL AS IT WILL NOT DISTRACT FROM THE ARCHITECTURAL HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY . STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF CASE 21LC-011 TO INSTALL A STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. SPECIFIC CONDITION ONE.
THE APPLICANT SHALL CONFORM TO THE DESIGN MATERIALS AND PLACEMENT SHOWN IN ATTACHMENT A OF THE STAFF REPORT. AND THEN ITEMS 2 THROUGH 6 ARE STANDARD.
GIVE ME ONE SECOND, I'LL GET THOSE PICTURES UP.
AND PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH, AND THAT CONCLUDES STAFF'S REPORT.
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF FROM THE COMMISSION? SEEING NONE. I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 21LC-011 AND ASK IF THE APPLICANT IS HERE WITH US.
I CAN HEAR YOU NOW. IF YOU'LL JUST STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE.
I'M SORRY? MS. HALL IS THERE ANYTHING THAT YOU'D LIKE TO PRESENT TO THE COMMISSIONERS, THIS IS YOUR TIME TO SPEAK NO, IF YOU GUYS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AND I WOULD ANSWER THEM.
ALL RIGHT. DOES ANYONE IN THE COMMISSION HAVE A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT? WE'RE DEALING WITH THESE METAL ROOFS MORE AND MORE IT SEEMS. I'M NOT SEEING ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION, SO IN THAT CASE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 21LC-011 AND BRING IT BACK TO THE COMMISSION.
[00:10:02]
I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE WE APPROVE CASE 21LC-011 WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS.
SHARON,[INAUDIBLE] I SEE YOUR LIPS MOVE. I SECOND.
OK, YEAH, THANK YOU VERY MUCH, [INAUDIBLE] ALL RIGHT.
NO. ALL RIGHT, THEN I'LL GO AHEAD AND CALL FOR A VOTE.
YOU'RE STILL MUTED, YOU'RE STILL IF YOU COULD INDICATE BY JUST A THUMBS UP, IF YOU'RE VOTING IN FAVOR, OK, COMMISSIONER SWANSON VOTES IN FAVOR.
ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION PASSES.
DISCUSSION ITEMS. JUST A REMINDER OF [INAUDIBLE] FEEDBACK AGAIN.
OK, SO IT'S JUST A REMINDER OF THE WORKSHOP WE'RE GOING TO HAVE ON MONDAY, APRIL 12, OUR TOPICS ARE A COMPLIANCE UPDATE, CONTINUED DISCUSSION OF NEW CONSTRUCTION IN HISTORIC DISTRICTS, A NEW ITEM, WHICH IS THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS FOR PORCH FLOORS.
AND JOHN MCNATT, WHO IS A LOCAL CONTRACTOR AND A FORMER LANDMARK COMMISSIONER, HAS VOLUNTEERED TO DO A PRESENTATION ABOUT THE DIFFERENT KINDS OF WOODS AVAILABLE FOR PORCH FLOORS AND THEIR PROS AND CONS.
SO THAT SHOULD BE INTERESTING.
WHAT TIME IS THE. THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION.
I HAD FOUR O'CLOCK IN MY NOTES, DOES THAT WORK FOR EVERYBODY? OK.
I JUST THOUGHT OF THREE O'CLOCK MIGHT BE BETTER GIVE US A LITTLE MORE TIME TO HAVE THE PRESENTATION AND DISCUSS.
I THINK IT WOULD GIVE US SOME MORE TIME.
SO NEXT MONDAY, THREE O'CLOCK, THREE O'CLOCK, THREE O'CLOCK NEXT MONDAY, AND SO YOU'LL BE GETTING AN AGENDA LATER IN THE WEEK ON THAT.
DAVID, I THINK WE'RE TRYING TO PROVE WE NEED TO MEET IN PERSON.
[INAUDIBLE] I WONDER IF WE COULD AS A NOTE [INAUDIBLE] INCLUDE THE UNIVERSAL THUMBS UP TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF WHEN WE'RE HAVING DIFFICULTIES GETTING OUR MIC ON, SURE WE CAN ADD THAT.
THUMBS UP. I'M IN SO THAT WE CAN [INAUDIBLE] BECAUSE SOMETIMES IT IS A COMPUTER GLITCH, ABSOLUTELY, I'LL ADD THAT TO THE NOTE.
[INAUDIBLE] HAS JOINED US JUST IN TIME FOR ADJOURNMENT.
17 MINUTE MEETING, BUT YOU NEED TO CALL FOR THE ADJOURNMENT.
I MAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN PLEASE.
[00:15:06]
OK, BYE, EVERYBODY. WE'LL SEE YOU ON MONDAY.BYE.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.